Back to rankings

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH)

Undervalued
TechnologyInformation Technology ServicesUnited States

Fundamental

76

Price

$64.19

Market Cap

$27.04B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Cognizant provides IT services and consulting to large corporations, mainly through outsourced staff who design, build and run its clients' software and technology operations. Engagements span digital engineering, cloud migration, data and AI, and maintenance of existing applications. Cognizant does not build software products for resale: it sells the time and expertise of its consultants and delivery teams, most of them based in India, to companies that find it cheaper to use Cognizant's staff than to hire and manage the equivalent headcount themselves.

How it makes money

Revenue comes almost entirely from time-and-materials or fixed-price service contracts, billed as consultants do the work, rather than from software licenses. Because the business is labor-intensive, margins depend on staff utilization, wage inflation, and the mix between higher-margin advisory work and lower-margin staff augmentation. Long, multi-year outsourcing contracts make revenue relatively sticky quarter to quarter, but pricing is renegotiated regularly and clients can shift volume to competitors offering comparable skills at a lower cost.

Revenue by segment

Health Sciences30.1%

Consulting and technology services for healthcare payers, providers, life sciences and pharmaceutical companies, the largest and fastest-growing segment.

Financial Services29.2%

Technology and consulting services for banks, insurers and capital markets firms, covering core-system modernization, risk and compliance.

Products and Resources25%

Services for manufacturing, retail, logistics, travel, energy and utility companies, boosted in 2025 by the Belcan engineering acquisition.

Communications, Media and Technology15.7%

Services for telecom operators, media companies and technology firms, the smallest of the four reporting segments.

Competitive moat

Switching costs · Narrow

Cognizant embeds its consultants inside client IT operations for years at a time, and moving a large outsourced function to a new vendor means re-training staff and re-documenting systems, which clients avoid unless service quality slips badly. But the underlying skills are not scarce: Accenture, TCS, Infosys and Wipro can staff similar teams, so the advantage rarely survives a serious price challenge.

What drives demand

Moderately cyclical

Demand tracks corporate technology budgets, which grow with digital transformation spending but get trimmed quickly when clients face their own cost pressure. Cognizant has repeatedly seen client decision cycles lengthen and discretionary projects pause during uncertain macro periods, even though multi-year outsourcing contracts provide a floor of recurring, less discretionary revenue.

Key risks

  • Wage inflation and talent competition — Cognizant competes for skilled technology talent, mainly in India, and rising wages or attrition among delivery staff pressure margins and can disrupt client engagements if experienced consultants leave mid-project.
  • Client concentration and contract renewal risk — A meaningful share of revenue comes from a relatively small number of long-standing clients, and losing or renegotiating even one major account at lower rates has a visible effect on results.
  • Immigration and visa policy exposure — Much of Cognizant's US-based delivery model depends on visas for foreign workers; tighter immigration rules or higher visa costs raise expenses and constrain how the company staffs client projects.
  • Pricing pressure and automation — Clients increasingly push for lower hourly rates and outcome-based pricing, while AI-assisted coding tools threaten to shrink the billable staff-hours a given project requires.
  • Currency mismatch between costs and revenue — Costs are incurred largely in Indian rupees while revenue is billed mostly in dollars and other client currencies, so exchange-rate swings between the two can compress reported margins.

The case for

Buyers argue that AI-driven modernization work is expanding the addressable market for a proven delivery organization, that acquisitions like Belcan diversify revenue into engineering services, and that renewed double-digit growth in Health Sciences and Financial Services shows demand has stabilized after several slow years.

The case against

Sellers fear that generative AI coding tools will erode the staff-augmentation model that still accounts for much of billings, that competition from Indian and global peers keeps pricing under permanent pressure, and that revenue growth stays dependent on discretionary client spending that can pause quickly.

Segment figures from fiscal year 2025Sources: Cognizant Reports Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2025 Results

Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on September 18, 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

P/E: 19.5Score: 58Market cap: $207.90B

Its consulting arm bids for the same large application modernization, cloud migration and managed services engagements with North American corporate clients.

Accenture plcACN

The largest global IT consulting and systems integration firm, bidding against Cognizant for the same large digital transformation, cloud and application outsourcing contracts with North American and European enterprises.

Infosys LimitedINFY

Indian-headquartered provider with the same offshore delivery model, competing for the same banking, insurance and healthcare clients in the United States that generate most of Cognizant's revenue.

Tata Consultancy Services LimitedTCS

India's largest IT services company, competing directly for the multi-year application maintenance and business process outsourcing contracts of the same global banks, insurers and retailers.

Wipro LimitedWIPRO

Another India-based offshore services provider selling application development, infrastructure management and engineering services to the same enterprise buyers, largely in North America and Europe.

