Back to rankings

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG)

Overvalued
Financial ServicesInsurance BrokersUnited States

Fundamental

54

Price

$232.39

Market Cap

$58.82B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. is an insurance and reinsurance broker and a third-party claims administrator, founded nearly a hundred years ago and headquartered in Illinois. It does not underwrite insurance and does not carry the risk of a loss on its own books: it stands between the client who needs cover and the underwriting enterprise that provides it, arranging the placement, advising on how to manage risk, and running employee benefit programmes. A second, smaller business, Gallagher Bassett, handles the claims of companies and public bodies that self-insure rather than buy a policy. The 2025 10-K describes a network of more than 650 sales and service offices in the United States and about 400 offices in roughly 60 countries, some 72,000 employees, and approximately 780 acquisitions completed between January 2002 and December 2025 — including AssuredPartners, which the company calls the largest acquisition in its history. About 67% of brokerage and risk management revenue is generated in the United States and 33% internationally, mainly in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United Kingdom.

How it makes money

Gallagher is paid in four ways, all of them disclosed separately in the income statement. Commissions ($8,024 million in 2025) are a percentage of the premium the client pays, and the company states plainly that it does not set those premiums. Fees ($4,195 million) are agreed with the client for a defined level of service, usually in place of a commission, and are the way the claims administration business is paid. Supplemental revenues ($466 million) are paid up front by underwriting enterprises on an annual or quarterly basis, while contingent revenues ($324 million) arrive only after the contract period, generally in the first or second quarter of the following year, and depend on the growth or the loss experience of the business placed. The remainder ($769 million) is interest income, premium finance and other income. Roughly 85% of commission and fee revenue is recognised on the effective date of the underlying insurance contract, which makes the revenue lumpy by quarter while costs stay broadly even through the year.

Revenue by segment

Brokerage87%

Retail and wholesale property/casualty broking, reinsurance broking, employee benefits consulting and captive operations, sold to commercial, industrial, nonprofit and public sector clients and to insurance capital providers. It earns commissions from underwriting enterprises plus fees from clients, and reported $12,192 million of revenue before reimbursements in 2025.

Risk Management13%

Contract claim settlement and administration, loss control and risk management consulting, marketed largely independently of the brokerage arm to Fortune 1000 companies, large public entities and other organisations that self-insure. In 2025 about 59% of its revenue came from workers' compensation claims, 34% from general and commercial auto liability and 7% from property claims.

Corporate0%

Not an operating business: it holds the group's debt, external acquisition costs, foreign currency remeasurement and the clean energy investments, and its revenue is the run-off of legacy investments. It produced $1 million of revenue in 2025 and a pre-tax loss of $1,137 million, mostly interest expense and corporate costs.

Competitive moat

Scale · Narrow

The filing describes Gallagher as the third largest insurance broker in the world by revenue and one of the largest property/casualty third-party claims administrators, with about 1,050 offices, 72,000 employees and roughly 780 acquisitions since 2002 — a distribution footprint that is expensive to replicate and that gives it access to markets and carrier relationships a small broker cannot match. Because it places risk rather than carrying it, it needs little capital to grow. The advantage is real but not impregnable: the company itself discloses significant competitive pressure in every one of its businesses, competition from Insurtech entrants and from clients moving to self-insurance and captives, and the concrete experience of losing key brokers and whole teams to rivals along with their clients.

What drives demand

Moderately cyclical

Insurance is largely non-discretionary for a business, so most of Gallagher's book renews each year regardless of the economy, and the risk management segment is countercyclical at the margin because claims still have to be handled. What does move with the cycle is the size of the commission: revenue is a percentage of premium, and premiums swing between hard markets (rates rising, commissions rising with them) and soft markets (rates flat or falling, pressure on revenue), a cycle the filing describes as outside the company's control or prediction. Underlying exposure moves too — the clients' payrolls, revenues and asset values shrink in a downturn, and the 10-K notes that clients may reduce the amount they spend. When rates harden, buyers push back by raising deductibles and retaining more risk, which mutes the upside. Two further swing factors: contingent and supplemental revenues depend on carriers' loss experience, and interest income on cash and fiduciary balances rose sharply with rates, from $368 million in 2023 to $769 million in 2025.

