Voltar à classificação

Bentley Systems, Incorporated (BSY)

Valor Justo
TechnologySoftware - ApplicationUnited States

Fundamental

75

Preço

$31.95

Capitalização de Mercado

$9.64B

Parte 1 · Quanto vale a empresa

Visão Geral

Bentley Systems makes the software engineers use to design and manage physical infrastructure: roads, bridges, water networks, power grids, railways and buildings. Its programs let a team draft a bridge in 3D, model how a water network will behave, and keep a digital record of an asset over its decades of service. Customers are mostly engineering firms and the government agencies and utilities that own the infrastructure, in construction and heavy industry sectors where mistakes are expensive and projects take years.

Como gera receita

Nearly all revenue now comes from subscriptions rather than one-time software licenses: 92% of 2025 revenue was subscription-based, paid on a recurring basis regardless of how much a customer actually uses the software that quarter. A small remaining share is perpetual licenses and professional services. Because engineering teams design entire projects inside Bentley's software and store years of asset data in it, subscriptions tend to renew rather than get cancelled once adopted.

Receita por segmento

Subscriptions92%

Recurring software licenses covering Bentley's design, modeling and infrastructure-management applications, the core and fastest-growing part of revenue.

Professional services6%

Implementation, training and consulting work sold alongside the software, a shrinking share of the total.

Perpetual licenses2%

One-time software license sales, a legacy model Bentley has largely phased out in favor of subscriptions.

Vantagem competitiva

Custos de mudança · Estreita

An infrastructure project's design files, models and years of asset data live inside Bentley's software, and engineering teams are trained on its specific tools; moving a large, ongoing infrastructure program to a rival platform means retraining staff and migrating irreplaceable project history. The advantage is real but not absolute, since Autodesk and other established players compete directly for the same infrastructure-engineering budgets.

O que impulsiona a procura

Moderadamente cíclico

A large share of Bentley's customers are governments and regulated utilities funding long-lived infrastructure programs, spending that is planned years ahead and less sensitive to a single bad quarter than typical corporate IT budgets. The remaining private-sector engineering and construction demand is more cyclical, rising and falling with construction activity and interest rates that affect project financing.

Principais riscos

  • Competition from larger rivals — Bentley competes against Autodesk and other large, well-resourced software companies in several of its core markets, including public-works and facilities design, which can pressure pricing and win rates.
  • Currency exposure from global operations — A significant share of revenue and costs is denominated in currencies other than the US dollar, so exchange-rate movements can affect reported results even when underlying demand is unchanged.
  • Dependence on continued subscription renewals — With subscriptions now the large majority of revenue, results depend on customers renewing rather than switching platforms or delaying software spending during a construction-sector downturn.

Concentração de clientes

Bentley does not disclose concentration among individual customers; its revenue is spread across a large number of engineering firms, government agencies and utilities worldwide, with no single buyer material to overall results.

Os argumentos a favor

Buyers argue that infrastructure spending by governments and utilities is a multi-decade need largely insulated from short-term economic swings, that the shift to subscriptions has made revenue more predictable and recurring, and that deeply embedded design software is hard to displace once an engineering team's projects and history live inside it.

Os argumentos contra

Sellers worry that Autodesk and other well-capitalized competitors can keep chipping away at Bentley's core infrastructure-design markets, that a slowdown in construction activity or public infrastructure budgets would eventually show up in subscription growth, and that currency swings across Bentley's many international markets add volatility to reported results.

Written by the editors, published on 18 de agosto de 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on 18 de setembro de 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

P/E: 27.1Score: 76Market cap: $44.17B

Autodesk is the competitor Bentley names most often in its own 10-K, selling design and BIM software to the same engineering firms and owner-operators for public works, utilities, buildings and project delivery.

P/E: 32.8Score: 60Market cap: $13.45B

Trimble sells design, survey and construction-management software to the same civil-infrastructure and building customers Bentley targets in its Public Works/Utilities and Commercial/Facilities segments.

Hexagon ABNot tracked

Hexagon competes with Bentley across reality capture, geospatial and plant-design software sold to infrastructure, industrial and mining operators.

AVEVA Group Limited (unit of Schneider Electric SE)Not tracked

AVEVA is Bentley's main rival in plant-design and asset-performance software for process plants, refineries and utilities.

Nemetschek SENot tracked

Nemetschek's design and BIM brands compete for the same architecture, structural and facilities customers Bentley serves in its Commercial/Facilities business.

Dassault Systèmes SENot tracked

Dassault Systèmes competes for industrial and resources engineering customers with its 3D design and lifecycle-management platform.

