Back to rankings

Danaher Corp (DHR)

Overvalued
HealthcareDiagnostics & ResearchUnited States

Fundamental

61

Price

$220.13

Market Cap

$159.81B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Danaher is a US-based science and technology group that sells instruments, consumables, software and services to the people who discover, manufacture and test medicines and who diagnose disease. It describes itself as a company committed to accelerating the power of science and technology to improve human health, and it runs three reportable segments — Biotechnology, Life Sciences and Diagnostics — bound together by its own operating method, the Danaher Business System (DBS). Its customers are pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, contract manufacturers, academic and government research laboratories, hospitals, physicians' offices and reference laboratories. Danaher has historically grown by acquiring businesses and applying DBS to them, and the 10-K treats acquisitions as a core part of the strategy rather than an occasional event.

How it makes money

Danaher sells an installed base of equipment and instruments and then earns most of its money from what that installed base consumes: reagents, cell culture media, chromatography resins, filters, antibodies, test cartridges, plus service contracts and software. The 2025 annual report states that 82% of revenues were recurring and 18% non-recurring, with the recurring share at 88% in Biotechnology, 89% in Diagnostics and 66% in Life Sciences. In practice the equipment is the entry point and the consumable stream that follows it, often written into a customer's validated manufacturing or clinical process, is the business.

Revenue by segment

Diagnostics40.5%

Clinical instruments, consumables, software and services that hospitals, physicians' offices and reference laboratories use to diagnose disease — molecular diagnostics plus clinical lab, acute care and pathology.

Life Sciences29.9%

Instruments, consumables, services and software used to study the basic building blocks of life — DNA, RNA, proteins and cells — including flow cytometry, mass spectrometry and microscopy, antibodies and nucleic acids, and filtration and separation products. Buyers are academic, government and industrial researchers and pharmaceutical developers.

Biotechnology29.7%

Equipment, consumables, software and services used to research, develop, manufacture and deliver biological medicines — bioprocessing materials such as cell culture media, chromatography resins and filtration, sold to pharmaceutical and biotech companies and contract manufacturers.

Competitive moat

Switching costs · Wide

Danaher's advantage rests on how hard its consumables are to remove once adopted. A bioprocessing resin, filter or culture medium is written into a drug maker's regulated manufacturing process and changing it can mean re-validation and regulatory filings; a diagnostics instrument in a hospital lab runs on its own proprietary test cartridges. The financial trace of this is in the filing itself: 82% of 2025 revenues were recurring, 88% in Biotechnology and 89% in Diagnostics. The 10-K is candid that the company still faces intense competition and that its growth depends on developing and commercialising new products, so the advantage is not absolute — it is strongest where the customer's own process is locked around Danaher's consumable.

What drives demand

Moderately cyclical

The three segments behave differently over the cycle. Diagnostics follows testing volumes in hospitals and laboratories, which move with population health needs more than with the economy, and the company reports 89% of that segment's revenue as recurring. Biotechnology follows how much biological medicine is actually being manufactured, plus how freely pharmaceutical and biotech customers are spending on capacity and inventory — a driver that swings, and whose swing shows up first in orders for equipment rather than in consumables. Life Sciences is the most exposed to capital spending: it has the lowest recurring share, 66%, and depends on instrument purchases by academic, government and industrial laboratories, which are postponed when research budgets tighten. The company itself lists conditions in the global economy, healthcare cost-reduction pressure and geopolitical factors among the things that can hurt results.

