Zurück zu den Rankings

Nel ASA (NLLSF)

Fair bewertet
IndustrialsSpecialty Industrial MachineryNorway

Fundamental

35

Kurs

$2.08

Marktkapitalisierung

$3.77B

Teil 1 · Was das Unternehmen wert ist

Übersicht

Nel ASA makes the equipment that splits water into hydrogen and oxygen using electricity, a process called electrolysis, for customers who want to produce hydrogen as an industrial input or fuel without burning fossil fuels. It sells two competing technologies — alkaline electrolysers, built at its Herøya plant in Norway, and proton-exchange-membrane (PEM) electrolysers, built in Connecticut — to industrial gas companies, energy firms and other buyers pursuing hydrogen projects. Nel spun off its hydrogen refueling-station business as a separate listed company, Cavendish Hydrogen, in mid-2024.

Wie das Geld verdient wird

Revenue comes from selling electrolyser equipment on a project-by-project basis, so results depend heavily on how many customers reach a final investment decision and place an order in a given period, not on repeat, predictable purchases. Full-year 2025 revenue fell 31% to NOK 963 million from NOK 1,390 million, driven by a sharp drop in alkaline-electrolyser sales that a smaller gain in PEM sales only partly offset — a sign of how lumpy and order-dependent revenue still is in an industry where large hydrogen projects are still early and often delayed.

Was die Nachfrage antreibt

Zyklisch

Orders depend on customers committing capital to large, multi-year hydrogen production projects, decisions that are highly sensitive to government subsidies, the price of competing fossil-fuel-based hydrogen, and the cost of the renewable electricity the process consumes. When any of these turns unfavorable, customers can and do delay final investment decisions, leaving Nel's order book thin for extended periods.

Die Argumente dafür

Buyers argue that offering both alkaline and PEM technology lets Nel serve whichever projects favor either approach, that spinning off the refueling business focuses the company on its larger electrolyser opportunity, and that a rebound in PEM orders points to renewed customer interest once project financing conditions improve.

Die Argumente dagegen

Sellers fear that a 31% revenue decline in a single year shows how few large hydrogen projects are actually reaching a final investment decision, that project-based orders make revenue inherently unpredictable from one year to the next, and that Nel remains unprofitable while it waits for the hydrogen market to scale.

Written by the editors, published on 18. August 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on 19. September 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

P/E: 46.0Score: 65Market cap: $120.91B

Sells its Silyzer PEM electrolysers into the same gigawatt-scale green hydrogen tenders, backed by the balance sheet of a large energy group.

thyssenkrupp nucera AG & Co. KGaANCH2

German pure-play electrolyser maker bidding for the same large-scale alkaline green hydrogen plants in refining, steel and ammonia that Nel targets.

ITM Power plcITM

UK manufacturer of PEM electrolysers sold to the same European industrial and renewable-energy customers as Nel's PEM line.

Plug Power Inc.PLUG

US supplier of PEM electrolysers and hydrogen fuelling equipment, competing with Nel on both of its product lines in North America.

John Cockerill S.A.Not tracked

Privately held Belgian group and one of the largest suppliers of pressurised alkaline electrolysers, expanding in Europe and the United States where Nel also sells.

HydrogenPro ASANot tracked

Norwegian rival offering high-pressure alkaline electrolysers to the same industrial-scale hydrogen projects, often from the same home market.

