Volver a la clasificación

Bentley Systems, Incorporated (BSY)

Valor Justo
TechnologySoftware - ApplicationUnited States

Fundamental

75

Precio

$32.60

Capitalización Bursátil

$9.64B

Parte 1 · Cuánto vale la empresa

Resumen

Bentley Systems makes the software engineers use to design and manage physical infrastructure: roads, bridges, water networks, power grids, railways and buildings. Its programs let a team draft a bridge in 3D, model how a water network will behave, and keep a digital record of an asset over its decades of service. Customers are mostly engineering firms and the government agencies and utilities that own the infrastructure, in construction and heavy industry sectors where mistakes are expensive and projects take years.

Cómo genera ingresos

Nearly all revenue now comes from subscriptions rather than one-time software licenses: 92% of 2025 revenue was subscription-based, paid on a recurring basis regardless of how much a customer actually uses the software that quarter. A small remaining share is perpetual licenses and professional services. Because engineering teams design entire projects inside Bentley's software and store years of asset data in it, subscriptions tend to renew rather than get cancelled once adopted.

Ingresos por segmento

Subscriptions92%

Recurring software licenses covering Bentley's design, modeling and infrastructure-management applications, the core and fastest-growing part of revenue.

Professional services6%

Implementation, training and consulting work sold alongside the software, a shrinking share of the total.

Perpetual licenses2%

One-time software license sales, a legacy model Bentley has largely phased out in favor of subscriptions.

Ventaja competitiva

Costes de cambio · Estrecha

An infrastructure project's design files, models and years of asset data live inside Bentley's software, and engineering teams are trained on its specific tools; moving a large, ongoing infrastructure program to a rival platform means retraining staff and migrating irreplaceable project history. The advantage is real but not absolute, since Autodesk and other established players compete directly for the same infrastructure-engineering budgets.

Qué impulsa la demanda

Moderadamente cíclico

A large share of Bentley's customers are governments and regulated utilities funding long-lived infrastructure programs, spending that is planned years ahead and less sensitive to a single bad quarter than typical corporate IT budgets. The remaining private-sector engineering and construction demand is more cyclical, rising and falling with construction activity and interest rates that affect project financing.

Riesgos clave

  • Competition from larger rivals — Bentley competes against Autodesk and other large, well-resourced software companies in several of its core markets, including public-works and facilities design, which can pressure pricing and win rates.
  • Currency exposure from global operations — A significant share of revenue and costs is denominated in currencies other than the US dollar, so exchange-rate movements can affect reported results even when underlying demand is unchanged.
  • Dependence on continued subscription renewals — With subscriptions now the large majority of revenue, results depend on customers renewing rather than switching platforms or delaying software spending during a construction-sector downturn.

Concentración de clientes

Bentley does not disclose concentration among individual customers; its revenue is spread across a large number of engineering firms, government agencies and utilities worldwide, with no single buyer material to overall results.

Los argumentos a favor

Buyers argue that infrastructure spending by governments and utilities is a multi-decade need largely insulated from short-term economic swings, that the shift to subscriptions has made revenue more predictable and recurring, and that deeply embedded design software is hard to displace once an engineering team's projects and history live inside it.

Los argumentos en contra

Sellers worry that Autodesk and other well-capitalized competitors can keep chipping away at Bentley's core infrastructure-design markets, that a slowdown in construction activity or public infrastructure budgets would eventually show up in subscription growth, and that currency swings across Bentley's many international markets add volatility to reported results.

Written by the editors, published on 18 de agosto de 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on 18 de septiembre de 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

P/E: 27.1Score: 69Market cap: $44.17B

Autodesk is the competitor Bentley names most often in its own 10-K, selling design and BIM software to the same engineering firms and owner-operators for public works, utilities, buildings and project delivery.

P/E: 32.8Score: 52Market cap: $13.45B

Trimble sells design, survey and construction-management software to the same civil-infrastructure and building customers Bentley targets in its Public Works/Utilities and Commercial/Facilities segments.

Hexagon ABNot tracked

Hexagon competes with Bentley across reality capture, geospatial and plant-design software sold to infrastructure, industrial and mining operators.

AVEVA Group Limited (unit of Schneider Electric SE)Not tracked

AVEVA is Bentley's main rival in plant-design and asset-performance software for process plants, refineries and utilities.

Nemetschek SENot tracked

Nemetschek's design and BIM brands compete for the same architecture, structural and facilities customers Bentley serves in its Commercial/Facilities business.

Dassault Systèmes SENot tracked

Dassault Systèmes competes for industrial and resources engineering customers with its 3D design and lifecycle-management platform.