Key risks

  • Conditions in the global economy and in the markets served — The company states that conditions in the global economy, in the particular markets it serves and in financial markets can adversely affect its business and financial statements.
  • Intense competition — Danaher says it faces intense competition and that, if unable to compete effectively, it may experience decreased demand and decreased market share.
  • Dependence on new product development — Growth depends on the timely development and commercialisation, and on customer acceptance, of new and enhanced products and services based on technological innovation.
  • Cost pressure in healthcare — The healthcare industry and related industries the company serves are undergoing significant changes to reduce, and make more predictable, their costs, which can adversely affect Danaher's business and financial statements.
  • Geopolitical, political and compliance factors — Economic, political, geopolitical, legal, compliance, social and business factors — including the impact of military conflicts — both inside and outside the United States can negatively affect the business and financial statements.
  • Artificial intelligence — The company flags that uncertainties in the development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence in its business and its products may result in harm to its business and reputation.
  • Acquisitions and divestitures — Risks include an inability to consummate acquisitions at the historical rate and at appropriate prices, difficulties in integrating what is acquired, and divestitures or other dispositions that could negatively impact the business — including tax liabilities arising from spin-offs.
  • IT systems and security breaches — Significant disruptions in, or breaches in the security of, the company's information technology systems are disclosed as an operational risk.
  • Product defects and manufacturing problems — Defects, manufacturing problems, unanticipated use of products or inadequate disclosure about them are disclosed as a risk — a live issue for a company selling regulated medical devices and diagnostics.
  • Cost and availability of supplies — Financial results are subject to fluctuations in the cost and availability of supplies, alongside dependence on business partners and other third parties for the development, supply or marketing of certain products and technologies.
  • Intellectual property — Any inability to adequately protect its intellectual property, or to avoid third-party infringement claims, is disclosed as a risk; the filing also notes government rights over certain IP.
  • Debt, currency and goodwill — Outstanding debt has at times increased significantly as a result of acquisitions; results can also be affected by foreign currency exchange rates, by tax liabilities and by goodwill impairment.
  • Regulation, litigation and environmental liability — The company discloses risks from changes in regulation, from litigation, from medical device regulation specifically, and from environmental liabilities.
  • Global health crises — Global health crises, pandemics, epidemics or other outbreaks can adversely impact certain elements of the business and financial statements.

Customer concentration

The 2025 10-K does not disclose a customer concentration figure: there is no statement that any single customer accounted for a stated percentage of revenues, and no top-customer table. What the filing does describe is a customer base spread across pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, contract manufacturers, academic and government laboratories, hospitals, physicians' offices and reference laboratories, in the United States and abroad. The filing does state that no single supplier is material to the company, but that is about suppliers, not customers. Read this as 'not disclosed' rather than as evidence of low concentration.

The case for

Buyers argue that Danaher has turned itself into a razor-and-blade business on top of regulated science: 82% of 2025 revenues were recurring, and 88-89% in Biotechnology and Diagnostics, because the consumables are embedded in customers' validated manufacturing and clinical processes and are awkward to replace. They point to the spread across three segments serving drug discovery, drug manufacturing and clinical diagnosis, so that weakness in one — research capital spending, say — need not sink the group. They add that the Danaher Business System and a long record of acquiring and improving businesses give management a repeatable way to deploy cash, and that the underlying demand, more biological medicines being developed and more tests being run, is not tied to the economic cycle in the way an industrial order book would be.

The case against

Sellers fear that the growth engine has slowed: the company itself says its growth depends on developing and commercialising new products, that it faces intense competition, and that its customers' industries are being reshaped to cut costs — pressure that lands on prices. They worry about the part of the business that is not recurring, particularly Life Sciences at 66% recurring, where instrument purchases can be deferred whenever research and capital budgets tighten, and about a bioprocessing customer base whose own spending swings with drug-development funding. They also point to the acquisition machine as a dependency rather than a strength: the filing lists the inability to buy at the historical rate and at appropriate prices, integration difficulties, debt that has risen significantly after acquisitions, and goodwill impairment among its own risks. Regulatory exposure as a medical device maker, foreign currency, and the absence of any disclosed customer concentration figure to reassure on that front round out the list.

Generated on September 18, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on September 18, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

P/E: 36.3Score: 68Market cap: $250.91B

Thermo Fisher sells across all three of Danaher's segments — bioprocessing consumables, lab instruments and reagents, and clinical diagnostics — to the same pharmaceutical, biotech and hospital-laboratory customers.

P/E: 27.7Score: 65Market cap: $175.89B

Abbott competes head-on with Danaher's Beckman Coulter, Radiometer and Cepheid lines in hospital core-lab chemistry and immunoassay, blood-gas testing and point-of-care molecular diagnostics.

P/E: 33.9Score: 72Market cap: $49.40B

Agilent overlaps Danaher's Life Sciences brands SCIEX, Phenomenex and Leica in mass spectrometry, chromatography and laboratory instrumentation sold to pharma R&D and applied-testing labs.

Sartorius AGNot tracked

Sartorius is the closest rival to Danaher's Cytiva and Pall businesses, supplying the single-use bioreactors, filtration and chromatography products that biologics manufacturers buy for the same production lines.

Roche Holding AGNot tracked

Roche Diagnostics bids for the same hospital and reference-laboratory contracts as Beckman Coulter and Cepheid, covering clinical chemistry, immunoassay, molecular testing and tissue diagnostics.

