Back to rankings

Franklin Electric Co., Inc. (FELE)

Fair Value
IndustrialsSpecialty Industrial MachineryUnited States

Fundamental

64

Price

$95.20

Market Cap

$4.24B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Franklin Electric makes and sells the equipment that moves fluids: submersible motors, pumps, drives and electronic controls for water, and pumping, containment and monitoring systems for fuel stations. Its water products sit in residential wells, farm irrigation, municipal supply, industrial plants and wastewater systems; its energy products sit under and around service-station forecourts. Alongside manufacturing, the company owns Headwater Companies, a chain of wholesale groundwater distributors that sells pumps, tanks and well supplies to water-well contractors across the United States — so Franklin Electric both builds the hardware and, in its home market, controls part of the channel that installs it. Consolidated net sales were $2,131.3 million in fiscal 2025, with roughly a quarter to a third of Water Systems revenue coming from developing markets.

How it makes money

Revenue is almost entirely the one-time sale of physical goods, recognised when the product ships or is delivered. There is no subscription or licence layer. Two things soften the transactional nature of the model: a very large installed base of pumps and motors that eventually fail and are replaced — replacement demand that the homeowner or farmer cannot postpone indefinitely — and the Distribution arm, which resells Franklin Electric products and third-party brands at wholesale margins and turns inventory frequently. Pricing is a lever the company uses openly: management attributed part of the 5% sales increase in 2025 to price realisation alongside acquisitions and volume.

Revenue by segment

Water Systems53.1%

Submersible motors, pumps, drives, electronic controls and water treatment equipment for groundwater, water transfer and wastewater, sold to residential, agricultural, municipal and industrial end markets through wholesale distributors and OEMs worldwide.

Distribution32.9%

The Headwater Companies, a group of wholly owned wholesale groundwater distributors that sell pumps, tanks, well supplies and related products — Franklin Electric's own and third-party brands — to professional water-well contractors in the United States.

Energy Systems14%

Fuel pumping systems, fuel containment, piping, vapour recovery and monitoring and control systems for service stations and fuel handling, plus products serving power reliability and telecommunications infrastructure.

Competitive moat

Scale · Narrow

Franklin Electric describes itself as a global leader in groundwater and fuel pumping systems, and the practical advantage is distribution and installed base rather than technology. Water-well contractors specify the brands their wholesaler stocks and their crews already know how to service; the company reinforces that by owning a large slice of the US wholesale channel through Headwater. Decades of shipped motors create a replacement stream that follows the original brand. But the moat is narrow, not wide: the filing names Grundfos, Pentair and Xylem in water and Vontier and Dover in fuel, and states plainly that some competitors have substantially greater financial resources, with competitive factors capable of driving down both volumes and prices.

What drives demand

Moderately cyclical

Demand sits between defensive and cyclical, and the two halves of the business behave differently. When a well pump fails, the household or farm that depends on it replaces it immediately, regardless of the economy — that replacement stream is the floor. On top of it sits a genuinely cyclical layer: new housing starts, farm income and irrigation spending, municipal and industrial capital budgets, and energy and mining activity that tracks commodity prices. Energy Systems adds a compliance-driven rhythm, because environmental rules can force station operators to retrofit equipment within a narrow window. Layered on all of this is seasonality: Northern Hemisphere demand peaks between April and August and the first quarter is structurally the weakest as drilling slows.

