Amdocs Limited (DOX)
Fair bewertetFundamental
77
Kurs
$59.91
Marktkapitalisierung
$6.04B
Teil 1 · Was das Unternehmen wert ist
Übersicht
Amdocs builds and runs the back-office software that telecom operators use to bill customers, manage their accounts and orchestrate their networks — the systems behind the scenes every time someone signs up for a phone plan, gets a bill, or has their service activated. It works for a small number of very large telecom carriers rather than for consumers, and often keeps running the software on the customer's behalf for years after installing it, rather than just selling a one-time license.
Wie das Geld verdient wird
The larger and more stable part of revenue is managed services: Amdocs keeps operating a carrier's billing and network systems on an ongoing contract, which produces recurring, multi-year revenue. The rest comes from project work — building, upgrading or migrating these systems — which is billed as the work is done and is more irregular. Because switching a telecom operator's billing platform is a multi-year undertaking, contracts tend to run for years once signed.
Wettbewerbsvorteil
Wechselkosten · SchmalA telecom operator's billing and customer-management systems touch every subscriber and every invoice, so replacing them is a multi-year, high-risk project most carriers avoid unless forced to. That inertia favors the incumbent vendor, but it is not exclusive to Amdocs: rival providers run the same kind of systems for other large carriers and can win a contract when one comes up for renewal.
Was die Nachfrage antreibt
DefensivTelecom operators must keep billing and serving subscribers regardless of the economic cycle, which supports the managed-services base of Amdocs' revenue. The project-based work that upgrades or migrates systems is more discretionary and can be delayed when a carrier tightens its own capital spending.
Wichtigste Risiken
- Revenue concentrated in a few telecom carriers — A small number of large customers, led by AT&T and T-Mobile, account for a very large share of revenue. Losing or scaling back business with any of them would be difficult to replace.
- Consolidation among telecom operators — Mergers among telecom carriers reduce the number of potential customers and can put existing contracts up for renegotiation when two customers combine their systems.
- Long, complex projects can run over budget — Large system builds and migrations for telecom operators are technically complex and multi-year; delays or cost overruns on fixed-price engagements can hurt margins.
Kundenkonzentration
Die größten Kunden machen 45.8 % des Umsatzes aus
In fiscal 2025, AT&T alone accounted for 25.9% of revenue and T-Mobile for 19.9%, together nearly half of total revenue, with the ten largest customers accounting for about 70%.
Die Argumente dafür
Buyers argue that the shift toward managed services gives Amdocs increasingly recurring, predictable revenue, that switching costs keep long-standing carrier relationships in place for years, and that telecom operators' need to modernize network and billing systems for cloud and 5G keeps generating new project work.
Die Argumente dagegen
Sellers fear that dependence on two customers for close to half of revenue makes results fragile to a single contract decision, that telecom industry consolidation keeps shrinking the pool of potential customers, and that large fixed-scope technology projects carry real execution risk.
Written by the editors, published on 18. August 2026
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
Generated on 18. September 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users
Oracle Communications sells Billing and Revenue Management, order and catalogue software to the same carriers, competing head-on with the monetization products that are Amdocs' core licence business.
Netcracker sells the same cloud-native BSS/OSS stack — billing, revenue management, customer experience and network automation — to the same telecom operators Amdocs serves, and since taking CSG Systems private in May 2026 it competes with Amdocs across an even wider slice of operator IT spending.
Ericsson's Digital BSS unit bids for the same charging, billing and catalogue contracts with large mobile operators, and can bundle them with the network equipment it already sells them — exactly the 'network equipment providers that offer software systems' Amdocs names as competitors in its 20-F.
Huawei's software business supplies convergent billing and OSS platforms to carriers in Asia, Africa, the Middle East and parts of Europe, and is usually the alternative bid Amdocs faces in those markets.
Nokia's software portfolio — converged charging, monetization, service orchestration and assurance — targets the same 5G monetization and OSS budgets at the same tier-one operators.
Accenture competes for the services half of Amdocs' revenue, bidding on the same telecom systems-integration, transformation and managed-services contracts that Amdocs' 20-F lists first among its competitor types.