Merck KGaA (MilliporeSigma)Not tracked

Merck KGaA's Life Science division supplies filtration, purification and cell-culture media to the same biologics manufacturers that Danaher serves through Cytiva and Pall.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$25.11B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/26/2026)

Net Income

$4.00B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/26/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$5.26B

Total Equity

$52.53B

Total Liabilities

$30.92B

Current Ratio

1.65

Interest Coverage

17.56

Debt/EBITDA

3.47

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

General caseOvervalued

Fair Value

$161.39

Current Price

$220.13

Margin of Safety

-36.4%

Fair Value Range

$104.90 - $217.88

Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.

Estimation Methods

Analyst price target:$230.83
Discounted cash flow (DCF):$165.45
Earnings multiple (P/E):$136.76
Graham growth formula:$41.96
Earnings power value (EPV):$64.76
Justified P/B:$56.21
Dividend discount (Gordon):$26.47
P/FFO, funds from operations:Not enough data to compute it
Mid-cycle earnings:$120.02
Revenue multiple:$139.80
Analyst Consensus:Strong Buy (27B / 5H / 0S)
Last Earnings Surprise:+4.68%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

39.28

ROE

6.9%

P/B Ratio

2.96

P/FCF

28.49

Gross Margin

58.5%

ROIC

4.8%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

4.8%

WACC

7.6%

ROIC − WACC

-2.8 pp

ROIC is below the cost of capital — the company is destroying value for every dollar invested.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (20)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • Price CAGR 11.24%
  • Gross Margin 58.5%
  • P/FCF 28.49
  • P/B Ratio 2.96
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 20.4%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • Current Ratio
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • ROE 7.7%
  • Analyst Consensus 84% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 5.3%
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.66
  • Share Dilution -2.9%
  • Net Margin Trend 15.9% vs 14.2%
  • Piotroski F-Score 5/9

Failed (6)

  • EPS CAGR 1.04%
  • ROIC 4.8%
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 2.0%

Unavailable (2)

  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)

Piotroski F-Score

5/9

Mixed signals: some areas need attention

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

1.66

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

-2.9%

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Institutional Holdings

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Steven M. RalesCo-Founder & Chairman74
Mr. Rainer M. BlairPresident, CEO & Director61
Mr. Mitchell P. RalesCo-Founder & Director68
Dr. Jose-Carlos Gutierrez-Ramos Ph.D.Senior VP & Chief Science Officer63
Mr. Matthew R. McGrewExecutive Vice President53
Mr. Christopher Paul RileyExecutive VP of Biotechnology Group & CEO of Cytiva51
Ms. Julie Sawyer MontgomeryExecutive Vice President of Diagnostics Platform53
Mr. Matthew E. Gugino C.F.A., CPAExecutive VP & CFO42
Mr. Christopher M. BoudaVP & Chief Accounting Officer-
Ms. Rachel Marie Vatnsdal OlsonVice President of Investor Relations-

Audit Risk

6

Board Risk

10

Compensation Risk

5

Shareholder Rights Risk

2

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Documents

  • Annual Report (10-K)

    A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.

    Filed on 2026-02-24

    View document
  • Quarterly Report (10-Q)

    A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.

    Filed on 2026-07-21

    View document
  • Current Report (8-K)

    An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.

    Filed on 2026-08-03

    View document

via SEC EDGAR

Income History

via SEC EDGAR

Latest News

Recent headlines for DHR, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 5/22/2026POSITIVE
    Danaher Raises $3 Billion in Record Private-Placement Bond Sale

    Danaher Corporation successfully closed a record-breaking $3 billion private-placement bond sale. This significant capital raise indicates strong investor confidence in the company's financial health and future prospects. The substantial funding could be allocated towards strategic investments, acquisitions, or debt reduction, potentially enhancing shareholder value. For investors, this event signals robust operational performance and a proactive approach to financial management, which may lead to a positive re-evaluation of the stock.

  • 4/21/2026NEUTRAL
    Danaher Q1 Earnings Beat Estimates, But Revenue Miss, Weak Diagnostics Weigh On Stock

    Danaher Corporation reported Q1 earnings per share of $2.05, surpassing the $1.90 consensus estimate. However, revenue for the quarter was $5.96 billion, falling short of the $6.01 billion expected by analysts. The company's bioprocessing segment showed strong growth, but this was offset by weakness in the diagnostics division. Furthermore, Danaher lowered its outlook for the respiratory market. This mixed performance, with earnings beating but revenue missing and specific segment concerns, presents a complex picture for investors.

via Markets Gazette