Key risks

  • Housing starts drive part of the demand — The company states that demand for certain of its products is affected by housing starts. A slowdown in residential construction reduces the number of new wells drilled and pumps installed, and the resulting drop in volume can compress gross margins because fixed manufacturing costs are spread over fewer units.
  • Exposure to the energy and mining cycle — Purchases of Franklin Electric products depend on how the industries its customers operate in are performing. Global macroeconomic conditions in energy and mining, including commodity price swings, influence capital spending on dewatering and fuel handling equipment and can move sales in either direction.
  • Raw material prices and supply disruption — Significant increases in commodity prices or disruptions in the supply chain could push product costs up. The company can try to pass this through in price, but there is no guarantee customers accept it, and the timing gap between a cost increase and a price increase lands on margins.
  • Trade policy and tariffs — Franklin Electric manufactures and sells across many countries. Changes in foreign trade policy and tariff actions could, in the company's own words, have a material adverse effect on its financial statements in any particular reporting period.
  • Municipal water systems replacing private wells — Where municipal water networks expand, or where regulation restricts groundwater withdrawal, individual and private well systems decline. The company warns that such a decline would reduce demand for its products and hurt sales — a structural, slow-moving threat rather than a cyclical one.
  • Environmental rules reshape the fuel business — Environmental legislation can create demand for certain Energy Systems products that must then be supplied in a relatively short time frame — a compliance-driven surge that is hard to plan for, and that fades once the retrofit deadline passes.
  • Competition and price pressure — The markets are competitive and some rivals have substantially greater financial resources. The company states that competitive factors may lead to declines in the sales or in the prices of its products.
  • Acquisitions may not deliver — Growth partly depends on buying companies — acquisitions contributed to 2025 sales growth. The filing lists acquisition strategy among its risks: targets may not be found on acceptable terms, integration may not work, and goodwill and intangible assets carried from past deals may have to be written down.
  • Seasonality and weather — Water Systems demand follows warm weather, peaking from April to August in the Northern Hemisphere, so the first quarter is structurally weaker as well drilling slows. Weather-related disasters also swing residential and agricultural demand.
  • Changes in distribution outlets — The company may change its distribution outlets in certain markets based on market share and growth, and acknowledges that such changes could adversely impact sales and operating results. Owning part of the channel cuts both ways: it also means decisions about who sells the product are internal ones with real consequences.
  • Multinational operations and currency — Operating in many countries brings political, economic and operational risk, including difficulty enforcing agreements and collecting receivables through foreign legal systems. Reported results are also exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, which can mask or exaggerate underlying volume trends.

Customer concentration

The filing states that no single customer accounted for over 10 percent of net sales in 2025, 2024 or 2023, and it does not disclose a combined share for the largest customers. Sales are spread across wholesale distributors, OEMs, municipalities and, through the Distribution segment, thousands of independent water-well contractors — so the customer base is fragmented rather than concentrated.

The case for

Buyers argue that water is the most non-negotiable input there is, and that Franklin Electric sells the hardware that moves it: when a pump fails, it gets replaced. They point to a company that grew net sales 5 percent to $2,131.3 million in 2025 while lifting operating income from $243.6 million to $269.0 million, with gross margin holding at 35.5 percent — evidence that price increases stuck. They note that 25 to 30 percent of Water Systems revenue comes from developing markets, where the company reports compounded sales growth in the high single digits and where groundwater infrastructure is still being built out. They see owning the Headwater distribution network as a structural advantage over rivals who must rent access to the same contractors. And they treat the steady stream of bolt-on acquisitions, which contributed to 2025 growth, as a repeatable use of cash in a fragmented industry.

The case against

Sellers fear that this is a mature industrial with a thin structural edge. The company itself writes that some competitors have substantially greater financial resources and that competitive factors may drive down sales or prices; in water it faces Grundfos, Pentair and Xylem, in fuel Vontier and Dover. Roughly a third of revenue comes from the Distribution segment, which is wholesale resale — lower-margin work that flatters the top line more than the bottom one. Demand is tied to housing starts, farm spending and the energy and mining cycle, none of which management controls, and the company warns that the spread of municipal water networks and restrictions on groundwater withdrawal would structurally shrink the private well market it serves. Growth leans on acquisitions, which brings integration risk and a goodwill balance that could be written down. And tariffs and commodity prices sit outside the model entirely: the filing concedes trade actions could materially hurt the financial statements in any given period.

Generated on September 18, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on September 18, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

P/E: 24.1Score: 68Market cap: $23.56B

Named by Franklin Electric in its 10-K as a principal competitor in specialty water products, Xylem sells groundwater and residential pumps through the Goulds Water Technology brand to the same well drillers and water dealers.