Key risks

  • Commissions follow premiums the company does not control — Item 1A states that much of the revenue comes from commissions based on a percentage of premiums that Gallagher does not set, that premiums are cyclical and can vary widely, and that brokerage revenue and profitability can therefore be volatile or stay depressed for long periods. A soft market pushes commission revenue down; insurers may also cut the commission rates they pay brokers. The company adds that it cannot forecast its commission revenue precisely.
  • Acquisition strategy and integration — The company discloses that it may not be able to continue acquiring at the historical pace and lists the risks attached: retention of the acquired personnel and clients, liabilities not covered by escrow or indemnities, licensing and regulatory compliance, tax and accounting issues, and integration difficulties in IT and human resources. It notes explicitly that integrating large deals — AssuredPartners is named as the largest in its history — is more complex, may divert management attention, and that failure of targets to reach expected revenue and earnings could produce goodwill impairment charges.
  • Contingent and supplemental revenues are hard to predict — A meaningful portion of revenue consists of contingent and supplemental payments from underwriting enterprises. Contingent revenues are paid only after the contract period, based on the growth and profitability of the business placed, so the company must estimate them each quarter using historical averages. It warns that where revenue depends on a full calendar year loss ratio, bad loss experience in the fourth quarter can not only wipe out that quarter's earnings but force a reversal of revenue already recognised earlier in the year.
  • Cybersecurity and confidential client data — The company flags that improper disclosure of confidential, personal or proprietary information, and cyberattacks or other breaches of its systems or those of the third-party vendors it relies on, could bring regulatory scrutiny, legal liability and reputational harm. A separate risk factor covers changes in data privacy and protection law and any failure to comply with them.
  • Talent, and the brokers who take clients with them — Success is said to depend in part on attracting and retaining qualified talent, including senior management. Competition for people is described as intense, particularly in claims management, IT, AI and data engineering, and remote working has widened the pool of employers competing for the same staff. The company states that it has in the past lost key brokers and groups of brokers to competitors along with their clients and business relationships, and warns separately that sustained increases in compensation and benefit costs could reduce profitability — compensation was $7,842 million of $12,071 million of total 2025 expenses.
  • Debt, ratings and the holding company structure — The company discloses that its outstanding debt could reduce financial flexibility and subjects it to restrictions on how it operates, that a credit rating downgrade would raise financing costs and create operational risk, and that as a holding company it may not receive dividends or distributions from its subsidiaries in the amounts it needs. Interest expense was $639 million in 2025, carried entirely in the corporate segment.
  • International operations and worldwide regulation — Substantial operations outside the United States expose the company to risks different from those it faces domestically, including currency movements and changes in tax law. Separate risk factors cover possible violations of the FCPA, the U.K. Bribery Act, other anti-corruption and sanctions laws and FATCA, and the possibility that failure to meet regulatory requirements — or a change in those requirements — could stop it conducting business or make it less profitable.

Customer concentration

Top customers account for 3% of revenue

Concentration is close to nil. The 10-K states that in 2025 the largest single client represented approximately 1% and the ten largest clients together approximately 3% of combined brokerage and risk management revenues. The client base spans commercial, industrial, public sector, religious and nonprofit entities as well as underwriting enterprises served by the reinsurance and claims businesses. No single client leaving would matter to the group; what matters instead is whether whole teams of brokers stay, since the filing says departing brokers have taken their clients with them.

The case for

Buyers argue that this is a toll booth on insurance rather than an insurer: Gallagher explicitly does not assume net underwriting risk, so a bad catastrophe year hits its clients' carriers, not its own balance sheet, and the business needs little capital to grow. They point to a client base so fragmented that the ten largest names are about 3% of revenue, to revenue that is contractual and renews annually, and to a brokerage segment that produced $2,759 million of pre-tax earnings on $12,192 million of revenue in 2025. They argue the acquisition machine is a genuine competitive asset — roughly 780 deals since 2002 in a still highly fragmented brokerage market, with AssuredPartners and Woodruff Sawyer lifting 2025 revenue before reimbursements 21% to $13,778 million — and that higher interest rates turned fiduciary cash into a real earnings stream, with interest and other income more than doubling from $368 million in 2023 to $769 million in 2025.

The case against

Sellers fear that the growth is bought rather than earned, and that the 2025 accounts show what it costs. Revenue before reimbursements rose 21%, but net earnings went from $1,471 million to $1,503 million and earnings before income taxes actually fell, from $1,875 million to $1,871 million, as amortisation climbed to $916 million and interest expense to $639 million. The balance sheet now carries $22,593 million of goodwill and $10,684 million of net amortisable intangibles against $70,665 million of total assets, and the company itself warns that targets missing their revenue and earnings expectations could force goodwill impairments. They note that AssuredPartners is described in the filing as the largest acquisition in the company's history and its integration as more complex, with the potential to divert management. Beyond the deals, they worry that commissions ride a premium cycle management admits it cannot predict or control, that contingent revenue already recognised can be reversed if a carrier's fourth-quarter loss experience turns bad, that buyers respond to hard markets by retaining more risk and moving to captives, and that brokers who leave take clients with them.

Generated on September 17, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on September 17, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

P/E: 20.9Score: 67Market cap: $80.66B

The world's largest insurance broker, competing head-on with Gallagher for commercial property/casualty placement, employee-benefits consulting and reinsurance broking for large corporate clients worldwide.

P/E: 19.5Score: 65Market cap: $20.16B

US retail broker built, like Gallagher, on serial acquisitions of local agencies, competing for the same small and mid-sized American commercial clients.

