Back to rankings

Comfort Systems USA Inc (FIX)

Fair Value
IndustrialsEngineering & ConstructionUnited States

Fundamental

76

Price

$1654.09

Market Cap

$58.36B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Comfort Systems USA is a United States contractor that installs, maintains, repairs and replaces the mechanical and electrical systems inside commercial, industrial and institutional buildings: heating, ventilation and air conditioning, plumbing, piping, building controls, electrical power and fire protection. It also builds parts of those systems off-site, in its own plants, and ships them to the job — modular skids and prefabricated assemblies that are dropped into place, which matters most on very large projects. The company operates through roughly 190 locations across the country, run as a decentralized federation of local operating companies rather than as a single centralized contractor, and it has grown substantially by acquiring those companies. Revenue was $9.10 billion in fiscal 2025, up from $7.03 billion in 2024, and backlog at 31 December 2025 stood at $11.94 billion against $5.99 billion a year earlier.

How it makes money

Money comes in two shapes. The larger part is project work: the company signs installation contracts — either 'design and build', where it engineers the system itself, or 'plan and spec', where it bids on someone else's drawings — and recognises revenue as costs are incurred against the total expected cost of the job. Most of these contracts are fixed-price, which means the price is agreed up front and any cost overrun comes out of Comfort Systems' own margin. The smaller part is service: multi-year maintenance agreements that renew automatically, plus repair and emergency calls billed on time and materials. In fiscal 2025 about 92.7% of revenue came from installation-type work and 7.3% from maintenance, repair and replacement services. Cut a different way, 63.2% of revenue came from work in newly constructed facilities and 36.8% from renovation, expansion, maintenance, repair and replacement in buildings that already exist.

Revenue by segment

Mechanical Services73.3%

HVAC, plumbing, piping, building automation and controls, off-site modular fabrication and fire protection, installed and serviced for owners and general contractors of commercial, industrial and institutional buildings.

Electrical Services26.7%

Electrical power distribution, wiring, lighting and related systems for the same kind of buildings; this is the faster-growing of the two segments and carries much of the work tied to large technology and data-centre projects.

Competitive moat

Scale · Narrow

What Comfort Systems has is size in a business where almost everyone else is small: a national network of about 190 locations, a payroll of skilled tradespeople that a new entrant cannot simply hire, surety bonding capacity that lets it take on jobs competitors cannot bond, and off-site fabrication plants that let it deliver a giant project on a schedule a local contractor could not hold. On the largest and most complex work, that combination genuinely narrows the field of who can bid. It should not be mistaken for a wide moat. The company's own filing describes competition as intense and notes that in many of its markets barriers to entry are low, because the work is local, bid job by job, and priced against whoever else shows up. There are no long-term contracted revenues on the installation side: the backlog is large, but each project ends.

What drives demand

Cyclical

Demand follows non-residential construction, which rises and falls with the economy, with credit conditions and with the willingness of owners to commit capital; the company lists economic downturns and cyclicality among its own risk factors. Two things soften the swing. About 36.8% of 2025 revenue came from work on existing buildings — renovation, expansion, maintenance, repair and replacement — which is driven by equipment wearing out and by regulation rather than by new construction decisions, and a long backlog means today's revenue reflects orders taken many months ago. What dominates the current cycle is end-market mix: technology customers, chiefly large data-centre and semiconductor projects, accounted for 45.0% of 2025 revenue and manufacturing for 22.1%, so the company's near-term volume is tied far more to one capital-spending wave than to the broad building cycle.

Key risks

  • Cost overruns on fixed-price contracts — Most contracts fix the price before the work starts, and the company bears the risk that labour, materials or schedule turn out worse than estimated. Revenue is recognised on a cost-to-cost basis, so an error in the estimate of total job cost distorts reported profit until it is discovered.
  • Dependence on a small number of very large customers — The company discloses that a single customer accounted for about 12.8% of consolidated 2025 revenue, that its largest customer changes from year to year, and that losing a major customer or a major project could materially hurt results.
  • Backlog is not guaranteed revenue — Booked work can be cancelled, scaled back or delayed by customers, and the amounts in backlog can be adjusted. A record backlog therefore does not translate one-for-one into future revenue or profit.
  • Attracting and keeping skilled labour — The business runs on trained mechanical and electrical tradespeople and on the local managers who supervise them. The company identifies difficulty in recruiting and retaining qualified people — and the cost of paying for them — as a constraint on its ability to take on and execute work.
  • Economic downturns and construction cyclicality — Demand depends on non-residential construction activity, which the company describes as cyclical and sensitive to the general economy, to inflation and to interest rates; a downturn reduces the volume of projects put out to bid and pressures pricing.
  • Acquisitions, decentralisation and goodwill — Growth has come partly through buying local contractors, which are then run with considerable autonomy. The filing flags the risk of failing to integrate acquisitions, the risk inherent in a decentralised management structure, and the risk that the goodwill carried from past acquisitions is impaired.
  • Reliance on subcontractors and on surety bonding — Part of the work is performed by third-party subcontractors whose failure to perform falls back on Comfort Systems, and many contracts require performance bonds; a reduction in available bonding capacity would limit the work the company can accept.

