Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM)
UnterbewertetFundamental
74
Kurs
$57.73
Marktkapitalisierung
$2.94B
Teil 1 · Was das Unternehmen wert ist
Übersicht
Columbia Sportswear designs, sources and sells outdoor and active lifestyle apparel, footwear, accessories and equipment under four owned brands: Columbia (founded 1938, high-value outdoor apparel and footwear for hiking, trail running, snow sports and fishing), SOREL (lifestyle footwear), Mountain Hardwear (premium technical gear for climbers, mountaineers and skiers) and prAna (versatile apparel and accessories). The company owns no factories: all products are made by independent contract manufacturers, mostly in Asia. It sells worldwide through wholesale partners and through its own direct-to-consumer network, which at December 31, 2025 included over 170 stores in the U.S., over 305 in Latin America and Asia Pacific, over 70 in Europe-direct markets and over 15 in Canada, plus branded e-commerce sites.
Wie das Geld verdient wird
Revenue comes from selling physical goods, through two channels. Wholesale means selling at a discount to specialty retailers, sporting goods chains, department stores and internet retailers, on orders placed months before the selling season; direct-to-consumer means selling at full retail price in Columbia's own full-price and outlet stores and on its own websites, which keeps the retailer's margin in-house. In fiscal 2025 wholesale generated $1,780.6 million of net sales and direct-to-consumer $1,616.8 million, out of $3,397.4 million in total — the two channels are now close to an even split. By product, apparel, accessories and equipment accounted for $2,712.4 million and footwear for $685.0 million. A small amount of licensing income is also reported. Sales are strongly seasonal: the filing states they are weighted substantially toward the third and fourth quarters, when cold-weather product ships, while costs are spread evenly across the year.
Umsatz nach Segment
The domestic market: wholesale shipments to U.S. retailers plus Columbia's own U.S. stores, outlets and e-commerce. Net sales were $1,979.0 million in fiscal 2025, down from $2,068.2 million in 2024.
Latin America and Asia Pacific, including China, Japan and Korea, served through owned stores, e-commerce, wholesale partners and independent distributors. Net sales were $611.1 million in fiscal 2025, up from $560.7 million.
Europe, the Middle East and Africa, part sold directly in Europe-direct markets and part through independent distributors. Net sales were $576.9 million in fiscal 2025, up from $511.8 million.
The Canadian market, sold mainly to wholesale customers and through a small owned store network. Net sales were $230.2 million in fiscal 2025, roughly flat on $227.9 million.
Wettbewerbsvorteil
Marke · SchmalColumbia's advantage is its brand and its proprietary product technologies, built over more than eighty years and supported by a large owned store and e-commerce network that lets it sell at full price. That is a real but limited edge: the filing itself describes competition from large rivals with heavy marketing budgets, from emerging brands built on direct-to-consumer digital selling, and from the private labels of the very retailers that carry its products. Nothing stops a customer from buying a jacket from another brand next season, and about half the business still depends on wholesale partners who choose each year how much to order.
Was die Nachfrage antreibt
ZyklischOutdoor apparel and footwear are discretionary purchases: when households tighten spending, a new jacket is easy to postpone, and the company names economic volatility and inflation among its own risks. Demand is also weather-driven — a mild winter leaves cold-weather product unsold — and the order book is set months ahead, so a downturn shows up first as cancelled wholesale orders and then as markdowns that compress margins. Sales are concentrated in the third and fourth quarters, which makes a single bad autumn disproportionately costly.
Wichtigste Risiken
- Trade policy and tariffs — The company states that changes in U.S. and global trade policy, and continuing uncertainty over future tariffs and refunds of incremental tariffs already paid, have had and may continue to have an adverse impact on the business — through higher costs, weaker consumer spending, financial stress at wholesale customers, misaligned inventory and heavier promotional pressure.
- Discretionary consumer demand and shifting tastes — Its products are discretionary purchases, so spending is vulnerable to economic volatility and inflation. The company must anticipate consumer preferences and react quickly when they change, in what it describes as a period of heightened economic uncertainty in its key markets.
- Wholesale customer orders can be cancelled — Orders from wholesale customers are placed well ahead of the season and can be cancelled or reduced, which is listed among the company's risk factors alongside the risk of those customers running into financial difficulty.
- Weather — The filing states that sales are affected by weather conditions and that direct-to-consumer sales depend in part on weather, so growth is likely to be hurt — or sales may decline outright — in years when conditions do not stimulate demand. Unseasonably warm weather hits outerwear and cold-weather footwear in particular.