Balanço & Liquidez

Receita

$1.60B

Últimos 12 meses (até 30/06/2026)

Resultado Líquido

$290M

Últimos 12 meses (até 30/06/2026)

Fluxo de Caixa Livre

$520M

Capital Próprio Total

$1.19B

Passivo Total

$2.37B

Rácio de Liquidez

0.59

Cobertura de Juros

19.70

Dívida/EBITDA

2.71

Resultados Por Ação

Receita & Resultado Líquido

Fluxo de Caixa Livre

Decomposição dos Resultados

Demonstração histórica

Margens ao longo do tempo

A dívida ao longo do tempo

Quanto pesa a dívida

Grelha do crescimento

Crescimento — Receitas

Estimativa de Valor Justo

Caso geralJustamente Valorizada

Valor Justo

$30.26

Preço Atual

$31.95

Margem de Segurança

-5.6%

Intervalo de Valor Justo

$19.67 - $40.85

Dispersão entre os métodos de avaliação utilizados, não um intervalo de confiança calibrado estatisticamente.

Métodos de Estimativa

Preço-alvo dos analistas:$44.00
Fluxo de caixa descontado (DCF):Dados insuficientes para o calcular
Multiplicador de lucros (P/E):$19.12
Fórmula de crescimento de Graham:$29.81
Valor da capacidade de gerar lucro (EPV):$9.18
P/B justificado:$12.75
Desconto de dividendos (Gordon):$4.72
P/FFO, fundos de operações:Dados insuficientes para o calcular
Lucros de meio de ciclo:Dados insuficientes para o calcular
Multiplicador sobre as receitas:$25.64
Consenso dos Analistas:Compra Forte (16B / 5H / 0S)
Última Surpresa de Resultados:+9.65%

Métricas de Avaliação

Rácio P/E

35.50

ROE

23.4%

Rácio P/B

7.72

P/FCF

18.62

Margem Bruta

81.8%

ROIC

11.5%

Radar de Rentabilidade

Criação de Valor (Vantagem Competitiva)

ROIC

11.5%

WACC

9.1%

ROIC − WACC

+2.4 pp

O ROIC supera o custo do capital — a empresa está a criar valor para os acionistas.

Critérios de Análise Fundamental

Aprovado (20)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 8.19%
  • ROIC 11.5%
  • Gross Margin 81.8%
  • P/FCF 18.62
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 23.6%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • ROE 24.1%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 13.4%
  • Analyst Consensus 76% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 3.9%
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.80
  • Share Dilution 0.2%
  • Net Margin Trend 18.1% vs 17.9%
  • Piotroski F-Score 9/9

Reprovado (7)

  • Price CAGR -3.50%
  • P/B Ratio 7.72
  • Current Ratio
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Unknown)
  • PEG Ratio 2.28

Indisponível (1)

  • Dividend Payout NaN%

Piotroski F-Score

9/9

Saúde financeira sólida

score
criteria

Qualidade dos Resultados

1.80

Alta qualidade: resultados respaldados por caixa

Diluição de Ações

0.2%

Número de ações estável

Participações institucionais

Governação

Equipa Executiva

NomeCargoIdade
Mr. Gregory S. BentleyPresident & Executive Chairman of the Board69
Mr. Nicholas H. CuminsCEO & Director48
Mr. Keith Arthur BentleyFounder, Technology Advisor, Executive VP & Director66
Mr. Barry Joe Bentley Ph.D.Co-Founder & Director59
Mr. Werner Andre CPAChief Financial Officer54
Mr. James LeeChief Operating Officer45
Mr. David R. Shaman J.D.Chief Legal Officer & Secretary59
Mr. Thomas F. TrimbackChief Accounting Officer & Global Controller-
Mr. Julien MoutteChief Technology Officer46
Ms. Ruth SleeterChief Information Officer-

Risco de Auditoria

2

Risco do Conselho

10

Risco de Remuneração

7

Risco dos Direitos dos Acionistas

10

Parte 2 · O preço e o momento de entrar

Esta parte não serve para saber se a empresa vale: serve para escolher quando comprá-la, depois que os fundamentos te convenceram. Dentro: análise técnica, potencial, quedas históricas, exposição gama.

Documentos

  • Relatório anual (10-K)

    Uma visão anual do negócio, dos resultados financeiros e dos riscos da empresa.

    Arquivado em 2026-02-26

    Ver documento
  • Relatório trimestral (10-Q)

    Uma atualização sobre o desempenho financeiro dos últimos três meses.

    Arquivado em 2026-08-06

    Ver documento
  • Relatório de fato relevante (8-K)

    Um aviso sobre um fato relevante, como uma mudança na liderança ou um grande anúncio.

    Arquivado em 2026-09-11

    Ver documento

via SEC EDGAR

Histórico de Resultados

via SEC EDGAR

Latest News

Recent headlines for BSY, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for BSY.