Customer concentration

Top customers account for 12.8% of revenue

The filing states that in 2025 one customer represented approximately 12.8% of consolidated revenue, and that the identity of the largest customer changes from year to year. It does not disclose a combined figure for the top five or ten customers. The wider exposure is by end market rather than by name: technology customers made up 45.0% of 2025 revenue, so a slowdown in large data-centre and semiconductor construction would hit a large share of the book even though it is spread across several account names.

The case for

Buyers argue that Comfort Systems sits in the physical bottleneck of the data-centre build-out: the power and cooling inside the building have to be engineered and installed by someone, and very few contractors have the skilled headcount, the off-site fabrication capacity and the bonding to take on projects of that size. They point to backlog doubling from $5.99 billion at the end of 2024 to $11.94 billion at the end of 2025 — $11.58 billion of it on a same-store basis, so not merely bought through acquisitions — as evidence that the work is already committed rather than hoped for, and to revenue rising from $7.03 billion to $9.10 billion with net income roughly doubling to $1.02 billion as evidence that the company is converting that demand at better margins than it used to. They add that the company generated $1.19 billion of operating cash flow in 2025, that it keeps buying local contractors at modest multiples, and that the 36.8% of revenue from existing buildings gives it something to fall back on.

The case against

Sellers fear that this is a fixed-price construction business enjoying an unusually good moment, and that both words matter. Technology customers were 45.0% of 2025 revenue and one customer alone was 12.8%: if the data-centre spending wave slows, a large block of work does not renew, and the backlog that looks like safety is work that ends rather than revenue that recurs — the company itself warns that backlog can be cancelled, delayed or adjusted. They note that the margins being earned today were earned in a market where customers are desperate for capacity, and that when capacity catches up the bidding gets competitive again, in an industry the filing describes as intensely competitive with low barriers to entry in many local markets. They add that with fixed-price contracts the estimating risk sits entirely with the contractor, that a shortage of skilled tradespeople caps how much work can actually be executed, and that a long record of acquisitions leaves goodwill on the balance sheet that a downturn could force the company to write down.

Generated on September 18, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on September 18, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

P/E: 23.5Score: 82Market cap: $33.77B

EMCOR is the closest national peer, bidding for the same mechanical and electrical construction and building-service contracts in U.S. commercial, industrial and institutional facilities, including the data-center work that now drives both companies.

P/E: 14.3Score: 78Market cap: $6.40B

Through its Commercial & Industrial and Infrastructure Solutions segments, IES bids on the same electrical and mechanical design-build packages for data centers and industrial plants that Comfort Systems' electrical segment pursues.

P/E: 48.3Score: 72Market cap: $16.57B

APi competes for the same recurring building-systems service and fire-protection contracts on commercial and industrial properties, the maintenance and retrofit revenue that makes up over forty percent of Comfort Systems' work.

Limbach Holdings, Inc.LMB

Limbach installs and services the same HVAC, plumbing and controls systems in non-residential buildings, competing for the same owner-direct maintenance and retrofit work in overlapping Midwest, Mid-Atlantic and Southeast metro markets.

Everus Construction Group, Inc.ECG

Everus' Electrical & Mechanical segment performs the same commercial and industrial MEP installation work, competing for data-center, manufacturing and institutional projects across the same U.S. regions.

Southland IndustriesNot tracked

Southland is the largest privately held mechanical contractor in the United States and competes head-on for the same design-build HVAC and plumbing packages on large healthcare, education and mission-critical projects.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$3.96B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Net Income

$1.43B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$1.03B

Total Equity

$2.45B

Total Liabilities

$3.99B

Current Ratio

1.21

Interest Coverage

79.13

Debt/EBITDA

1.36

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

General caseFairly Valued

Fair Value

$1743.38

Current Price

$1654.09

Margin of Safety

+5.1%

Fair Value Range

$1299.42 - $2187.35

Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.

