Zurück zu den Rankings

BeiGene, Ltd. (ONC)

Überbewertet
HealthcareBiotechnologySwitzerland

Fundamental

71

Kurs

$365.94

Marktkapitalisierung

$40.72B

Teil 1 · Was das Unternehmen wert ist

Übersicht

ONC trades under BeOne Medicines, formerly known as BeiGene, a global biotechnology company that discovers, develops and sells cancer drugs. Its lead product, Brukinsa, treats certain blood cancers by blocking an enzyme (BTK) the cancer cells need to survive. Unlike a diversified pharmaceutical company, BeOne's revenue and value are concentrated in a small number of approved oncology drugs sold through its own commercial teams in the United States, Europe and China.

Wie das Geld verdient wird

Almost all revenue comes from product sales of approved drugs, chiefly Brukinsa, plus smaller in-licensed products such as Amgen's oncology portfolio that BeOne distributes in China. Because it sells directly rather than relying on royalties from a partner, it captures the full margin on each sale but also carries the cost of its own sales forces across multiple continents, and revenue depends on doctors continuing to prescribe its drugs over rival treatments.

Umsatz nach Segment

BRUKINSA73%

The company's lead BTK-inhibitor drug for blood cancers such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, sold globally and the main driver of growth.

TEVIMBRA13.8%

An immunotherapy antibody used against several solid tumor cancers, the company's second-largest product.

Amgen in-licensed products9.1%

Oncology drugs originally developed by Amgen that BeOne markets and sells in China under a licensing agreement.

Wettbewerbsvorteil

Patente und Lizenzen · Schmal

Patents on Brukinsa's chemical structure and manufacturing, plus regulatory approvals in dozens of countries, keep generic competitors out for a fixed period, and clinical data showing advantages over the first BTK inhibitor to market support doctor preference. The protection is time-limited by patent expiry and contestable by newer drugs in the same class, so it does not amount to a durable structural barrier.

Was die Nachfrage antreibt

Defensiv

Cancer treatment is not discretionary spending and demand does not track the economic cycle; growth instead depends on winning regulatory approvals for new indications, expanding into new countries, and doctors switching patients from older drugs. The main swing factor is clinical and regulatory success, not the broader economy.

Wichtigste Risiken

  • Revenue concentration in a single drug — Brukinsa accounts for roughly three-quarters of revenue; a safety issue, a more effective competing drug, or loss of patent protection would have an outsized effect on the whole company.
  • Dependence on regulatory approvals — Selling a drug in a new country or for a new use requires approval from that country's health regulator, a process that can be delayed, restricted or denied regardless of clinical trial results.
  • Pricing and reimbursement pressure — Government and private payers in every market where the company sells negotiate or set drug prices and reimbursement terms, and unfavorable changes can reduce revenue on approved products without any change to the drug itself.
  • Clinical trial and pipeline risk — Future growth depends on drugs still in clinical trials succeeding and reaching approval; most experimental cancer drugs fail somewhere in that process, and a failure removes an assumed source of future revenue.

Die Argumente dafür

Buyers argue that Brukinsa's clinical data advantages over older BTK inhibitors are winning doctor preference and market share even as the drug class matures, that expansion into Europe and other markets outside the US and China still has room to run, and that the company reaching full-year profitability in 2025 for the first time shows the commercial model scaling.

Die Argumente dagegen

Sellers fear that concentrating three-quarters of revenue in one drug leaves little room for error if a safety signal, a stronger competitor or a reimbursement setback emerges, that US growth has already begun decelerating from its earlier triple-digit pace, and that sustaining growth requires the pipeline to deliver new approvals on a schedule biotech development rarely respects.

Written by the editors, published on 18. August 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on 19. September 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

P/E: 24.6Score: 70Market cap: $255.21B

Its BTK inhibitor Calquence (acalabrutinib) fights BeOne's Brukinsa for the same chronic lymphocytic leukemia and mantle cell lymphoma prescriptions, above all in the United States and Europe.

P/E: 73.9Score: 75Market cap: $470.55B

Imbruvica (ibrutinib), the first BTK inhibitor on the market and the drug BeOne ran its head-to-head trials against, plus Venclexta, compete for the same blood-cancer patients.

P/E: 38.8Score: 78Market cap: $1.11T

Its non-covalent BTK inhibitor Jaypirca (pirtobrutinib) targets the same leukemia and lymphoma patients, including those who have already progressed on a covalent BTK inhibitor like Brukinsa.

P/E: 116.2Score: 70Market cap: $366.84B

Keytruda (pembrolizumab) is the dominant PD-1 antibody and competes with BeOne's Tevimbra (tislelizumab) in oesophageal, gastric and lung cancer.

P/E: 13.7Score: 73Market cap: $130.49B

Opdivo (nivolumab) covers largely the same PD-1 indications as Tevimbra, particularly oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal tumours.

Innovent Biologics, Inc. (信達生物製藥)1801.HK

In China, where BeOne generates a large share of its revenue, Innovent's PD-1 antibody Tyvyt and its oncology portfolio compete for the same hospital formularies and reimbursement listings.

