Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE)
InfravaloradaFundamental
71
Precio
$191.27
Capitalización Bursátil
$12.60B
Parte 1 · Cuánto vale la empresa
Resumen
Coca-Cola Consolidated is the largest Coca-Cola bottler in the United States. It is not the company that owns the Coca-Cola brands: it buys concentrates and syrups, manufactures, packages, sells and delivers the finished drinks inside exclusive territories. The 10-K for fiscal 2025 describes a footprint covering 14 states and the District of Columbia, around 60 million consumers, 10 manufacturing plants and about 60 distribution centres, organised in four regions (Carolinas, Mid-Atlantic, Mid-South, Mid-West). Roughly 85% of bottle/can sales volume to retail customers is made up of The Coca-Cola Company's products; the rest is mostly third-party brands it also distributes, such as Monster Energy and Dr Pepper products. Net sales were $7,228.1 million in fiscal 2025, up 4.8% on the prior year.
Cómo genera ingresos
Revenue comes almost entirely from selling physical cases of beverages to retailers — supermarkets, club and value stores, convenience stores — plus vending and foodservice fountain (post-mix) sales. The company earns the spread between the price it charges retailers and its cost of concentrate, packaging, sweetener and delivery, so results move with two levers: price per case and case volume. In fiscal 2025 net sales grew 4.8% while standard physical case volume rose 0.3%, with management attributing the growth mainly to pricing actions taken in the first quarter. Smaller revenue lines include sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers, post-mix sales, transportation revenue from the Red Classic trucking subsidiaries and equipment maintenance revenue.
Ingresos por segmento
Carbonated soft drinks — Coca-Cola, Sprite, Fanta and similar brands — sold in bottles and cans to retail chains, convenience stores and foodservice customers. Fiscal 2025 net sales were $4,249.8 million, up 3.5%, driven mainly by multi-pack take-home packages in large store, club and value channels.
Non-carbonated drinks in bottles and cans: water, sports drinks, teas, juices and energy brands including Monster Energy. Fiscal 2025 net sales were $2,362.9 million, up 6.1%, with the company citing performance in large retail and convenience stores.
Everything that is not a bottle or can sold to retail: sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers, fountain/post-mix syrup, freight revenue from the Red Classic trucking subsidiaries and equipment maintenance. Fiscal 2025 net sales of $615.4 million, the difference between total net sales of $7,228.1 million and bottle/can sales of $6,612.7 million.
Ventaja competitiva
Patentes y licencias · EstrechaThe durable advantage is contractual and geographic: beverage agreements with The Coca-Cola Company give exclusive rights to make and distribute those brands inside defined territories, and no competing Coca-Cola bottler can sell into them. On top of that sits a delivery network — 10 plants, roughly 60 distribution centres and its own trucking arm — that a newcomer could not rebuild for a low-priced, heavy, frequently delivered product. The limit is that the advantage is borrowed rather than owned: the brands belong to The Coca-Cola Company, which sets concentrate prices, and the agreements carry requirements whose breach can cost the distribution rights. That is why the moat is real but narrow.
Qué impulsa la demanda
DefensivoVolumes are tied to everyday grocery and convenience purchases rather than to big-ticket spending, so they move within a narrow band across the cycle: in fiscal 2025 standard physical case volume rose 0.3% while net sales rose 4.8%, the difference coming from price. Growth therefore depends far more on whether price increases stick than on the economy accelerating. Weather and the summer season shift sales between quarters, and the exposure that does behave cyclically is the away-from-home side — foodservice, convenience and fountain — which softens when people eat out less, while take-home packages at large retailers hold up.
Riesgos clave
- Cost, shortage or disruption of raw materials, fuel and supplies — The company states that its business and results of operations may be adversely affected by increased costs or by disruption, unavailability or shortages of raw materials, fuel and other supplies. Aluminium, resin, sweetener and diesel all enter the cost of a case that is sold at a price set well in advance with large retailers.
- Reliance on purchased finished products — A disclosed risk factor says reliance on purchased finished products from external sources could adversely affect profitability: part of what the company sells it does not make itself, and it depends on other parties' capacity, quality and pricing.
- Shifts in consumer perception and preferences — The filing flags that changes in public and consumer perception and preferences — including concerns about product safety, sustainability, artificial ingredients, brand reputation and obesity — could reduce demand for its products and reduce profitability.
- Regulation of nonalcoholic beverages — A further risk factor covers changes in government regulation of nonalcoholic beverages, including rules on obesity and public health, artificial ingredients, recycling and sustainability, product safety and benefit programmes such as SNAP, any of which could reduce demand and profitability.
- Loss of a single large customer — The company discloses that the loss of Walmart Inc. or of The Kroger Co. as a customer could have a material adverse effect on its operating and financial results. Walmart alone is about 21% of bottle/can sales volume and 17% of net sales, Kroger about 15% of volume and 12% of net sales.