Estimation Methods

Analyst price target:$2197.00
Discounted cash flow (DCF):$1377.39
Earnings multiple (P/E):$1163.07
Graham growth formula:$2099.87
Earnings power value (EPV):$309.33
Justified P/B:$367.09
Dividend discount (Gordon):$21.54
P/FFO, funds from operations:$493.24
Mid-cycle earnings:$149.74
Revenue multiple:$905.74
Analyst Consensus:Strong Buy (14B / 2H / 0S)
Last Earnings Surprise:+18.66%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

40.70

ROE

41.8%

P/B Ratio

18.09

P/FCF

26.95

Gross Margin

27.5%

ROIC

15.8%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

15.8%

WACC

13.3%

ROIC − WACC

+2.5 pp

ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (22)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 24.29%
  • Price CAGR 48.11%
  • ROIC 15.8%
  • P/FCF 26.95
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 18.8%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • Current Ratio
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • ROE 53.5%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 26.1%
  • Analyst Consensus 88% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 35.0%
  • PEG Ratio 0.84
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.78
  • Share Dilution -1.1%
  • Net Margin Trend 36.2% vs 9.0%
  • Piotroski F-Score 8/9

Failed (5)

  • Gross Margin 27.5%
  • P/B Ratio 18.09
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)

Unavailable (1)

  • Dividend Payout NaN%

Piotroski F-Score

8/9

Strong financial health

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

1.78

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

-1.1%

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Institutional Holdings

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Brian E. LaneCEO & Director68
Mr. Trent T. McKenna J.D.President52
Mr. William George IIIExecutive VP & CFO60
Mr. Terrence M. ReedSenior VP & Chief Human Resources Officer65
Ms. Laura Finley Howell J.D.Senior Executive Advisor37
Mr. Craig SasserChief Operating Officer64
Ms. Julie S. Shaeff C.P.A.Senior VP & Chief Accounting Officer59
Ms. Rachel R. EslickerSenior VP, General Counsel & Secretary34
Mr. R. Dean TillisonRegional President-
Brian EvansRegional President-

Audit Risk

9

Board Risk

3

Compensation Risk

5

Shareholder Rights Risk

9

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Documents

  • Annual Report (10-K)

    A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.

    Filed on 2026-02-19

    View document
  • Quarterly Report (10-Q)

    A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.

    Filed on 2026-07-23

    View document
  • Current Report (8-K)

    An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.

    Filed on 2026-08-03

    View document

via SEC EDGAR

Income History

via SEC EDGAR

Latest News

Recent headlines for FIX, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 4/24/2026POSITIVE
    Here's How Much You Would Have Made Owning Comfort Systems USA Stock In The Last 10 Years

    Comfort Systems USA (FIX) stock has delivered a remarkable performance over the past decade, generating substantial returns for its shareholders. While specific figures are not provided in this snippet, the title implies a significant positive trend in its stock price. Investors who held FIX shares for the last 10 years would have likely seen considerable capital appreciation, underscoring the company's operational success and market position. This historical performance suggests strong underlying business fundamentals and effective management, making it a noteworthy stock for long-term investment consideration.

  • 3/10/2026NEUTRAL
    Comfort Systems USA Unusual Options Activity

    Unusual options activity has been detected for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX). While the specific nature of this activity (e.g., call or put volume, strike prices, expiration dates) is not detailed, significant deviations from typical trading patterns in options markets can sometimes precede notable price movements in the underlying stock. Investors should monitor further developments and consider this activity as a potential indicator of increased market interest or speculative positioning, without a clear directional bias on its own.

  • 2/23/2026NEUTRAL
    Here's How Much You Would Have Made Owning Comfort Systems USA Stock In The Last 5 Years

    A retrospective analysis highlights the remarkable performance of Comfort Systems USA stock over the last five years, providing investors with a picture of past returns. The article, which is purely informational, calculates the profit an investment in the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) services provider would have generated. While this historical data is impressive and reflects the company's solid growth, it does not introduce new information or catalysts for the market. Traders view such analyses as confirmation of a trend already priced into current valuations. Therefore, the article does not provide a basis for new operational decisions but rather serves as a case study on the success of a long-term investment in the mechanical and construction services sector.

via Markets Gazette