Evercore Inc (EVR)
Fair ValueFundamental
75
Price
$257.50
Market Cap
$10.06B
Part 1 · What the company is worth
Overview
Evercore is an independent investment bank: it sells advice, not balance sheet. Its bankers advise corporations, boards, governments and financial sponsors on mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, restructurings and capital raising, and its Evercore ISI unit provides equity research and agency trading to institutional investors. Because the firm does no commercial lending and no proprietary trading, it presents itself as free of the conflicts that sit inside a universal bank. A much smaller Investment Management arm runs wealth management and trust services for high-net-worth families. At the end of 2025 the firm had roughly 2,570 employees in 33 cities, of whom about 171 were Investment Banking Senior Managing Directors — the people who actually carry the client relationships.
How it makes money
Almost all revenue is transaction fees. Advisory fees are largely earned when a deal actually closes — announcement retainers exist but the bulk of the money arrives at completion — so a mandate that dies leaves the work unpaid. Underwriting fees come from equity and debt offerings the firm helps place; commissions come from agency equity trading and from research subscriptions. Only the small Investment Management segment earns the recurring kind of income, a percentage fee on assets under management, which stood at $15.5 billion at the end of 2025. In 2025 advisory fees were $3,267.1 million of $3,855.8 million of total net revenues, with underwriting fees of $179.6 million, commissions and related revenue of $242.7 million, asset management and administration fees of $87.4 million and other revenue of $79.0 million.
Revenue by segment
Strategic advice on mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, restructurings and shareholder matters, plus underwriting, private placements, agency equity trading and equity research sold to corporations, boards, financial sponsors and institutional investors.
Wealth management and fiduciary services for high-net-worth families through Evercore Wealth Management and Evercore Trust Company, plus minority interests in other asset managers; $15.5 billion of assets under management at year-end 2025.
Competitive moat
Brand · NarrowWhat Evercore sells is trust in a name and in a few dozen individual bankers. The independent-advisor positioning — no lending, no proprietary trading, therefore no conflict — is a genuine reason boards call the firm for the largest and most sensitive transactions, and a reputation of that kind takes decades to build. But it is a thin moat: the assets walk out of the building every evening, competitors bid for those same bankers with large packages, and the 10-K itself flags both the dependence on senior professionals and the growing legal difficulty of enforcing restrictive covenants. There are no switching costs — every mandate is won again from scratch.
What drives demand
CyclicalDemand is the M&A cycle itself, and that cycle swings hard. Boards buy companies when financing is cheap and available, when valuations feel settled enough to agree a price, and when confidence is high; all three disappear together in a downturn, and fee income can fall by a third or more with almost no warning. The restructuring practice is the one counterweight — it gets busy precisely when advisory work on acquisitions dries up — but it is far too small to offset the swing. Evercore's own 2025 was the up-leg of that cycle: net revenues rose 29% to a record, with adjusted advisory fees up 34%.
Key risks
- Difficult market conditions can cut revenue quickly — The company discloses that downturns, tighter credit and geopolitical shocks reduce both the number and the size of transactions, and that the timing of M&A activity is outside its control.
- Dependence on senior professionals — Revenue rests on a limited group of senior bankers, analysts and portfolio managers. Competitors offer attractive packages, departures can take client relationships with them, and enforcing restrictive covenants is becoming harder in several states.
- Fees depend on deals actually closing — Advisory revenue is largely contingent on completion. A transaction can fail because financing disappears, regulators object, a board says no or markets turn — and the work already done goes unpaid.
- Largely fixed cost base — Occupancy, technology and administrative expenses do not fall with revenue, so a weaker year compresses profitability, and expansion into new markets requires spending before it produces anything.
- Growth strains operations and compliance — Rapid expansion pressures operational, legal and compliance systems, and the company says it must keep investing in technology and people without assurance that those systems will scale.
- Competition in the equities business — The equities operation competes with universal banks and specialist firms that have greater resources and broader product ranges.
Customer concentration
The 10-K does not disclose any customer concentration figure, and Evercore does not identify a client that accounts for a material share of revenue. The economically relevant concentration is different in kind: fees are episodic and lumpy, and a handful of very large mandates can account for a disproportionate part of a given year's advisory revenue — the company attributed much of 2025's increase to revenue earned from large transactions. That is transaction concentration, not client concentration, and the filing puts no number on it.
The case for
Buyers argue that the independent advisory model keeps taking share from universal banks, because a firm with no lending relationship and no trading book can sit on the sensitive side of a board's table without explaining a conflict. They point to a business that needs almost no capital and carries no credit risk, so cash converts to dividends and buybacks rather than to a balance sheet; to the record 2025, when net revenues rose 29% and Evercore advised on five of the fifteen largest announced transactions of the year; and to a hiring machine that keeps adding Senior Managing Directors, each of whom is expected to pay for himself or herself over a full cycle. In their reading, the firm is buying talent cheaply in weak years and harvesting it in strong ones.
The case against
Sellers fear that a record year is the wrong place to extrapolate from. Advisory fees arrive only when deals close, the cost base is largely fixed, and compensation is the dominant expense — so in a downturn revenue falls faster than costs and margins fall faster still, while the firm still has to pay to keep bankers it cannot afford to lose. They note that the whole franchise walks out the door every evening: the company itself lists dependence on senior professionals as a risk and says restrictive covenants are getting harder to enforce, and a departing team can take client relationships with it. They also see the concentration of a single business line — 98% of revenue from Investment Banking & Equities in 2025, with the Investment Management arm too small to steady anything — and no switching costs anywhere in the model, since each mandate must be won again from the start against Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and every other independent boutique.