Bilanz & Liquidität
Umsatz
$4.65B
Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)
Nettogewinn
$454M
Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)
Freier Cashflow
$690M
Gesamtes Eigenkapital
$3.29B
Gesamtverbindlichkeiten
$1.09B
Current Ratio
0.94
Zinsdeckungsgrad
-
Schulden/EBITDA
1.05
Gewinn je Aktie
Umsatz & Nettogewinn
Freier Cashflow
Ertragsaufschlüsselung
Historische Aufstellung
Margen im Zeitverlauf
Verschuldung im Zeitverlauf
Wie schwer die Schulden wiegen
Wachstumsraster
Wachstum — Umsatz
Innerer-Wert-Schätzung
Innerer Wert
$77.09
Aktueller Kurs
$59.91
Sicherheitsmarge
+22.3%
Innerer-Wert-Spanne
$50.11 - $104.07
Streubreite zwischen den verwendeten Bewertungsmethoden, kein statistisch kalibriertes Konfidenzintervall.
Bewertungsmethoden
Bewertungskennzahlen
P/E-Verhältnis
13.74
ROE
13.3%
P/B-Verhältnis
1.84
P/FCF
8.76
Bruttomarge
38.3%
ROIC
15.1%
Rentabilitäts-Radar
Wertschöpfung (Wettbewerbsvorteil)
ROIC
15.1%
WACC
6.8%
ROIC − WACC
+8.3 pp
Der ROIC übersteigt die Kapitalkosten: Das Unternehmen schafft Wert für die Aktionäre.
Fundamentalanalyse-Kriterien
Bestanden (14)
- ROIC 15.1%
- Gross Margin 38.3%
- P/FCF 8.76
- P/B Ratio 1.84
- Debt/Equity ratio
- Positive Free Cash Flow
- CapEx intensity
- Current Ratio
- Debt/EBITDA
- DCF valuation (Undervalued)
- ROE 13.4%
- Analyst Consensus 64% Buy
- Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.33
- Net Margin Trend 12.5% vs 9.9%
Nicht bestanden (5)
- Price CAGR 0.02%
- Revenue Growth 5Y 1.7%
- Earnings Surprise avg -0.3%
- PEG Ratio 2.07
- Piotroski F-Score 2/9
Nicht verfügbar (8)
- EPS data insufficient
- Dividend Payout NaN%
- Operating Margin NaN%
- Interest Coverage
- Return on Tangible Assets
- Low reliance on intangibles
- Price below Graham Number
- Share Dilution (missing shares data)
Piotroski F-Score
Ernsthafte finanzielle Bedenken
Gewinnqualität
Hohe Qualität: Gewinne durch Cashflow gedeckt
Aktienverwässerung
Aktienrückkäufe. Aktionärsfreundlich
Institutionelle Beteiligungen
Für dieses Unternehmen liegen keine institutionellen Meldungen vor.
Unternehmensführung
Führungsteam
| Name | Position | Alter |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Shimie Hortig | President, CEO & Director | - |
| Mr. Tal Rozenfeld | Chief Financial Officer | - |
| Mr. Anthony Goonetilleke | Group President of Technology & Head of Strategy | - |
| Mr. Matthew E. Smith | Secretary & Head of Investor Relations | 53 |
| Idit Duvdevany Aronsohn | Head of Corporate Responsibility, Inclusion & Wellbeing | - |
| Mr. Avishai Sharlin | GM & Division President | 58 |
| Mustafa Oyumi | Head of B2B Strategy | - |
| Mr. Rajat Raheja | Division President of Amdocs Development Centre India LLP | 56 |
Teil 2 · Der Preis und der Einstiegszeitpunkt
Dieser Teil sagt nicht, ob das Unternehmen etwas taugt: Er hilft bei der Wahl des Kaufzeitpunkts, nachdem die Fundamentaldaten überzeugt haben. Enthalten: technische Analyse, Potenzial, historische Drawdowns, Gamma-Exposure.
Latest News
Recent headlines for DOX, sourced from Markets Gazette.