Zurück zu den Rankings

Boyaa Interactive International Limited (BOYAF)

Fair bewertet
Communication ServicesElectronic Gaming & MultimediaHong Kong

Fundamental

57

Kurs

$3.10

Marktkapitalisierung

$2.33B

Teil 1 · Was das Unternehmen wert ist

Übersicht

Boyaa Interactive develops and operates mobile and PC card and board games — mainly Texas Hold'em poker, mahjong and other Chinese card games — sold mostly to Chinese-speaking players in Hong Kong, Macau and the wider region. Since 2024 the company has redirected much of its cash into a Bitcoin treasury strategy, buying and holding cryptocurrency on its balance sheet rather than reinvesting it in games, which now sizes its digital-asset holdings far larger than its game business.

Wie das Geld verdient wird

Game revenue comes from in-app purchases players make for virtual items and enhanced play inside otherwise free-to-download card and board games — a business earning steady but shrinking fees from a mature player base. Alongside it, the company reports a separate Web3-related segment tied to its cryptocurrency holdings; this contributes little operating revenue but drives most of the swings in reported profit, because gains and losses on Bitcoin's market price flow straight through the income statement.

Umsatz nach Segment

Online game related business94.7%

In-app purchases from mobile and PC card and board games such as Texas Hold'em, Mahjong Collection and Fight the Landlord, played mostly by Chinese-speaking users; revenue fell 6.6% in 2025.

Web3 related business5.3%

Activity tied to the company's cryptocurrency holdings; a small revenue line next to a roughly HK$2.92 billion Bitcoin treasury whose price swings drive most of reported profit.

Wettbewerbsvorteil

Kein erkennbarer Vorteil · Keiner

Boyaa competes in a mobile card-game market dominated by far larger Chinese platforms such as Tencent and NetEase, and its own game revenue has been declining for years. Its games are not tied to unique intellectual property or network effects strong enough to lock in players, so the company has instead built its balance sheet around a large speculative Bitcoin holding rather than around a durable competitive position.

Was die Nachfrage antreibt

Zyklisch

Game revenue depends on a mature, shrinking base of Chinese-speaking card-game players and has fallen for multiple years running. Reported profit now depends far more on Bitcoin's price than on game sales: a rising crypto market produced large paper gains in 2024, while a falling one drove a HK$2.39 billion loss in 2025 and a further loss warning in early 2026.

Wichtigste Risiken

  • Bitcoin price exposure — The company holds roughly 4,092 Bitcoin as a treasury asset and marks it to market; falling Bitcoin prices produced a HK$2.39 billion attributable loss in 2025 and the company has flagged a further, larger loss for the first quarter of 2026 on continued price declines.
  • Declining core game revenue — Revenue from the online game business, the company's original and largest activity, fell 6.6% in 2025 to HK$442.8 million, continuing a multi-year decline in its card and board game portfolio.
  • Capital concentrated in one speculative asset — At the end of 2025 the company's digital assets were valued at approximately HK$2.92 billion, several times its annual revenue, so the balance sheet's value depends overwhelmingly on the price of one volatile cryptocurrency.

Die Argumente dafür

Buyers argue that Boyaa's Bitcoin treasury, now worth several times its annual game revenue, gives shareholders leveraged exposure to a rising cryptocurrency market while the legacy card-game business still generates a stable stream of in-app purchase revenue and dividends.

Die Argumente dagegen

Sellers worry that a shrinking core game business is now overshadowed by a highly volatile Bitcoin holding that produced a HK$2.39 billion loss in 2025 alone, turning what was a game company into a leveraged crypto bet that can swing sharply with digital-asset prices.

Written by the editors, published on 18. August 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Generated on 18. September 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

Zengame Technology Holding Limited (禅游科技控股有限公司)2660.HK

Zengame builds the same Chinese card and board titles as Boyaa — Fight the Landlord and regional mahjong on mobile — and monetises the same free-to-play players through in-app purchases.

Ourgame International Holdings Limited (联众国际控股有限公司)6899.HK

Ourgame runs the Lianzhong online card and board platform plus poker tournaments, going after the same Chinese-language players on PC and mobile that Boyaa serves.

Tencent Holdings Limited (腾讯控股有限公司)0700.HK

Tencent's QQ Games card and board section — Happy Landlord, mahjong, Texas Hold'em — is the dominant free offering in China and takes directly from Boyaa's home-market audience.