- Dependence on independent contract manufacturers — All manufacturing is outsourced and the company generally does not maintain long-term commitments with its contract manufacturers, only seasonal purchase orders. Supply disruption, quality failures, labour violations at supplier factories and raw material price swings are all disclosed risks; for Spring/Fall 2026 inventory, approximately 27% of footwear and 21% of apparel raw materials for the U.S. market are sourced from China.
- Forecasting inventory a season in advance — Demand has to be forecast well before the selling season. Too much inventory forces markdowns that damage margins and brand equity; too little means lost sales, damaged customer relationships and higher costs to expedite production.
- Competition, including private label — The company competes with large companies that have far greater financial, marketing and operational resources, with emerging brands built on a large direct-to-consumer presence, and with the private-label products of the retailers that also carry its goods.
- Execution of strategic priorities and systems upgrades — The disclosed strategy — demand-creation investment, digital capability, expanding global direct-to-consumer operations and investing in people — requires higher spending that may compress profitability if sales growth or cost savings do not follow. The 10-K also flags risks from upgrading business processes and IT systems, including the distribution network transition and global shared services.
Kundenkonzentration
The filing does not give a consolidated top-customer figure; it discloses concentration segment by segment, and no single customer reaches 10% of group sales. The five largest U.S. wholesale customers accounted for approximately 20% of U.S. net sales, each less than 10% individually; the five largest LAAP wholesale customers about 15% of LAAP net sales; the three largest EMEA wholesale customers about 20% of EMEA net sales, each below 10%; and in Canada the two largest wholesale customers about 30% of Canada net sales, at roughly 17% and 13%. Canada, the smallest segment, is therefore the most concentrated.
Die Argumente dafür
Buyers argue that the brand has survived eighty years of fashion cycles and that the international business is now doing the work: in fiscal 2025 LAAP net sales rose to $611.1 million from $560.7 million and EMEA to $576.9 million from $511.8 million, while the U.S. fell to $1,979.0 million from $2,068.2 million — group sales still ended slightly up at $3,397.4 million. They point to the shift toward direct-to-consumer, now $1,616.8 million against $1,780.6 million of wholesale, as a way to keep the retailer's margin and own the customer relationship, and to a balance sheet unburdened by factories, since all production is outsourced.
Die Argumente dagegen
Sellers fear that the home market keeps shrinking — U.S. net sales have fallen three years running, from $2,241.4 million in 2023 to $2,068.2 million in 2024 and $1,979.0 million in 2025 — and that the U.S. still supplies the majority of group revenue, so international growth is only offsetting decline rather than adding to it. They point to the company's own disclosure that tariff policy has already hurt the business and that a large share of raw materials for U.S.-bound product comes from China, to a merchandise business whose demand can be cancelled by a mild winter, and to competition from better-funded rivals, digital-native brands and the private labels of its own wholesale customers.
Generated on 18. September 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
Generated on 18. September 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users
HOKA, Teva and UGG compete with Columbia's footwear and with SOREL across trail running shoes, sandals and cold-weather lifestyle boots.
Its outdoor brands The North Face and Timberland sell technical jackets, fleece and hiking footwear to the same wholesale accounts and outdoor consumers Columbia serves in North America, Europe and Asia.
Arc'teryx and Salomon compete directly with Columbia and Mountain Hardwear in technical outerwear, ski and hiking gear, and increasingly in the same specialty retail and direct-to-consumer channels.
A privately held US outdoor brand selling insulated jackets, fleece and hiking apparel to the same outdoor customer, competing on brand strength and product performance rather than price.
Merrell and Saucony sell hiking boots and trail shoes at the same price points and through the same outdoor and sporting-goods retailers as Columbia footwear.
Competes for the cold-weather outerwear buyer in Canada, the northern US and Asia, though positioned at a more premium price than Columbia's Omni-Heat range.
Bilanz & Liquidität
Umsatz
$3.41B
Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)
Nettogewinn
$206M
Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)
Freier Cashflow
$217M
Gesamtes Eigenkapital
$1.71B
Gesamtverbindlichkeiten
$1.22B
Current Ratio
2.49
Zinsdeckungsgrad
-
Schulden/EBITDA
1.75
Gewinn je Aktie
Umsatz & Nettogewinn
Freier Cashflow
Ertragsaufschlüsselung
Historische Aufstellung
Margen im Zeitverlauf
Verschuldung im Zeitverlauf
Wie schwer die Schulden wiegen
Wachstumsraster
Wachstum — Umsatz
Innerer-Wert-Schätzung
Innerer Wert
$113.97
Aktueller Kurs
$57.73
Sicherheitsmarge
+49.3%
Innerer-Wert-Spanne
$74.08 - $153.86
Streubreite zwischen den verwendeten Bewertungsmethoden, kein statistisch kalibriertes Konfidenzintervall.
