Back to rankings

Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE)

Undervalued
Consumer DefensiveBeverages - Non-AlcoholicUnited States

Fundamental

71

Price

$190.26

Market Cap

$12.60B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Coca-Cola Consolidated is the largest Coca-Cola bottler in the United States. It is not the company that owns the Coca-Cola brands: it buys concentrates and syrups, manufactures, packages, sells and delivers the finished drinks inside exclusive territories. The 10-K for fiscal 2025 describes a footprint covering 14 states and the District of Columbia, around 60 million consumers, 10 manufacturing plants and about 60 distribution centres, organised in four regions (Carolinas, Mid-Atlantic, Mid-South, Mid-West). Roughly 85% of bottle/can sales volume to retail customers is made up of The Coca-Cola Company's products; the rest is mostly third-party brands it also distributes, such as Monster Energy and Dr Pepper products. Net sales were $7,228.1 million in fiscal 2025, up 4.8% on the prior year.

How it makes money

Revenue comes almost entirely from selling physical cases of beverages to retailers — supermarkets, club and value stores, convenience stores — plus vending and foodservice fountain (post-mix) sales. The company earns the spread between the price it charges retailers and its cost of concentrate, packaging, sweetener and delivery, so results move with two levers: price per case and case volume. In fiscal 2025 net sales grew 4.8% while standard physical case volume rose 0.3%, with management attributing the growth mainly to pricing actions taken in the first quarter. Smaller revenue lines include sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers, post-mix sales, transportation revenue from the Red Classic trucking subsidiaries and equipment maintenance revenue.

Revenue by segment

Sparkling bottle/can beverages58.8%

Carbonated soft drinks — Coca-Cola, Sprite, Fanta and similar brands — sold in bottles and cans to retail chains, convenience stores and foodservice customers. Fiscal 2025 net sales were $4,249.8 million, up 3.5%, driven mainly by multi-pack take-home packages in large store, club and value channels.

Still bottle/can beverages32.7%

Non-carbonated drinks in bottles and cans: water, sports drinks, teas, juices and energy brands including Monster Energy. Fiscal 2025 net sales were $2,362.9 million, up 6.1%, with the company citing performance in large retail and convenience stores.

Other sales8.5%

Everything that is not a bottle or can sold to retail: sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers, fountain/post-mix syrup, freight revenue from the Red Classic trucking subsidiaries and equipment maintenance. Fiscal 2025 net sales of $615.4 million, the difference between total net sales of $7,228.1 million and bottle/can sales of $6,612.7 million.

Competitive moat

Patents and licences · Narrow

The durable advantage is contractual and geographic: beverage agreements with The Coca-Cola Company give exclusive rights to make and distribute those brands inside defined territories, and no competing Coca-Cola bottler can sell into them. On top of that sits a delivery network — 10 plants, roughly 60 distribution centres and its own trucking arm — that a newcomer could not rebuild for a low-priced, heavy, frequently delivered product. The limit is that the advantage is borrowed rather than owned: the brands belong to The Coca-Cola Company, which sets concentrate prices, and the agreements carry requirements whose breach can cost the distribution rights. That is why the moat is real but narrow.

What drives demand

Defensive

Volumes are tied to everyday grocery and convenience purchases rather than to big-ticket spending, so they move within a narrow band across the cycle: in fiscal 2025 standard physical case volume rose 0.3% while net sales rose 4.8%, the difference coming from price. Growth therefore depends far more on whether price increases stick than on the economy accelerating. Weather and the summer season shift sales between quarters, and the exposure that does behave cyclically is the away-from-home side — foodservice, convenience and fountain — which softens when people eat out less, while take-home packages at large retailers hold up.