Aon plcAON

Global broker offering the same mix of risk placement, reinsurance broking and human-capital consulting, and bidding for the same multinational and middle-market accounts as Gallagher.

WTW plc (Willis Towers Watson)WTW

Competes for the same corporate risk-advisory and employee-benefits mandates, and its Willis Re heritage puts it against Gallagher Re in reinsurance broking.

Hub International LimitedNot tracked

Privately held North American retail broker that competes directly with Gallagher for middle-market commercial and benefits accounts in the US and Canada, and for the same agency acquisitions.

Alliant Insurance Services, Inc.Not tracked

Private US broker that grows largely by recruiting entire producer teams, competing with Gallagher for specialty commercial niches such as public entities, healthcare and construction.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$15.75B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Net Income

$1.57B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Free Cash Flow

-

Total Equity

$23.32B

Total Liabilities

$47.32B

Current Ratio

1.05

Interest Coverage

-

Debt/EBITDA

3.26

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

InsuranceOvervalued

Fair Value

$137.59

Current Price

$232.39

Margin of Safety

-68.9%

Fair Value Range

$89.43 - $185.75

Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.

Estimation Methods

Analyst price target:$289.67
Discounted cash flow (DCF):Not applicable to this type of company
Earnings multiple (P/E):$95.94
Graham growth formula:Not applicable to this type of company
Earnings power value (EPV):Not applicable to this type of company
Justified P/B:$62.90
Dividend discount (Gordon):$63.41
P/FFO, funds from operations:Not applicable to this type of company
Mid-cycle earnings:Not applicable to this type of company
Revenue multiple:Not applicable to this type of company
Analyst Consensus:Buy (22B / 7H / 0S)
Last Earnings Surprise:-0.01%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

37.83

ROE

6.4%

P/B Ratio

2.47

P/FCF

-

Gross Margin

-

ROIC

-

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

-

WACC

7.1%

ROIC − WACC

-

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (12)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 12.13%
  • Price CAGR 16.55%
  • P/B Ratio 2.47
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Current Ratio
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 14.8%
  • Analyst Consensus 76% Buy
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.56
  • Piotroski F-Score 5/9

Failed (8)

  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • ROE 6.7%
  • Earnings Surprise avg -2.4%
  • PEG Ratio 5.76
  • Share Dilution 15.6%
  • Net Margin Trend 10.0% vs 13.2%

Unavailable (8)

  • ROIC NaN%
  • Gross Margin NaN%
  • P/FCF NaN
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Operating Margin NaN%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • Interest Coverage

Piotroski F-Score

5/9

Mixed signals: some areas need attention

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

1.56

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

15.6%

Issuing new shares, diluting ownership

Institutional Holdings

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. J. Patrick Gallagher Jr.Chairman & CEO73
Mr. Thomas Joseph GallagherPresident66
Mr. Douglas K. Howell CPACorporate VP & CFO63
Mr. Patrick M. GallagherExecutive VP & COO45
Mr. Walter D. BayVP, General Counsel & Secretary62
Mr. David R. LongVice President73
Mr. Richard C. CaryChief Accounting Officer & Controller62
Mr. Mark H. BloomCorporate VP & Global Chief Information Officer61
Ms. Sara WalshTreasurer, VP of Corporate Finance & Investor Relations-
Ms. Linda J. CollinsVice President of Corporate Communications-

Audit Risk

5

Board Risk

6

Compensation Risk

7

Shareholder Rights Risk

5

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Documents

  • Annual Report (10-K)

    A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.

    Filed on 2026-02-17

    View document
  • Quarterly Report (10-Q)

    A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.

    Filed on 2026-08-05

    View document
  • Current Report (8-K)

    An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.

    Filed on 2026-08-27

    View document

via SEC EDGAR

Income History

via SEC EDGAR

Latest News

Recent headlines for AJG, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 5/25/2026POSITIVE
    Here's How Much You Would Have Made Owning Arthur J. Gallagher Stock In The Last 15 Years

    Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. stock has delivered a remarkable 15-year performance, showcasing significant investor returns. While specific figures for the entire period are not detailed in this snippet, the title implies substantial growth, likely driven by consistent business expansion, strategic acquisitions, and a strong market position in the insurance brokerage and risk management sector. Investors who held AJG stock over this extended timeframe would have benefited from its upward trajectory, underscoring the company's resilience and ability to generate long-term value.

  • 3/11/2026NEUTRAL
    Minnesota Rep. Kelly Morrison Sold Up to $110K Worth of Arthur J. Gallagher Stock

    Minnesota Representative Kelly Morrison reported selling between $50,001 and $110,000 worth of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. stock on March 7th. The transaction involved shares held indirectly through a trust. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. is a global insurance brokerage and risk management services firm. While insider selling can sometimes signal a lack of confidence, the amount is relatively small compared to the company's market capitalization, and the sale was made by a representative's spouse, not directly by the representative. This trade is unlikely to have a significant impact on the company's stock performance.

via Markets Gazette