Zynga Inc. (a Take-Two Interactive company)Not tracked

Zynga Poker is the best-known free-to-play Texas Hold'em game worldwide and competes head-on with Boyaa Texas Poker for international casual poker players.

Playtika Holding Corp.PLTK

Playtika operates the official World Series of Poker play-for-fun app, competing for the same social-poker payers outside China that Boyaa targets with its localised versions.

Bilanz & Liquidität

Umsatz

$497M

Letzte 12 Monate bis zum zuletzt gemeldeten Quartal — Schätzung aus Kennzahlen je Aktie

Nettogewinn

$-1.22B

Letzte 12 Monate bis zum zuletzt gemeldeten Quartal — Schätzung aus Kennzahlen je Aktie

Freier Cashflow

$236M

Gesamtes Eigenkapital

$2.05B

Gesamtverbindlichkeiten

$10M

Current Ratio

5.70

Zinsdeckungsgrad

-

Schulden/EBITDA

-

Gewinn je Aktie

Umsatz & Nettogewinn

Freier Cashflow

Ertragsaufschlüsselung

Historische Aufstellung

Margen im Zeitverlauf

Verschuldung im Zeitverlauf

Wie schwer die Schulden wiegen

Wachstumsraster

Wachstum — Umsatz

Innerer-Wert-Schätzung

Allgemeiner FallFair bewertet

Innerer Wert

$3.38

Aktueller Kurs

$3.10

Sicherheitsmarge

+8.2%

Innerer-Wert-Spanne

$3.21 - $3.55

Streubreite zwischen den verwendeten Bewertungsmethoden, kein statistisch kalibriertes Konfidenzintervall.

Bewertungsmethoden

Kursziel der Analysten:Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
Diskontierter Cashflow (DCF):$3.38
Gewinnmultiplikator (P/E):Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
Graham-Wachstumsformel:Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
Ertragskraftwert (EPV):Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
Gerechtfertigtes P/B:Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
Dividendendiskontierung (Gordon):$0.64
P/FFO, Funds from Operations:Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
Gewinn im Zyklusmittel:Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
Umsatzmultiplikator:$1.41
Analystenkonsens:Starker Kauf (4B / 1H / 0S)
Letzte Gewinnüberraschung:-20.46%

Bewertungskennzahlen

P/E-Verhältnis

-

ROE

-49.9%

P/B-Verhältnis

1.15

P/FCF

9.85

Bruttomarge

72.0%

ROIC

-44.4%

Rentabilitäts-Radar

Wertschöpfung (Wettbewerbsvorteil)

ROIC

-44.4%

WACC

15.4%

ROIC − WACC

-59.8 pp

Der ROIC liegt unter den Kapitalkosten: Das Unternehmen vernichtet für jeden investierten Dollar Wert.

Fundamentalanalyse-Kriterien

Bestanden (9)

  • Gross Margin 72.0%
  • P/FCF 9.85
  • P/B Ratio 1.15
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • DCF valuation (Undervalued)
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 5.9%
  • Analyst Consensus 80% Buy

Nicht bestanden (7)

  • Price CAGR -1.60%
  • ROIC -44.4%
  • Operating Margin -284.1%
  • CapEx intensity
  • ROE -43.6%
  • Earnings Surprise avg -10.6%
  • Piotroski F-Score 2/9

Nicht verfügbar (11)

  • EPS data insufficient
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/Net Income)
  • Share Dilution (missing shares data)
  • Net Margin Trend (invalid data)

Piotroski F-Score

2/9

Ernsthafte finanzielle Bedenken

score
criteria

Gewinnqualität

-

Niedrige Qualität: Rechnungslegung prüfen

Aktienverwässerung

-

Aktienrückkäufe. Aktionärsfreundlich

Institutionelle Beteiligungen

Für dieses Unternehmen liegen keine institutionellen Meldungen vor.

Unternehmensführung

Führungsteam

NamePositionAlter
Mr. Zhikang DaiExecutive Chairman43
Ms. Chunyan YinExecutive Director33
Mr. Ping Yeung PoonJoint Company Secretary-

Teil 2 · Der Preis und der Einstiegszeitpunkt

Dieser Teil sagt nicht, ob das Unternehmen etwas taugt: Er hilft bei der Wahl des Kaufzeitpunkts, nachdem die Fundamentaldaten überzeugt haben. Enthalten: technische Analyse, Potenzial, historische Drawdowns, Gamma-Exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for BOYAF, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for BOYAF.