Bilanz & Liquidität

Umsatz

$935M

Letzte 12 Monate bis zum zuletzt gemeldeten Quartal — Schätzung aus Kennzahlen je Aktie

Nettogewinn

$-1.65B

Letzte 12 Monate bis zum zuletzt gemeldeten Quartal — Schätzung aus Kennzahlen je Aktie

Freier Cashflow

$-598M

Gesamtes Eigenkapital

$3.60B

Gesamtverbindlichkeiten

$218M

Current Ratio

4.00

Zinsdeckungsgrad

-

Schulden/EBITDA

-

Gewinn je Aktie

Umsatz & Nettogewinn

Freier Cashflow

Ertragsaufschlüsselung

Historische Aufstellung

Margen im Zeitverlauf

Verschuldung im Zeitverlauf

Wie schwer die Schulden wiegen

Wachstumsraster

Wachstum — Umsatz

Innerer-Wert-Schätzung

Allgemeiner FallFair bewertet

Innerer Wert

$2.18

Aktueller Kurs

$2.08

Sicherheitsmarge

+4.4%

Innerer-Wert-Spanne

$2.07 - $2.29

Streubreite zwischen den verwendeten Bewertungsmethoden, kein statistisch kalibriertes Konfidenzintervall.

Bewertungsmethoden

Kursziel der Analysten:$2.18
Diskontierter Cashflow (DCF):Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
Gewinnmultiplikator (P/E):Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
Graham-Wachstumsformel:Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
Ertragskraftwert (EPV):Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
Gerechtfertigtes P/B:Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
Dividendendiskontierung (Gordon):Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
P/FFO, Funds from Operations:Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
Gewinn im Zyklusmittel:Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
Umsatzmultiplikator:$1.45
Analystenkonsens:Verkaufen (1B / 9H / 11S)
Letzte Gewinnüberraschung:-34.95%

Bewertungskennzahlen

P/E-Verhältnis

-

ROE

-30.3%

P/B-Verhältnis

1.07

P/FCF

-

Bruttomarge

57.9%

ROIC

-25.9%

Rentabilitäts-Radar

Wertschöpfung (Wettbewerbsvorteil)

ROIC

-25.9%

WACC

7.6%

ROIC − WACC

-33.4 pp

Der ROIC liegt unter den Kapitalkosten: Das Unternehmen vernichtet für jeden investierten Dollar Wert.

Fundamentalanalyse-Kriterien

Bestanden (5)

  • Gross Margin 57.9%
  • P/B Ratio 1.07
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Current Ratio
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 8.1%

Nicht bestanden (10)

  • Price CAGR 0.50%
  • ROIC -25.9%
  • Operating Margin -147.6%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • DCF valuation (Unknown)
  • ROE -32.0%
  • Analyst Consensus 5% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg -170.1%
  • Net Margin Trend -115.0% vs -16.3%
  • Piotroski F-Score 1/9

Nicht verfügbar (12)

  • EPS data insufficient
  • P/FCF NaN
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • CapEx intensity
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/Net Income)
  • Share Dilution (missing shares data)

Piotroski F-Score

1/9

Ernsthafte finanzielle Bedenken

score
criteria

Gewinnqualität

-

Niedrige Qualität: Rechnungslegung prüfen

Aktienverwässerung

-

Aktienrückkäufe. Aktionärsfreundlich

Institutionelle Beteiligungen

Für dieses Unternehmen liegen keine institutionellen Meldungen vor.

Unternehmensführung

Führungsteam

NamePositionAlter
Mr. Kjell Christian BjornsenChief Financial Officer49
Mr. Marius LøkenChief Technical Officer48
Mr. Stein Ove Erdal J.D.Chief Legal Officer46
Ms. Anne LibergChief People & Culture Officer (CHRO)-
Mr. Todd CartwrightChief Commercial Officer59
Mr. Tushar GhuwalewalaSenior VP of PEM Operations-

Prüfungsrisiko

1

Vorstandsrisiko

1

Vergütungsrisiko

6

Aktionärsrechterisiko

1

Teil 2 · Der Preis und der Einstiegszeitpunkt

Dieser Teil sagt nicht, ob das Unternehmen etwas taugt: Er hilft bei der Wahl des Kaufzeitpunkts, nachdem die Fundamentaldaten überzeugt haben. Enthalten: technische Analyse, Potenzial, historische Drawdowns, Gamma-Exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for NLLSF, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for NLLSF.