Zurück zu den Rankings

Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (CHKP)

Fair bewertet
TechnologySoftware - InfrastructureIsrael

Fundamental

66

Kurs

$130.80

Marktkapitalisierung

$13.92B

Teil 1 · Was das Unternehmen wert ist

Übersicht

Check Point sells the firewalls and related security software that sit at the edge of a company's network, inspecting traffic entering and leaving to block intrusions, malware and data theft. It was one of the pioneers of the corporate firewall in the 1990s and still sells physical security appliances, but has been extending its portfolio into cloud security, endpoint protection and email security to compete with newer, cloud-native rivals.

Wie das Geld verdient wird

Revenue splits between selling hardware and perpetual software licences, ongoing security subscriptions that give customers access to updated threat protection, and software updates and maintenance contracts tied to the installed base. Subscriptions are the fastest-growing and most recurring part of the business, while hardware and one-time licence sales are lumpier and depend on new equipment refresh cycles.

Umsatz nach Segment

Security Subscriptions44.7%

Recurring subscriptions giving customers access to updated threat prevention across network, cloud, endpoint and email products.

Software Updates and Maintenance35.2%

Support contracts and software updates tied to the large base of security appliances and software already installed at customers.

Products and Licences20.1%

Security appliances and one-time software licences sold to new customers or as equipment refreshes for existing ones.

Wettbewerbsvorteil

Wechselkosten · Schmal

Once Check Point's firewalls and security policies are configured deep inside a company's network, replacing them means re-architecting security operations, which customers put off unless something forces the change. That stickiness is weakening rather than strengthening: Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet and CrowdStrike have been taking share in newer categories like cloud and endpoint security, so the advantage today looks narrow.

Was die Nachfrage antreibt

Mäßig zyklisch

Cybersecurity spending is treated by most enterprises as close to non-discretionary, since a breach can be far costlier than the security budget itself, which cushions demand relative to general IT spending. Even so, the pace of new deals and equipment refreshes still tracks overall enterprise IT budgets and can slow when companies broadly tighten spending.

Wichtigste Risiken

  • Losing share to newer security vendors — Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet, CrowdStrike and Microsoft are all competing aggressively in cloud and endpoint security, categories where Check Point's legacy firewall position gives it less of an edge.
  • Transition toward subscription-based security — Growing security subscriptions faster than legacy hardware and licence revenue declines is an ongoing execution challenge, and a slower transition would weigh on overall growth.
  • Israel-based operations and geopolitical risk — A significant part of Check Point's research and development and management is based in Israel, exposing the company to regional political and military conditions that could disrupt operations.
  • Being targeted as a security vendor — As a maker of security products, Check Point is itself an attractive target for attackers; a breach of its own systems or a flaw discovered in its products would damage trust in a business built on protecting others.
  • Dependence on channel partners — Much of Check Point's sales go through resellers and distributors rather than a direct sales force, so its results depend on those partners continuing to prioritise its products over competitors'.

Die Argumente dafür

Buyers argue that Check Point's security subscription revenue keeps growing at double-digit rates even as overall revenue growth is modest, that its large installed base of maintenance and support contracts provides a stable, high-margin recurring foundation, and that improving net margins show discipline as the mix shifts toward subscriptions.

Die Argumente dagegen

Sellers worry that Check Point's core firewall franchise keeps losing relative ground to faster-growing rivals in cloud and endpoint security, that overall revenue growth well below the broader cybersecurity market suggests share loss rather than category strength, and that Israel-based operations add a geopolitical risk most competitors do not carry.

Written by the editors, published on 18. August 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on 18. September 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

P/E: 993.3Score: 57Market cap: $318.95B

Named by Check Point in its 20-F, Palo Alto Networks sells next-generation firewalls and a consolidated network, cloud and SASE security platform to the same large-enterprise security budgets.

P/E: 63.2Score: 75Market cap: $131.09B

Also named in Check Point's 20-F, Fortinet competes head-on in enterprise firewall appliances and integrated security platforms, and is especially aggressive in the mid-market where Check Point's Quantum gateways sell.

P/E: 32.3Score: 71Market cap: $421.74B

Cisco is listed among Check Point's competitors in the 20-F and sells firewalls and a broad security suite to the same corporate network buyers, often bundled with the networking hardware those customers already own.

P/E: —Score: 46Market cap: $35.00B

Zscaler competes for the cloud-delivered security spend that Check Point targets with Harmony SASE and its secure web gateway and zero-trust access offerings.

Sophos Group plcNot tracked

Sophos, private since the Thoma Bravo buyout, sells firewalls and endpoint protection to the small and mid-sized businesses that also buy Check Point's Quantum Spark and Harmony Endpoint lines.

