Zurück zu den Rankings

Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane S.p.A. (IFSUF)

Unterbewertet
Real EstateReal Estate ServicesItaly

Fundamental

61

Kurs

$6.37

Marktkapitalisierung

$5.89B

Teil 1 · Was das Unternehmen wert ist

Übersicht

INWIT owns and operates a network of over 25,000 telecom towers across Italy, present in 84% of Italian municipalities, and rents space on them to mobile operators who install their antennas and equipment. It does not sell mobile service itself; it is the landlord to the companies that do. Its two largest tenants, TIM and Fastweb+Vodafone, are also its former parent companies and remain its anchor customers under long-term hosting contracts.

Wie das Geld verdient wird

Most revenue comes from long-term Master Service Agreements with TIM and Fastweb+Vodafone, which pay fixed hosting fees fully indexed to inflation with no cap and a zero floor, plus fees from smaller telecom operators renting the remaining tower space. A growing slice comes from Smart Infra services — indoor coverage systems, fiber backhaul and small cells — sold to both anchor and third-party clients as data demand pushes operators toward denser networks.

Umsatz nach Segment

Towers — Anchors80.2%

Tower hosting fees paid by TIM and Fastweb+Vodafone under Master Service Agreements.

Towers — OLOs and Others11.4%

Tower hosting fees from other mobile operators, plus installation and technical service fees.

Smart Infra8.4%

Indoor coverage systems (DAS), fiber backhaul, IoT and small-cell services sold to both anchor and other clients.

Wichtigste Risiken

  • Dependence on two anchor customers — The company states that dependence on a narrow number of clients contributing a significant share of total revenue, combined with ongoing telecom-market consolidation, is an emerging risk for the business.
  • Risk to the Master Service Agreements — The company states it cannot exclude the risk of premature unilateral termination of the effects of the MSAs with its anchor tenants due to events outside its control, with resulting litigation risk.
  • Refinancing and interest-rate exposure — About 16% of debt is at floating rates, and the company states that conditions for refinancing existing and upcoming bond maturities will depend on prevailing market rates and business developments at the time.
  • Antitrust remedies commitments — Following EU merger clearance conditions, the company must give TIM and Fastweb equal-terms access to about 4,000 sites by 2028 in municipalities above 35,000 inhabitants to third parties that request it, monitored by an independent Monitoring Trustee.
  • Site capacity and permitting constraints — The company cites possible difficulties or delays in hosting new equipment on existing towers due to infrastructural and electromagnetic-emission limits, and in building new infrastructure due to permitting timelines.

Kundenkonzentration

Die größten Kunden machen 80.2 % des Umsatzes aus

About 80% of 2025 revenue came from just two customers, TIM and Fastweb+Vodafone, who are also INWIT's controlling shareholders under a joint shareholder agreement. The company itself flags dependence on a narrow client base as a risk tied to telecom-market consolidation.

Die Argumente dafür

Buyers argue that inflation-linked, contractually guaranteed hosting fees from two anchor tenants give INWIT unusually predictable long-term cash flow, and that growing demand for denser 5G coverage and indoor systems adds a second, less mature growth line on top of the tower business.

Die Argumente dagegen

Sellers fear that a business this dependent on two customers who are also controlling shareholders is exposed if that relationship sours, as the open dispute over how long the current hosting agreements actually run illustrates, and that high leverage leaves limited room if refinancing costs rise.

Written by the editors, published on 18. August 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

Bilanz & Liquidität

Umsatz

$1.07B

Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)

Nettogewinn

$338M

Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)

Freier Cashflow

$499M

Gesamtes Eigenkapital

$3.04B

Gesamtverbindlichkeiten

$5.55B

Current Ratio

0.37

Zinsdeckungsgrad

-

Schulden/EBITDA

7.27

Gewinn je Aktie

Umsatz & Nettogewinn

Freier Cashflow

Ertragsaufschlüsselung

Historische Aufstellung

Margen im Zeitverlauf

Verschuldung im Zeitverlauf

Wie schwer die Schulden wiegen

Wachstumsraster

Wachstum — Umsatz

Innerer-Wert-Schätzung

Allgemeiner FallUnterbewertet

Innerer Wert

$10.87

Aktueller Kurs

$6.37

Sicherheitsmarge

+41.4%

Innerer-Wert-Spanne

$7.06 - $14.67

Streubreite zwischen den verwendeten Bewertungsmethoden, kein statistisch kalibriertes Konfidenzintervall.