Bilanz & Liquidität

Umsatz

$6.13B

Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)

Nettogewinn

$656M

Letzte 12 Monate (bis 30.6.2026)

Freier Cashflow

$942M

Gesamtes Eigenkapital

$4.36B

Gesamtverbindlichkeiten

$3.83B

Current Ratio

3.40

Zinsdeckungsgrad

7.97

Schulden/EBITDA

2.06

Gewinn je Aktie

Umsatz & Nettogewinn

Freier Cashflow

Ertragsaufschlüsselung

Historische Aufstellung

Margen im Zeitverlauf

Verschuldung im Zeitverlauf

Wie schwer die Schulden wiegen

Wachstumsraster

Wachstum — Umsatz

Innerer-Wert-Schätzung

Allgemeiner FallÜberbewertet

Innerer Wert

$237.94

Aktueller Kurs

$365.94

Sicherheitsmarge

-53.8%

Innerer-Wert-Spanne

$154.66 - $321.22

Streubreite zwischen den verwendeten Bewertungsmethoden, kein statistisch kalibriertes Konfidenzintervall.

Bewertungsmethoden

Kursziel der Analysten:$432.80
Diskontierter Cashflow (DCF):$8.61
Gewinnmultiplikator (P/E):$282.92
Graham-Wachstumsformel:$91.01
Ertragskraftwert (EPV):$23.98
Gerechtfertigtes P/B:$23.09
Dividendendiskontierung (Gordon):$3.00
P/FFO, Funds from Operations:$4.64
Gewinn im Zyklusmittel:Nicht genügend Daten zur Berechnung
Umsatzmultiplikator:$109.83
Analystenkonsens:Starker Kauf (11B / 1H / 0S)

Bewertungskennzahlen

P/E-Verhältnis

831.68

ROE

6.6%

P/B-Verhältnis

104.54

P/FCF

406.64

Bruttomarge

88.9%

ROIC

10.3%

Rentabilitäts-Radar

Wertschöpfung (Wettbewerbsvorteil)

ROIC

10.3%

WACC

12.6%

ROIC − WACC

-2.2 pp

Der ROIC liegt unter den Kapitalkosten: Das Unternehmen vernichtet für jeden investierten Dollar Wert.

Fundamentalanalyse-Kriterien

Bestanden (20)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • Price CAGR 28.24%
  • ROIC 10.3%
  • Gross Margin 88.9%
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 15.1%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • Current Ratio
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • ROE 13.3%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 78.3%
  • Analyst Consensus 92% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 16.6%
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 2.26
  • Net Margin Trend 10.7% vs -3.9%
  • Piotroski F-Score 7/9

Nicht bestanden (5)

  • P/FCF 406.64
  • P/B Ratio 104.54
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • Share Dilution 10.1%

Nicht verfügbar (2)

  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)

Piotroski F-Score

7/9

Starke finanzielle Gesundheit

score
criteria

Gewinnqualität

2.26

Hohe Qualität: Gewinne durch Cashflow gedeckt

Aktienverwässerung

10.1%

Neue Aktien werden ausgegeben, Eigentum wird verwässert

Institutionelle Beteiligungen

Unternehmensführung

Führungsteam

NamePositionAlter
Mr. John V. OylerCo-Founder, Executive Chairman & CEO57
Mr. Wang Lai Ph.D.President and Global Head of Research & Development48
Dr. Xiaodong Wang Ph.D.Co-Chairman of Scientific Advisory Board, Non-Executive Director & Co-Founder62
Mr. Aaron RosenbergChief Financial Officer48
Mr. Chan LeeGeneral Counsel, Senior VP & Corporate Secretary57
Mr. Titus B. BallVP & Chief Accounting Officer51
Mr. Marcello DamianiChief Technology Officer55
Ms. Liza HeapesHead of Investor Relations-
Ms. Eleanor Duff Ph.D.Senior VP & Head of Corporate Communications-
Mr. Graham HardimanGlobal Head of Human Resources-

Teil 2 · Der Preis und der Einstiegszeitpunkt

Dieser Teil sagt nicht, ob das Unternehmen etwas taugt: Er hilft bei der Wahl des Kaufzeitpunkts, nachdem die Fundamentaldaten überzeugt haben. Enthalten: technische Analyse, Potenzial, historische Drawdowns, Gamma-Exposure.

Dokumente

  • Jahresbericht (10-K)

    Ein jährlicher Überblick über das Geschäft, die Finanzergebnisse und die Risiken des Unternehmens.

    Eingereicht am 2026-02-26

    Dokument ansehen
  • Quartalsbericht (10-Q)

    Ein Update zur finanziellen Entwicklung der letzten drei Monate.

    Eingereicht am 2026-08-05

    Dokument ansehen
  • Ad-hoc-Meldung (8-K)

    Eine Mitteilung über ein wichtiges Ereignis, etwa einen Führungswechsel oder eine bedeutende Ankündigung.

    Eingereicht am 2026-08-26

    Dokument ansehen

via SEC EDGAR

Ertragshistorie

via SEC EDGAR

Latest News

Recent headlines for ONC, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for ONC.