Back to rankings

Evolution Mining Limited (CAHPF)

Overvalued
Basic MaterialsGoldAustralia

Fundamental

68

Price

$13.03

Market Cap

$27.97B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Evolution Mining is an Australian miner that digs up and processes rock to extract gold, with copper as a significant byproduct at some of its mines. It operates a portfolio of underground and open-pit mines, including Cowal, Ernest Henry, Red Lake, Mungari and Northparkes, spanning Australia and Canada. It does not sell to a single end customer; it produces gold bullion and copper concentrate that are sold into global commodity markets at prevailing prices.

How it makes money

Revenue is simply ounces of gold and tonnes of copper produced, multiplied by the market price on the day they are sold; Evolution has little influence over that price. Gold is the primary product across the portfolio, with copper — produced mainly at Ernest Henry and Cowal — a smaller but meaningful secondary contributor. Because mining and processing costs are largely fixed once a mine is running, profit is highly sensitive to swings in the gold and copper price.

Competitive moat

No identified moat · None

Gold and copper are undifferentiated commodities sold at a price set by global markets, not by Evolution. A mining company can have better or worse ore bodies and lower or higher costs than its peers, but it cannot charge more for its gold than anyone else does, so there is no durable competitive advantage in the way a brand or a patent provides one.

What drives demand

Cyclical

Evolution's results move with global gold and copper prices, which themselves swing with macroeconomic cycles: gold tends to rise when investors seek a safe haven during uncertainty or falling real interest rates, while copper tracks industrial and construction activity worldwide. A period of high metal prices can lift profit sharply, and a downturn in prices compresses it just as fast, independent of how well the mines themselves are run.

The case for

Buyers argue that record gold and copper output, combined with strong metal prices, has already delivered record profit and a higher dividend, and that a long-life, multi-mine portfolio spread across two countries reduces the risk of any single operation disappointing.

The case against

Sellers worry that today's record results depend on metal prices Evolution does not control and that could fall back, that mining carries operational risks such as lower ore grades or unexpected costs at any given site, and that a portfolio built around a handful of mines leaves less room to absorb a problem at one of them.

Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on September 18, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

P/E: 14.6Score: 86Market cap: $122.28B

The world's largest gold miner, producing gold and copper from the Boddington and Tanami mines in Australia, the same metals and the same domestic operating ground as Evolution.

Northern Star Resources LimitedNST

The other large ASX-listed gold producer, mining the same Western Australian and multi-mine gold portfolio and competing with Evolution for the same ounces, assets, skilled workers and gold-equity investors.

Ramelius Resources LimitedRMS

A mid-tier Western Australian gold producer running the same hub-and-spoke model around Mt Magnet and Edna May, bidding against Evolution for Australian gold deposits and acquisitions.

Regis Resources LimitedRRL

An Australian pure-play gold producer with the Duketon operations and a stake in Tropicana, selling the same metal out of the same Australian cost base.

Genesis Minerals LimitedGMD

A fast-growing gold producer consolidating the Leonora district of Western Australia, competing directly with Evolution for regional gold assets and for the same investors in ASX gold stocks.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$5.59B

Trailing 12 months to the last reported quarter — estimated from per-share metrics

Net Income

$1.49B

Trailing 12 months to the last reported quarter — estimated from per-share metrics

Free Cash Flow

$1.16B

Total Equity

$5.87B

Total Liabilities

$1.44B

Current Ratio

1.82

Interest Coverage

-

Debt/EBITDA

0.46

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

CyclicalOvervalued

Fair Value

$10.22

Current Price

$13.03

Margin of Safety

-27.5%

Fair Value Range

$6.65 - $13.80

Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.

Estimation Methods

Analyst price target:$13.48
Discounted cash flow (DCF):Not applicable to this type of company
Earnings multiple (P/E):$10.89
Graham growth formula:Not applicable to this type of company
Earnings power value (EPV):$5.00
Justified P/B:Not applicable to this type of company
Dividend discount (Gordon):Not applicable to this type of company
P/FFO, funds from operations:Not applicable to this type of company
Mid-cycle earnings:Not enough data to compute it
Revenue multiple:Not applicable to this type of company
Analyst Consensus:Hold (10B / 9H / 2S)
Last Earnings Surprise:-2.89%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

17.90

ROE

27.4%

P/B Ratio

4.54

P/FCF

24.01

Gross Margin

45.4%

ROIC

25.5%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

25.5%

WACC

16.2%

ROIC − WACC

+9.3 pp

ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (15)

  • Price CAGR 20.46%
  • ROIC 25.5%
  • Gross Margin 45.4%
  • P/FCF 24.01
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 39.4%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • ROE 25.7%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 24.4%
  • Earnings Surprise avg 13.0%
  • PEG Ratio 0.66
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.79
  • Net Margin Trend 26.5% vs 21.3%

Failed (6)

  • P/B Ratio 4.54
  • CapEx intensity
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • Analyst Consensus 48% Buy
  • Piotroski F-Score 2/9

Unavailable (6)

  • EPS data insufficient
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Interest Coverage
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Share Dilution (missing shares data)

Piotroski F-Score

2/9

Serious financial concerns

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

1.79

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

-

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Institutional Holdings

No institutional filings reported for this company.

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Lawrence John Conway BBus, C.P.A., MAICDCEO, MD & Director-
Ms. Frances SummerhayesChief Financial Officer-
Mr. Matthew O'NeillChief Operating Officer-
Ms. Nancy GuayChief Technical Officer-
Peter O'ConnorGeneral Manager of Investor Relations-
Mr. Evan Elstein A.C.A., B.Com., FCIS, GradDipACGCompany Secretary and VP of IT, Communications & Corporate Affairs-
Mr. Kirron SchmidtVice President of Corporate Development-
Mr. Paul Eagle CAHRI, MNLPVice President of People & Culture-
Ms. Fiona MurfittVice President of Sustainability-

Audit Risk

2

Board Risk

6

Compensation Risk

9

Shareholder Rights Risk

7

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for CAHPF, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for CAHPF.