P/E: 22.5Score: 64Market cap: $25.79B

Also named in the 10-K as a petroleum equipment competitor, Dover's OPW and Wayne Fueling businesses supply nozzles, containment and dispensing equipment to the same service-station and fuel-distribution customers.

Pentair plcPNR

Cited by Franklin Electric as a principal competitor, Pentair offers residential and agricultural water pumps and water treatment systems to the same homeowners, farms and distribution channels.

Grundfos Holding A/SNot tracked

The third competitor Franklin Electric names in its 10-K: this Danish foundation-owned group builds submersible and circulator pumps for wells, buildings and utilities, competing head-on worldwide even though it is not listed.

Vontier CorporationVNT

Franklin Electric identifies Vontier as a principal competitor in petroleum equipment: through Gilbarco Veeder-Root it sells fuel dispensers, tank monitoring and site control systems to the same fuel-station operators served by Franklin Fueling Systems.

The Gorman-Rupp CompanyGRC

A US pump maker that sells into the same agricultural, municipal water and wastewater applications, competing for the same contractors and distributors as Franklin Electric's Water Systems segment.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$2.18B

Trailing 12 months (through 3/31/2026)

Net Income

$150M

Trailing 12 months (through 3/31/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$194M

Total Equity

$1.32B

Total Liabilities

$619M

Current Ratio

2.67

Interest Coverage

24.47

Debt/EBITDA

0.88

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

General caseFairly Valued

Fair Value

$95.94

Current Price

$95.20

Margin of Safety

+0.8%

Fair Value Range

$69.69 - $122.20

Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.

Estimation Methods

Analyst price target:$118.50
Discounted cash flow (DCF):$116.14
Earnings multiple (P/E):$67.18
Graham growth formula:$78.64
Earnings power value (EPV):$48.70
Justified P/B:$37.21
Dividend discount (Gordon):$18.95
P/FFO, funds from operations:$76.04
Mid-cycle earnings:$116.83
Revenue multiple:$140.72
Analyst Consensus:Buy (7B / 4H / 0S)
Last Earnings Surprise:+5.53%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

28.88

ROE

11.1%

P/B Ratio

3.16

P/FCF

25.00

Gross Margin

35.2%

ROIC

13.3%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

13.3%

WACC

9.7%

ROIC − WACC

+3.7 pp

ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (18)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • Price CAGR 9.49%
  • ROIC 13.3%
  • Gross Margin 35.2%
  • P/FCF 25.00
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 12.5%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • ROE 11.6%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 11.3%
  • Analyst Consensus 64% Buy
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.45
  • Share Dilution -2.2%
  • Piotroski F-Score 5/9

Failed (9)

  • EPS CAGR 3.15%
  • P/B Ratio 3.16
  • CapEx intensity
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • Earnings Surprise avg 0.0%
  • PEG Ratio 3.23
  • Net Margin Trend 6.9% vs 8.8%

Unavailable (1)

  • Dividend Payout NaN%

Piotroski F-Score

5/9

Mixed signals: some areas need attention

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

1.45

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

-2.2%

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Institutional Holdings

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Joseph A. RuzynskiCEO & Director49
Ms. Jennifer A. WolfenbargerVP & CFO50
Mr. Jonathan M. GrandonVP, Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary49
Mr. DeLancey W. DavisVP & President of Headwater Companies59
Mr. Gregory Michael LevineVP & President of Global Water Systems51
Mr. Brent L. SpikesVice President of Global Operations53
Mr. Dean CantrellDirector of Investor Relations-
Mr. Jay J. WalshVP & President of Energy Systems55

Audit Risk

3

Board Risk

1

Compensation Risk

3

Shareholder Rights Risk

5

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Documents

  • Annual Report (10-K)

    A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.

    Filed on 2026-02-20

    View document
  • Quarterly Report (10-Q)

    A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.

    Filed on 2026-07-29

    View document
  • Current Report (8-K)

    An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.

    Filed on 2026-09-08

    View document

via SEC EDGAR

Income History

via SEC EDGAR

Latest News

Recent headlines for FELE, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for FELE.