Bewertungsmethoden

Kursziel der Analysten:$7.79
Diskontierter Cashflow (DCF):$22.97
Gewinnmultiplikator (P/E):$7.07
Graham-Wachstumsformel:$13.82
Ertragskraftwert (EPV):$6.12
Gerechtfertigtes P/B:$4.66
Dividendendiskontierung (Gordon):Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
P/FFO, Funds from Operations:Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
Gewinn im Zyklusmittel:Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
Umsatzmultiplikator:$1.15
Analystenkonsens:Halten (7B / 13H / 0S)
Letzte Gewinnüberraschung:-2.60%

Bewertungskennzahlen

P/E-Verhältnis

17.65

ROE

9.9%

P/B-Verhältnis

1.94

P/FCF

11.81

Bruttomarge

92.5%

ROIC

5.1%

Rentabilitäts-Radar

Wertschöpfung (Wettbewerbsvorteil)

ROIC

5.1%

WACC

4.1%

ROIC − WACC

+1.0 pp

Der ROIC liegt etwa auf Höhe der Kapitalkosten: Das Unternehmen deckt gerade eben seine Kapitalkosten.

Fundamentalanalyse-Kriterien

Bestanden (10)

  • ROIC 5.1%
  • Gross Margin 92.5%
  • P/FCF 11.81
  • P/B Ratio 1.94
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • ROE 9.8%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 10.2%
  • PEG Ratio 1.01
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 2.23

Nicht bestanden (9)

  • Price CAGR 4.13%
  • CapEx intensity
  • Current Ratio
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • DCF valuation (Fairly valued)
  • Analyst Consensus 35% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg -0.1%
  • Net Margin Trend 33.6% vs 34.2%
  • Piotroski F-Score 2/9

Nicht verfügbar (8)

  • EPS data insufficient
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Operating Margin NaN%
  • Interest Coverage
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • Share Dilution (missing shares data)

Piotroski F-Score

2/9

Ernsthafte finanzielle Bedenken

score
criteria

Gewinnqualität

2.23

Hohe Qualität: Gewinne durch Cashflow gedeckt

Aktienverwässerung

-

Aktienrückkäufe. Aktionärsfreundlich

Institutionelle Beteiligungen

Für dieses Unternehmen liegen keine institutionellen Meldungen vor.

Unternehmensführung

Führungsteam

NamePositionAlter
Dr. Diego GalliGeneral Manager59
Ms. Emilia TruduHead of Planning & Control Department, CFO and Administration, Finance & Control Director-
Mr. Andrea MondoDirector of Technology & Operations-
Mr. Luigi MinervaDirector of Strategy, M&A & Investor Relations-
Mr. Salvatore Lo GiudiceGeneral Counsel & Secretary59
Michelangelo SuigoExternal Relations, Communication & Sustainability Director-
Ms. Giovanna BellezzaHuman Resources & Organization Director57
Mr. Francesco PiccirilloHead of Real Estate57
Alessandro PirovanoInternal Member of Supervisory Body, Head of the Audit Department & Internal Audit Director53
Lucio GolinelliCommercial Department Director-

Prüfungsrisiko

4

Vorstandsrisiko

2

Vergütungsrisiko

2

Aktionärsrechterisiko

5

Teil 2 · Der Preis und der Einstiegszeitpunkt

Dieser Teil sagt nicht, ob das Unternehmen etwas taugt: Er hilft bei der Wahl des Kaufzeitpunkts, nachdem die Fundamentaldaten überzeugt haben. Enthalten: technische Analyse, Potenzial, historische Drawdowns, Gamma-Exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for IFSUF, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for IFSUF.