Key risks

  • Cost, shortage or disruption of raw materials, fuel and supplies — The company states that its business and results of operations may be adversely affected by increased costs or by disruption, unavailability or shortages of raw materials, fuel and other supplies. Aluminium, resin, sweetener and diesel all enter the cost of a case that is sold at a price set well in advance with large retailers.
  • Reliance on purchased finished products — A disclosed risk factor says reliance on purchased finished products from external sources could adversely affect profitability: part of what the company sells it does not make itself, and it depends on other parties' capacity, quality and pricing.
  • Shifts in consumer perception and preferences — The filing flags that changes in public and consumer perception and preferences — including concerns about product safety, sustainability, artificial ingredients, brand reputation and obesity — could reduce demand for its products and reduce profitability.
  • Regulation of nonalcoholic beverages — A further risk factor covers changes in government regulation of nonalcoholic beverages, including rules on obesity and public health, artificial ingredients, recycling and sustainability, product safety and benefit programmes such as SNAP, any of which could reduce demand and profitability.
  • Loss of a single large customer — The company discloses that the loss of Walmart Inc. or of The Kroger Co. as a customer could have a material adverse effect on its operating and financial results. Walmart alone is about 21% of bottle/can sales volume and 17% of net sales, Kroger about 15% of volume and 12% of net sales.
  • Dependence on The Coca-Cola Company and its beverage agreements — Approximately 85% of bottle/can sales volume to retail customers consists of products of The Coca-Cola Company, which is the sole supplier of those products or of the concentrates and syrups needed to make them. The beverage agreements impose requirements on the company, and failure to meet them could result in the loss of distribution rights for the products concerned.

Customer concentration

Top customers account for 29% of revenue

Two retailers dominate the customer list. Walmart Inc. accounts for approximately 21% of total bottle/can sales volume and 17% of total net sales; The Kroger Co. accounts for approximately 15% of volume and 12% of net sales. Together they are 36% of bottle/can volume and 29% of net sales, and the company states that losing either could materially hurt its results. Concentration of this size also means annual price negotiations with a handful of buyers set much of the year's outcome.

The case for

Buyers argue that this is a toll booth on American beverage consumption: exclusive territorial rights to the strongest soft-drink brands, a delivery network no one is going to duplicate, and demand that barely notices the economic cycle. They point to fiscal 2025, when net sales rose 4.8% to $7,228.1 million and income from operations rose 3.3% to $950.7 million with volume essentially flat, as evidence that the company can price ahead of its costs. They also note that the still category, up 6.1%, is growing faster than sparkling, up 3.5%, giving the mix somewhere to go, and that the heavy capital spending on plants and distribution is behind a business that converts steadily into cash.

The case against

Sellers fear a business that is squeezed from both ends. Upstream, roughly 85% of volume is The Coca-Cola Company's product, supplied by a single counterparty that sets concentrate prices and imposes requirements whose breach can cost the distribution rights; downstream, Walmart and Kroger together are 29% of net sales and negotiate hard. They also point out that fiscal 2025 growth came from price rather than cases — volume was up 0.3% — which raises the question of how many more rounds of price increases consumers will absorb, and note the company's own disclosures on shifting preferences around sugar, artificial ingredients and obesity, on regulation including SNAP eligibility, and on the cost and availability of aluminium, resin, sweetener and fuel, all of which hit a fixed-price case directly.

Generated on September 18, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on September 18, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

P/E: 16.6Score: 61Market cap: $174.91B

Coca-Cola Consolidated's 10-K names local bottlers of PepsiCo products as its principal competitors, and PepsiCo's own company-owned bottling and direct-store-delivery operations fight for the same supermarket, convenience-store and foodservice shelf space across its 14-state territory.

P/E: 30.6Score: 63Market cap: $42.02B

The 10-K cites local bottlers of Dr Pepper products among its principal competitors: in the territories Coca-Cola Consolidated does not carry those brands, Keurig Dr Pepper's own distribution network competes for the same beverage shelf and the same consumer occasions.

Pepsi Bottling Ventures LLCNot tracked

A privately held Pepsi bottler operating 17 production and distribution sites in North Carolina, South Carolina, Maryland and Delaware — the same core territory where Coca-Cola Consolidated sells, so the two compete store by store for the same retail accounts.

G&J Pepsi-Cola Bottlers, Inc.Not tracked

A family-owned independent Pepsi bottler with 13 locations across Ohio and Kentucky, states that overlap Coca-Cola Consolidated's Mid-Atlantic and Mid-West regions, where both companies deliver soft drinks to the same grocers and restaurants.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$7.69B

Trailing 12 months (through 7/3/2026)

Net Income

$550M

Trailing 12 months (through 7/3/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$620M

Total Equity

$-740M

Total Liabilities

$5.04B

Current Ratio

1.21

Interest Coverage

-

Debt/EBITDA

2.29

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

General caseUndervalued

Fair Value

$492.61

Current Price

$190.26

Margin of Safety

+61.4%

Fair Value Range

$320.20 - $665.02

Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.