Bilanz & Liquidität

Umsatz

$2.76B

Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)

Nettogewinn

$1.05B

Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)

Freier Cashflow

$701M

Gesamtes Eigenkapital

$2.72B

Gesamtverbindlichkeiten

$1.97B

Current Ratio

1.67

Zinsdeckungsgrad

-

Schulden/EBITDA

2.33

Gewinn je Aktie

Umsatz & Nettogewinn

Freier Cashflow

Ertragsaufschlüsselung

Historische Aufstellung

Margen im Zeitverlauf

Verschuldung im Zeitverlauf

Wie schwer die Schulden wiegen

Wachstumsraster

Wachstum — Umsatz

Innerer-Wert-Schätzung

Allgemeiner FallFair bewertet

Innerer Wert

$154.98

Aktueller Kurs

$130.80

Sicherheitsmarge

+15.6%

Innerer-Wert-Spanne

$110.83 - $199.14

Streubreite zwischen den verwendeten Bewertungsmethoden, kein statistisch kalibriertes Konfidenzintervall.

Bewertungsmethoden

Kursziel der Analysten:$145.83
Diskontierter Cashflow (DCF):$197.21
Gewinnmultiplikator (P/E):$121.10
Graham-Wachstumsformel:$245.04
Ertragskraftwert (EPV):$76.54
Gerechtfertigtes P/B:$168.38
Dividendendiskontierung (Gordon):Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
P/FFO, Funds from Operations:Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
Gewinn im Zyklusmittel:Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
Umsatzmultiplikator:$136.33
Analystenkonsens:Kaufen (20B / 25H / 0S)
Letzte Gewinnüberraschung:+2.18%

Bewertungskennzahlen

P/E-Verhältnis

13.98

ROE

37.6%

P/B-Verhältnis

5.12

P/FCF

19.86

Bruttomarge

87.5%

ROIC

12.8%

Rentabilitäts-Radar

Wertschöpfung (Wettbewerbsvorteil)

ROIC

12.8%

WACC

7.0%

ROIC − WACC

+5.8 pp

Der ROIC übersteigt die Kapitalkosten: Das Unternehmen schafft Wert für die Aktionäre.

Fundamentalanalyse-Kriterien

Bestanden (14)

  • Price CAGR 5.27%
  • ROIC 12.8%
  • Gross Margin 87.5%
  • P/FCF 19.86
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • ROE 36.4%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 5.7%
  • Earnings Surprise avg 20.6%
  • PEG Ratio 1.34
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.07
  • Net Margin Trend 38.8% vs 33.0%

Nicht bestanden (5)

  • P/B Ratio 5.12
  • CapEx intensity
  • DCF valuation (Fairly valued)
  • Analyst Consensus 44% Buy
  • Piotroski F-Score 2/9

Nicht verfügbar (8)

  • EPS data insufficient
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Operating Margin NaN%
  • Interest Coverage
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • Share Dilution (missing shares data)

Piotroski F-Score

2/9

Ernsthafte finanzielle Bedenken

score
criteria

Gewinnqualität

1.07

Hohe Qualität: Gewinne durch Cashflow gedeckt

Aktienverwässerung

-

Aktienrückkäufe. Aktionärsfreundlich

Institutionelle Beteiligungen

Für dieses Unternehmen liegen keine institutionellen Meldungen vor.

Unternehmensführung

Führungsteam

NamePositionAlter
Brig.Gen. Nadav ZafrirCEO & Director54
Ms. Nataly KremerChief Product Officer and Head of R&D-
Mr. Roi KaroChief Strategy Officer-
Mr. Gil FriedrichlGeneral Manager of Workspace Security-
Mr. Gil ShwedFounder & Executive Chairman56
Mr. Roei GolanChief Financial Officer-
Mr. Jonathan ZangerChief Technology Officer-
Mr. Ariel PisetzkyChief Information Officer-
Mr. Kip E. MeintzerHead of Global Investor Relations-
Shira YasharGeneral Counsel-

Teil 2 · Der Preis und der Einstiegszeitpunkt

Dieser Teil sagt nicht, ob das Unternehmen etwas taugt: Er hilft bei der Wahl des Kaufzeitpunkts, nachdem die Fundamentaldaten überzeugt haben. Enthalten: technische Analyse, Potenzial, historische Drawdowns, Gamma-Exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for CHKP, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 2/27/2026NEGATIVE
    Sphera Dumps 15,000 Check Point Software Shares Worth $3.1 Million

    Sphera, a prominent investment fund, recently divested 15,000 shares of Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., totaling $3.1 million. This move, which sees a significant entity reduce its exposure to the cybersecurity giant, could be interpreted by investors as a cautionary signal. While Sphera's exact motivations remain undisclosed, the sale of such a substantial stake might suggest a revised outlook on the company's future prospects or a strategic capital reallocation. Market participants will closely monitor Check Point Software, a leader in integrated protection across networks, cloud, and endpoints, to ascertain if this divestment foreshadows a shift in overall sentiment.

via Markets Gazette