Balance y Liquidez

Ingresos

$1.60B

Últimos 12 meses (hasta 30/6/2026)

Beneficio Neto

$290M

Últimos 12 meses (hasta 30/6/2026)

Flujo de Caja Libre

$520M

Patrimonio Neto Total

$1.19B

Pasivo Total

$2.37B

Ratio de Liquidez

0.59

Cobertura de Intereses

19.70

Deuda/EBITDA

2.71

Beneficio Por Acción

Ingresos y Beneficio Neto

Flujo de Caja Libre

Desglose de Ingresos

Estado histórico

Márgenes en el tiempo

La deuda en el tiempo

Cuánto pesa la deuda

Cuadro de crecimiento

Crecimiento — Ingresos

Estimación de Valor Justo

Caso generalValoración Justa

Valor Justo

$30.26

Precio Actual

$32.60

Margen de Seguridad

-7.7%

Rango de Valor Justo

$19.67 - $40.85

Dispersión entre los métodos de valoración utilizados, no un intervalo de confianza calibrado estadísticamente.

Métodos de Estimación

Precio objetivo de los analistas:$44.00
Flujo de caja descontado (DCF):Datos insuficientes para calcularlo
Múltiplo sobre beneficios (P/E):$19.12
Fórmula de crecimiento de Graham:$29.81
Valor de la capacidad de generar beneficios (EPV):$9.18
P/B justificado:$12.75
Descuento de dividendos (Gordon):$4.72
P/FFO, fondos de operaciones:Datos insuficientes para calcularlo
Beneficios de mitad de ciclo:Datos insuficientes para calcularlo
Múltiplo sobre ingresos:$25.64
Consenso de Analistas:Compra Fuerte (16B / 5H / 0S)
Última Sorpresa de Resultados:+9.65%

Métricas de Valoración

Ratio P/E

35.50

ROE

23.4%

Ratio P/B

7.72

P/FCF

18.62

Margen Bruto

81.8%

ROIC

11.5%

Radar de Rentabilidad

Creación de Valor (Ventaja Competitiva)

ROIC

11.5%

WACC

9.1%

ROIC − WACC

+2.4 pp

El ROIC supera el coste del capital: la empresa está creando valor para los accionistas.

Criterios de Análisis Fundamental

Superado (20)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 8.19%
  • ROIC 11.5%
  • Gross Margin 81.8%
  • P/FCF 18.62
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 23.6%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • ROE 24.1%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 13.4%
  • Analyst Consensus 76% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 3.9%
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.80
  • Share Dilution 0.2%
  • Net Margin Trend 18.1% vs 17.9%
  • Piotroski F-Score 9/9

Fallido (7)

  • Price CAGR -3.50%
  • P/B Ratio 7.72
  • Current Ratio
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Unknown)
  • PEG Ratio 2.28

No disponible (1)

  • Dividend Payout NaN%

Piotroski F-Score

9/9

Solidez financiera fuerte

score
criteria

Calidad de los Beneficios

1.80

Alta calidad: beneficios respaldados por efectivo

Dilución de Acciones

0.2%

El número de acciones es estable

Participaciones institucionales

Gobernanza

Equipo Directivo

NombreCargoEdad
Mr. Gregory S. BentleyPresident & Executive Chairman of the Board69
Mr. Nicholas H. CuminsCEO & Director48
Mr. Keith Arthur BentleyFounder, Technology Advisor, Executive VP & Director66
Mr. Barry Joe Bentley Ph.D.Co-Founder & Director59
Mr. Werner Andre CPAChief Financial Officer54
Mr. James LeeChief Operating Officer45
Mr. David R. Shaman J.D.Chief Legal Officer & Secretary59
Mr. Thomas F. TrimbackChief Accounting Officer & Global Controller-
Mr. Julien MoutteChief Technology Officer46
Ms. Ruth SleeterChief Information Officer-

Riesgo de Auditoría

2

Riesgo del Consejo

10

Riesgo de Compensación

7

Riesgo de Derechos del Accionista

10

Parte 2 · El precio y el momento de entrar

Esta parte no sirve para saber si la empresa vale: sirve para elegir cuándo comprarla, una vez que los fundamentales te han convencido. Dentro: análisis técnico, potencial, caídas históricas, exposición gamma.

Documentos

  • Informe anual (10-K)

    Un resumen anual del negocio, los resultados financieros y los riesgos de la empresa.

    Presentado el 2026-02-26

    Ver documento
  • Informe trimestral (10-Q)

    Una actualización del desempeño financiero de los últimos tres meses.

    Presentado el 2026-08-06

    Ver documento
  • Informe de hecho relevante (8-K)

    Un aviso sobre un hecho relevante, como un cambio de dirección o un anuncio importante.

    Presentado el 2026-09-11

    Ver documento

via SEC EDGAR

Historial de Resultados

via SEC EDGAR

Latest News

Recent headlines for BSY, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for BSY.