- Dependence on The Coca-Cola Company and its beverage agreements — Approximately 85% of bottle/can sales volume to retail customers consists of products of The Coca-Cola Company, which is the sole supplier of those products or of the concentrates and syrups needed to make them. The beverage agreements impose requirements on the company, and failure to meet them could result in the loss of distribution rights for the products concerned.
Concentración de clientes
Los principales clientes representan el 29% de los ingresos
Two retailers dominate the customer list. Walmart Inc. accounts for approximately 21% of total bottle/can sales volume and 17% of total net sales; The Kroger Co. accounts for approximately 15% of volume and 12% of net sales. Together they are 36% of bottle/can volume and 29% of net sales, and the company states that losing either could materially hurt its results. Concentration of this size also means annual price negotiations with a handful of buyers set much of the year's outcome.
Los argumentos a favor
Buyers argue that this is a toll booth on American beverage consumption: exclusive territorial rights to the strongest soft-drink brands, a delivery network no one is going to duplicate, and demand that barely notices the economic cycle. They point to fiscal 2025, when net sales rose 4.8% to $7,228.1 million and income from operations rose 3.3% to $950.7 million with volume essentially flat, as evidence that the company can price ahead of its costs. They also note that the still category, up 6.1%, is growing faster than sparkling, up 3.5%, giving the mix somewhere to go, and that the heavy capital spending on plants and distribution is behind a business that converts steadily into cash.
Los argumentos en contra
Sellers fear a business that is squeezed from both ends. Upstream, roughly 85% of volume is The Coca-Cola Company's product, supplied by a single counterparty that sets concentrate prices and imposes requirements whose breach can cost the distribution rights; downstream, Walmart and Kroger together are 29% of net sales and negotiate hard. They also point out that fiscal 2025 growth came from price rather than cases — volume was up 0.3% — which raises the question of how many more rounds of price increases consumers will absorb, and note the company's own disclosures on shifting preferences around sugar, artificial ingredients and obesity, on regulation including SNAP eligibility, and on the cost and availability of aluminium, resin, sweetener and fuel, all of which hit a fixed-price case directly.
Generated on 18 de septiembre de 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
Generated on 18 de septiembre de 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users
Coca-Cola Consolidated's 10-K names local bottlers of PepsiCo products as its principal competitors, and PepsiCo's own company-owned bottling and direct-store-delivery operations fight for the same supermarket, convenience-store and foodservice shelf space across its 14-state territory.
The 10-K cites local bottlers of Dr Pepper products among its principal competitors: in the territories Coca-Cola Consolidated does not carry those brands, Keurig Dr Pepper's own distribution network competes for the same beverage shelf and the same consumer occasions.
A privately held Pepsi bottler operating 17 production and distribution sites in North Carolina, South Carolina, Maryland and Delaware — the same core territory where Coca-Cola Consolidated sells, so the two compete store by store for the same retail accounts.
A family-owned independent Pepsi bottler with 13 locations across Ohio and Kentucky, states that overlap Coca-Cola Consolidated's Mid-Atlantic and Mid-West regions, where both companies deliver soft drinks to the same grocers and restaurants.
Balance y Liquidez
Ingresos
$7.69B
Últimos 12 meses (hasta 3/7/2026)
Beneficio Neto
$550M
Últimos 12 meses (hasta 3/7/2026)
Flujo de Caja Libre
$620M
Patrimonio Neto Total
$-740M
Pasivo Total
$5.04B
Ratio de Liquidez
1.21
Cobertura de Intereses
-
Deuda/EBITDA
2.29
Beneficio Por Acción
Ingresos y Beneficio Neto
Flujo de Caja Libre
Desglose de Ingresos
Estado histórico
Márgenes en el tiempo
La deuda en el tiempo
Cuánto pesa la deuda
Cuadro de crecimiento
Crecimiento — Ingresos
Estimación de Valor Justo
Valor Justo
$492.61
Precio Actual
$191.27
Margen de Seguridad
+61.2%
Rango de Valor Justo
$320.20 - $665.02
Dispersión entre los métodos de valoración utilizados, no un intervalo de confianza calibrado estadísticamente.
Métodos de Estimación
Métricas de Valoración
Ratio P/E
22.95
ROE
-77.1%
Ratio P/B
-
P/FCF
3.00
Margen Bruto
39.1%
ROIC
24.8%
Radar de Rentabilidad
Creación de Valor (Ventaja Competitiva)
ROIC
24.8%
WACC
6.6%
ROIC − WACC
+18.2 pp
El ROIC supera el coste del capital: la empresa está creando valor para los accionistas.