Estimation Methods

Analyst price target:Not enough data to compute it
Discounted cash flow (DCF):$1099.07
Earnings multiple (P/E):$159.62
Graham growth formula:$56.40
Earnings power value (EPV):$108.42
Justified P/B:$161.52
Dividend discount (Gordon):$31.15
P/FFO, funds from operations:$1200.59
Mid-cycle earnings:$706.80
Revenue multiple:$118.67
Analyst Consensus:Sell (0B / 3H / 3S)

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

22.95

ROE

-77.1%

P/B Ratio

-

P/FCF

3.00

Gross Margin

39.1%

ROIC

24.8%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

24.8%

WACC

6.6%

ROIC − WACC

+18.2 pp

ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (15)

  • Price CAGR 26.49%
  • ROIC 24.8%
  • Gross Margin 39.1%
  • P/FCF 3.00
  • Operating Margin 13.0%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • DCF valuation (Undervalued)
  • ROE 39.6%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 7.6%
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.72
  • Piotroski F-Score 5/9

Failed (5)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR -11.06%
  • CapEx intensity
  • Analyst Consensus 0% Buy
  • Net Margin Trend 7.2% vs 8.4%

Unavailable (8)

  • P/B Ratio NaN
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Interest Coverage
  • Price below Graham Number
  • Earnings Surprise (no valid data)
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)
  • Share Dilution (missing shares data)

Piotroski F-Score

5/9

Mixed signals: some areas need attention

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

1.72

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

-

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Institutional Holdings

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. J. Frank Harrison IIIChairman & CEO70
Mr. David Michael KatzPresident, COO & Director56
Mr. Matthew Joseph BlickleyCFO & Chief Accounting Officer43
Mr. E. Beauregarde Fisher IIIChief Legal, Administrative Officer & Corporate Secretary56
Mr. Robert G. ChamblessExecutive VP and Senior Advisor to the Chairman & CEO59
Mr. Ellison C. GlennChief Sales and Service Officer & Director34
Mr. Nathaniel Brent TollisonChief People & Public Affairs Officer51
Mr. Donell W. EtheridgeChief Supply Chain Officer56
Ms. Christine A. MotherwellChief Customer Officer46
Mr. Joshua L. DorminyExecutive VP and Assistant to the Chairman & CEO47

Audit Risk

5

Board Risk

10

Compensation Risk

2

Shareholder Rights Risk

10

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Documents

  • Annual Report (10-K)

    A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.

    Filed on 2026-02-18

    View document
  • Quarterly Report (10-Q)

    A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.

    Filed on 2026-08-05

    View document
  • Current Report (8-K)

    An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.

    Filed on 2026-08-05

    View document

via SEC EDGAR

Income History

via SEC EDGAR

Latest News

Recent headlines for COKE, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 5/15/2026POSITIVE
    If You Invested $100 In Coca-Cola Consolidated Stock 10 Years Ago, You Would Have This Much Today

    An investment of $100 in Coca-Cola Consolidated (COKE) stock a decade ago would have yielded a substantial return, illustrating the company's long-term growth trajectory. While specific figures are not provided in the prompt, the article's premise suggests significant capital appreciation and potential dividend reinvestment. This historical performance underscores COKE's resilience and ability to generate value for shareholders over extended periods, making it a noteworthy consideration for long-term investors focused on the beverage sector.

  • 4/27/2026NEUTRAL
    Here's How Much $100 Invested In Coca-Cola Consolidated 10 Years Ago Would Be Worth Today

    An investment of $100 in Coca-Cola Consolidated Inc. (COKE) ten years ago would have grown to approximately $1,300 today, assuming reinvestment of dividends. This represents a significant compound annual growth rate, highlighting the stock's strong performance over the past decade. The company's consistent returns underscore its stability and ability to generate shareholder value, making it a noteworthy consideration for long-term investors focused on consumer staples.

  • 4/13/2026POSITIVE
    Here's How Much You Would Have Made Owning Coca-Cola Consolidated Stock In The Last 5 Years

    An investment in Coca-Cola Consolidated Inc. (COKE) stock over the past five years would have yielded substantial returns. While specific figures are not provided in the excerpt, the title implies significant positive performance, suggesting that shareholders have benefited from the company's growth and market position. This historical performance indicates strong operational execution and potentially favorable market conditions for the beverage sector, making COKE an attractive option for long-term investors seeking consistent capital appreciation and potential dividend income.

via Markets Gazette