Bewertungsmethoden
Bewertungskennzahlen
P/E-Verhältnis
14.91
ROE
10.4%
P/B-Verhältnis
1.84
P/FCF
9.15
Bruttomarge
52.2%
ROIC
9.9%
Rentabilitäts-Radar
Wertschöpfung (Wettbewerbsvorteil)
ROIC
9.9%
WACC
8.3%
ROIC − WACC
+1.6 pp
Der ROIC übersteigt die Kapitalkosten: Das Unternehmen schafft Wert für die Aktionäre.
Fundamentalanalyse-Kriterien
Bestanden (20)
- EPS shows upward trend
- ROIC 9.9%
- Gross Margin 52.2%
- P/FCF 9.15
- P/B Ratio 1.84
- Debt/Equity ratio
- Operating Margin 7.5%
- Positive Free Cash Flow
- CapEx intensity
- Current Ratio
- Debt/EBITDA
- Return on Tangible Assets
- Low reliance on intangibles
- ROE 12.6%
- Revenue Growth 5Y 6.3%
- Earnings Surprise avg 34.5%
- PEG Ratio 0.95
- Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.86
- Share Dilution -6.4%
- Piotroski F-Score 6/9
Nicht bestanden (6)
- EPS CAGR 3.16%
- Price CAGR -0.26%
- Price below Graham Number
- DCF valuation (Fairly valued)
- Analyst Consensus 47% Buy
- Net Margin Trend 6.0% vs 6.6%
Nicht verfügbar (2)
- Dividend Payout NaN%
- Interest Coverage
Piotroski F-Score
Gemischte Signale: Einige Bereiche bedürfen Aufmerksamkeit
Gewinnqualität
Hohe Qualität: Gewinne durch Cashflow gedeckt
Aktienverwässerung
Aktienrückkäufe. Aktionärsfreundlich
Institutionelle Beteiligungen
Für dieses Unternehmen liegen keine institutionellen Meldungen vor.
Unternehmensführung
Führungsteam
| Name | Position | Alter |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Timothy P. Boyle | CEO & Chairman | 75 |
| Mr. Peter J. Bragdon | President | 62 |
| Mr. Jim A. Swanson | Executive VP & CFO | 50 |
| Ms. Lisa A. Kulok | Executive VP & COO | 59 |
| Mr. Joseph P. Boyle | President of Columbia Brand | 44 |
| Ms. Richelle T. Luther | Executive VP, Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel & Executive VP of Corporate Affairs | 55 |
| Mr. Matthew Paul Tucker | Head of Investor Relations & Competitive Intelligence | - |
| Ms. Mary Ellen Glynn | Senior Director of Corporate Communications | - |
| Jana C. Humble | Senior VP & Chief Human Resources Officer | - |
| Mr. Michael W. Blackford | Senior VP & Chief Product Officer for Columbia Brand | 56 |
Prüfungsrisiko
3
Vorstandsrisiko
4
Vergütungsrisiko
5
Aktionärsrechterisiko
2
Teil 2 · Der Preis und der Einstiegszeitpunkt
Dieser Teil sagt nicht, ob das Unternehmen etwas taugt: Er hilft bei der Wahl des Kaufzeitpunkts, nachdem die Fundamentaldaten überzeugt haben. Enthalten: technische Analyse, Potenzial, historische Drawdowns, Gamma-Exposure.
Dokumente
- Dokument ansehen
Jahresbericht (10-K)
Ein jährlicher Überblick über das Geschäft, die Finanzergebnisse und die Risiken des Unternehmens.
Eingereicht am 2026-02-25
- Dokument ansehen
Quartalsbericht (10-Q)
Ein Update zur finanziellen Entwicklung der letzten drei Monate.
Eingereicht am 2026-08-06
- Dokument ansehen
Ad-hoc-Meldung (8-K)
Eine Mitteilung über ein wichtiges Ereignis, etwa einen Führungswechsel oder eine bedeutende Ankündigung.
Eingereicht am 2026-07-30
via SEC EDGAR
Ertragshistorie
via SEC EDGAR
Latest News
Recent headlines for COLM, sourced from Markets Gazette.