Generated on September 18, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
Generated on September 18, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users
Houlihan Lokey competes for the same independent advisory work, dominating mid-market M&A and restructuring mandates that Evercore also pursues, plus fairness opinions for the same boards.
Lazard is the other large listed independent advisory house, selling the same conflict-free M&A, restructuring and sovereign advice to big corporate and government clients on both sides of the Atlantic.
PJT Partners competes for the same advisory mandates, above all in restructuring and liability management, where it and Evercore are routinely on opposite sides of the same creditor or debtor table.
Moelis chases the same fee pool of independent M&A and restructuring mandates and names Evercore as a competitor in its own annual report.
Centerview is the private boutique that most often sits opposite Evercore on the largest US board-level merger assignments, competing for the same handful of mega-deal mandates.
Perella Weinberg sells the same senior, independent M&A and restructuring advice to large corporate clients in the US and Europe, and is named by Evercore among its direct rivals.
Balance Sheet & Liquidity
Revenue
$4.74B
Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)
Net Income
$745M
Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)
Free Cash Flow
$1.18B
Total Equity
$2.03B
Total Liabilities
$3.04B
Current Ratio
2.47
Interest Coverage
-
Debt/EBITDA
-
Earnings Per Share
Revenue & Net Income
Free Cash Flow
Income Breakdown
Historical statement
Margins over time
Debt over time
How heavy the debt is
Growth grid
Growth — Revenue
Fair Value Estimation
Fair Value
$303.31
Current Price
$257.50
Margin of Safety
+15.1%
Fair Value Range
$200.11 - $406.52
Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.
Estimation Methods
Valuation Metrics
P/E Ratio
14.52
ROE
29.1%
P/B Ratio
5.33
P/FCF
6.09
Gross Margin
-
ROIC
-
Profitability Radar
Value Creation (Economic Moat)
ROIC
-
WACC
11.7%
ROIC − WACC
-
Fundamental Analysis Criteria
Passed (18)
- EPS shows upward trend
- Price CAGR 15.14%
- P/FCF 6.09
- Debt/Equity ratio
- Positive Free Cash Flow
- CapEx intensity
- Current Ratio
- Return on Tangible Assets
- Low reliance on intangibles
- ROE 39.8%
- Revenue Growth 5Y 11.2%
- Analyst Consensus 60% Buy
- Earnings Surprise avg 20.6%
- PEG Ratio 1.20
- Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 2.24
- Share Dilution 1.1%
- Net Margin Trend 15.7% vs 14.2%
- Piotroski F-Score 5/9
Failed (3)
- P/B Ratio 5.33
- Price below Graham Number
- DCF valuation (Unknown)
Unavailable (6)
- ROIC NaN%
- Gross Margin NaN%
- Dividend Payout NaN%
- Operating Margin NaN%
- Interest Coverage
- Debt/EBITDA
Piotroski F-Score
Mixed signals: some areas need attention
Earnings Quality
High quality: earnings backed by cash
Share Dilution
Share count is stable
Institutional Holdings
Governance
Executive Team
| Name | Title | Age |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Roger Charles Altman | Founder & Senior Chairman | 79 |
| Mr. John S. Weinberg | Chairman & CEO | 68 |
| Mr. Timothy Gilbert LaLonde M.B.A., M.Sc. | Senior MD & CFO | 63 |
| Mr. Jason Klurfeld J.D. | Senior MD, Corporate Secretary & General Counsel | 52 |
| Mr. Matthew Lindsey-Clark | Co-Head of EMEA Investment Banking, Global Adv. Europe & Sr. MD of Strategic Advisory of London | 62 |
| Mr. Paul Pensa CPA | Senior Managing Director, Chief Accounting Officer & Controller | - |
| Mr. David Kamo | Senior MD of Strategic Advisory of New York & Senior MD in Investment Banking | - |
| Mr. Sandeep Saini | Senior MD & Chief Information Officer | - |
| Ms. Katy Haber | Senior MD, Head of Investor Relations & ESG | - |
| Ms. Jamie Easton | Senior MD, Head of Communications & External Affairs | 46 |
Audit Risk
7
Board Risk
5
Compensation Risk
7
Shareholder Rights Risk
6
Part 2 · The price and when to enter
This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.
Documents
- View document
Annual Report (10-K)
A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.
Filed on 2026-02-20
- View document
Quarterly Report (10-Q)
A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.
Filed on 2026-08-05
- View document
Current Report (8-K)
An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.
Filed on 2026-07-29
via SEC EDGAR
Income History
via SEC EDGAR
Latest News
Recent headlines for EVR, sourced from Markets Gazette.
- 7d agoPOSITIVEPerché questa società di storage è salita del 13% ed è stata la migliore dell'S&P 500
Evercore Inc. shares surged 13% on Thursday, making it the top performer in the S&P 500. This significant gain follows its inclusion in the S&P 500 earlier this month and comes as investors assess the company's long-term growth prospects. Evercore reaffirmed its revenue guidance for fiscal year 2027 at $5.03-$5.07 billion, representing 37%-38% year-over-year growth. Furthermore, preliminary targets for fiscal year 2028 exceeded analyst consensus, indicating strong future performance expectations. The company also anticipates a non-GAAP operating income of $940-$960 million. This positive outlook and strong guidance are likely to attract further investor interest.
via Markets Gazette