Capgemini SECAP

European consulting and systems integration group that competes with Cognizant for the same enterprise technology budgets, particularly in continental Europe and the United Kingdom.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$21.41B

Trailing 12 months (through 3/31/2026)

Net Income

$2.23B

Trailing 12 months (through 3/31/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$2.60B

Total Equity

$15.02B

Total Liabilities

$5.68B

Current Ratio

2.23

Interest Coverage

105.59

Debt/EBITDA

0.28

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

General caseUndervalued

Fair Value

$86.10

Current Price

$64.19

Margin of Safety

+25.4%

Fair Value Range

$55.96 - $116.23

Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.

Estimation Methods

Analyst price target:$64.38
Discounted cash flow (DCF):$158.48
Earnings multiple (P/E):$43.84
Graham growth formula:$132.90
Earnings power value (EPV):$62.88
Justified P/B:$65.12
Dividend discount (Gordon):$24.74
P/FFO, funds from operations:$93.87
Mid-cycle earnings:$190.77
Revenue multiple:$237.05
Analyst Consensus:Buy (18B / 19H / 0S)
Last Earnings Surprise:-2.41%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

12.46

ROE

14.9%

P/B Ratio

1.81

P/FCF

11.02

Gross Margin

-

ROIC

15.7%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

15.7%

WACC

9.0%

ROIC − WACC

+6.7 pp

ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (18)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 7.95%
  • ROIC 15.7%
  • P/FCF 11.02
  • P/B Ratio 1.81
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 15.8%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • Current Ratio
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • ROE 14.9%
  • PEG Ratio 0.96
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.24
  • Share Dilution -1.5%
  • Piotroski F-Score 7/9

Failed (8)

  • Price CAGR 0.54%
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Fairly valued)
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 4.9%
  • Analyst Consensus 49% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 1.4%
  • Net Margin Trend 10.4% vs 11.7%

Unavailable (2)

  • Gross Margin NaN%
  • Dividend Payout NaN%

Piotroski F-Score

7/9

Strong financial health

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

1.24

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

-1.5%

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Institutional Holdings

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Ravi Kumar SingisettiCEO & Director54
Mr. Jatin Pravinchandra Dalal C.F.A.Chief Financial Officer50
Mr. John Sunshin KimChief Legal Officer, Chief Administrative Officer & Corporate Secretary57
Mr. Balu Ganesh AyyarPresident of Asia Pacific & Japan and Industry Solutions Group63
Mr. Surya GummadiPresident of Americas48
Mr. Rajesh VarrierPresident of Operations & CMD of Cognizant India55
Ms. Alina KerdmanSVP, Controller & Chief Accounting Officer43
Mr. Tyler J. ScottGlobal Head of Investor Relations-
Ms. Thea HaydenChief Marketing Officer-
Ms. Kathryn DiazChief People Officer55

Audit Risk

1

Board Risk

4

Compensation Risk

4

Shareholder Rights Risk

2

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Documents

  • Annual Report (10-K)

    A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.

    Filed on 2026-02-12

    View document
  • Quarterly Report (10-Q)

    A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.

    Filed on 2026-07-29

    View document
  • Current Report (8-K)

    An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.

    Filed on 2026-07-29

    View document

via SEC EDGAR

Income History

via SEC EDGAR

Latest News

Recent headlines for CTSH, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 6/1/2026NEUTRAL
    Cognizant CEO is swimming against the tide on AI: he’s hiring over 20,000 graduates this year and says AI tokenmaxxing is a ‘vanity metric’

    Cognizant CEO Ravi Kumar S. is bucking the trend of AI-driven job cuts, announcing plans to hire over 20,000 graduates this year. He also criticized the focus on 'AI tokenmaxxing' as a 'vanity metric,' suggesting that companies prioritizing this are misinterpreting AI's true value. This stance implies a belief in the continued importance of human capital alongside AI integration, potentially signaling a long-term growth strategy focused on talent development rather than immediate cost-cutting through automation. Investors may view this as a sign of confidence in future demand for services and the company's ability to scale.

  • 5/6/2026NEGATIVE
    Linkfest: 06 May, 2026

    Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation is reportedly planning to lay off between 12,000 and 15,000 employees, representing a significant portion of its workforce. This move signals potential headwinds for the IT services sector, possibly due to slowing client demand or restructuring efforts. For investors, this indicates a period of uncertainty and potential pressure on Cognizant's future revenue growth and profitability. The scale of the layoffs suggests a proactive, albeit drastic, measure to cut costs and align operations with market conditions.

  • 3/19/2026NEGATIVE
    Fortune 500 firm updates AI price tag to $4.5 trillion, estimating 93% of jobs vulnerable to disruption

    Cognizant has revised its earlier 2023 estimates on AI-driven job displacement, now projecting that approximately 93% of jobs could be vulnerable to disruption. This updated assessment, doubling previous projections, suggests a more profound and rapid impact of artificial intelligence on the workforce than initially anticipated. For investors, this signals potential headwinds for companies reliant on large human workforces and may necessitate strategic shifts towards automation and reskilling initiatives to mitigate future risks.

via Markets Gazette