Criterios de Análisis Fundamental
Superado (15)
- Price CAGR 26.49%
- ROIC 24.8%
- Gross Margin 39.1%
- P/FCF 3.00
- Operating Margin 13.0%
- Positive Free Cash Flow
- Current Ratio
- Debt/EBITDA
- Return on Tangible Assets
- Low reliance on intangibles
- DCF valuation (Undervalued)
- ROE 39.6%
- Revenue Growth 5Y 7.6%
- Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.72
- Piotroski F-Score 5/9
Fallido (5)
- EPS shows upward trend
- EPS CAGR -11.06%
- CapEx intensity
- Analyst Consensus 0% Buy
- Net Margin Trend 7.2% vs 8.4%
No disponible (8)
- P/B Ratio NaN
- Dividend Payout NaN%
- Debt/Equity ratio
- Interest Coverage
- Price below Graham Number
- Earnings Surprise (no valid data)
- PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)
- Share Dilution (missing shares data)
Piotroski F-Score
Señales mixtas: algunas áreas requieren atención
Calidad de los Beneficios
Alta calidad: beneficios respaldados por efectivo
Dilución de Acciones
Recomprando acciones. Favorable para el accionista
Participaciones institucionales
Gobernanza
Equipo Directivo
| Nombre | Cargo | Edad |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. J. Frank Harrison III | Chairman & CEO | 70 |
| Mr. David Michael Katz | President, COO & Director | 56 |
| Mr. Matthew Joseph Blickley | CFO & Chief Accounting Officer | 43 |
| Mr. E. Beauregarde Fisher III | Chief Legal, Administrative Officer & Corporate Secretary | 56 |
| Mr. Robert G. Chambless | Executive VP and Senior Advisor to the Chairman & CEO | 59 |
| Mr. Ellison C. Glenn | Chief Sales and Service Officer & Director | 34 |
| Mr. Nathaniel Brent Tollison | Chief People & Public Affairs Officer | 51 |
| Mr. Donell W. Etheridge | Chief Supply Chain Officer | 56 |
| Ms. Christine A. Motherwell | Chief Customer Officer | 46 |
| Mr. Joshua L. Dorminy | Executive VP and Assistant to the Chairman & CEO | 47 |
Riesgo de Auditoría
5
Riesgo del Consejo
10
Riesgo de Compensación
2
Riesgo de Derechos del Accionista
10
Parte 2 · El precio y el momento de entrar
Esta parte no sirve para saber si la empresa vale: sirve para elegir cuándo comprarla, una vez que los fundamentales te han convencido. Dentro: análisis técnico, potencial, caídas históricas, exposición gamma.
Documentos
- Ver documento
Informe anual (10-K)
Un resumen anual del negocio, los resultados financieros y los riesgos de la empresa.
Presentado el 2026-02-18
- Ver documento
Informe trimestral (10-Q)
Una actualización del desempeño financiero de los últimos tres meses.
Presentado el 2026-08-05
- Ver documento
Informe de hecho relevante (8-K)
Un aviso sobre un hecho relevante, como un cambio de dirección o un anuncio importante.
Presentado el 2026-08-05
via SEC EDGAR
Historial de Resultados
via SEC EDGAR
Latest News
Recent headlines for COKE, sourced from Markets Gazette.
- 5/15/2026POSITIVEIf You Invested $100 In Coca-Cola Consolidated Stock 10 Years Ago, You Would Have This Much Today
An investment of $100 in Coca-Cola Consolidated (COKE) stock a decade ago would have yielded a substantial return, illustrating the company's long-term growth trajectory. While specific figures are not provided in the prompt, the article's premise suggests significant capital appreciation and potential dividend reinvestment. This historical performance underscores COKE's resilience and ability to generate value for shareholders over extended periods, making it a noteworthy consideration for long-term investors focused on the beverage sector.
- 4/27/2026NEUTRALHere's How Much $100 Invested In Coca-Cola Consolidated 10 Years Ago Would Be Worth Today
An investment of $100 in Coca-Cola Consolidated Inc. (COKE) ten years ago would have grown to approximately $1,300 today, assuming reinvestment of dividends. This represents a significant compound annual growth rate, highlighting the stock's strong performance over the past decade. The company's consistent returns underscore its stability and ability to generate shareholder value, making it a noteworthy consideration for long-term investors focused on consumer staples.
- 4/13/2026POSITIVEHere's How Much You Would Have Made Owning Coca-Cola Consolidated Stock In The Last 5 Years
An investment in Coca-Cola Consolidated Inc. (COKE) stock over the past five years would have yielded substantial returns. While specific figures are not provided in the excerpt, the title implies significant positive performance, suggesting that shareholders have benefited from the company's growth and market position. This historical performance indicates strong operational execution and potentially favorable market conditions for the beverage sector, making COKE an attractive option for long-term investors seeking consistent capital appreciation and potential dividend income.
via Markets Gazette