Retour au classement

AECOM (ACM)

Juste valeur
IndustrialsEngineering & ConstructionUnited States

Fondamental

57

Prix

$59.97

Capitalisation boursière

$7.65B

Partie 1 · Ce que vaut l'entreprise

Vue d'ensemble

AECOM is a global professional infrastructure consulting firm headquartered in the United States. It does not own roads, water systems or buildings — it sells the expertise that plans, designs and manages them: transportation and transit projects, water and wastewater systems, environmental remediation, public buildings, and energy and industrial facilities. Its people are engineers, planners, scientists, architects and program managers, and it also runs construction management for clients who want a single firm to oversee a project from concept to delivery. Roughly half of its revenue comes from government bodies — U.S. federal, U.S. state and local, and non-U.S. governments — and half from private companies. For the fiscal year ended 30 September 2025 revenue was $16,139.6 million and backlog stood at $39.7 billion.

Comment l'entreprise gagne de l'argent

AECOM sells professional hours. Revenue is earned under contracts that are billed as work progresses, and the 10-K splits fiscal 2025 revenue into three contract types: cost-reimbursable contracts, where the client pays documented costs plus a fee, at 38% of revenue; guaranteed maximum price contracts, where AECOM commits to a ceiling, at 37%; and fixed-price contracts, where the price is agreed up front and AECOM keeps or absorbs the difference, at 25%. A large share of the work is multi-year, which is why the company reports backlog — $39.7 billion at 30 September 2025 — as the pipeline of contracted work still to be delivered. Because much of the cost line is pass-through subcontractor and subconsultant spending, AECOM also reports 'net service revenue', the portion it earns with its own staff, as its preferred measure of activity.

Chiffre d'affaires par segment

Americas77.6%

Planning, design, engineering, environmental and construction management services in the United States, Canada and Latin America, sold mainly to transportation departments, water authorities, federal agencies and private developers. Revenue was $12,525.9 million in fiscal 2025, up 0.3% on the prior year.

International22.4%

The same design and consulting services delivered in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, India and Asia-Pacific, with the United Kingdom and the Middle East among the larger markets. Revenue was $3,613.2 million in fiscal 2025, down 0.1% on the prior year.

Avantage concurrentiel

Brevets et licences · Étroit

Large public infrastructure programmes are awarded on qualifications, not on price alone: the buyer wants a firm with the technical credentials, the track record on comparable projects, the local licences and — for federal work — the security clearances. That body of accumulated credentials is hard for a newcomer to assemble and is what keeps AECOM on the shortlists, alongside a $39.7 billion backlog that locks in years of work. The advantage is real but not wide: AECOM's own risk factors open by stating that its industry is competitive and that it may be unable to compete effectively, and no client is tied to it by switching costs in the way a software customer would be.

Ce qui stimule la demande

Cyclique

AECOM itself classifies demand for its services as cyclical and vulnerable to sudden downturns and to cuts in government and private spending. What moves the work is the infrastructure investment cycle: public budgets and appropriations for roads, transit and water, plus private capital spending on facilities and energy. Two things soften the swing. Half of fiscal 2025 revenue came from governments — 7% U.S. federal, 24% U.S. state and local, 19% non-U.S. — whose programmes are set years ahead and tend not to stop the moment the economy turns; and $39.7 billion of backlog carries work already won into future periods. But the same public budgets are the transmission channel when spending is cut, and design fees are typically spent before construction starts, so the design cycle turns before the building cycle does.

Principaux risques

  • A competitive industry — AECOM's first disclosed risk factor is that its industry is competitive and that it may be unable to compete effectively, which could result in reduced revenue, profitability and market share.
  • Dependence on key people — The company states that its ability to compete will be harmed if it does not retain the continued services of senior management and key technical personnel. In a firm whose product is expert hours, the asset walks out of the door every evening.
  • Cyclical demand — AECOM discloses that demand for its services is cyclical and vulnerable to sudden economic downturns and to reductions in government and private industry spending, and that its revenue and profitability could be adversely affected if economic conditions weaken.
  • Multi-year government contracts funded one year at a time — The company depends on long-term government contracts, some of which are funded only on an annual basis. If appropriations are not made in the later years of a multi-year contract, AECOM may not realise all of the anticipated revenue and profit from that project.
  • Contracts can be modified or terminated before completion — Governmental agencies may modify, curtail or terminate AECOM's contracts at any time before completion; if the work is not replaced, the company may suffer a decline in revenue.
  • Government audits of reimbursable costs — Contracts with governmental agencies are subject to audit, which can lead to adjustments of reimbursable contract costs and, if the company were charged with wrongdoing, to temporary or permanent suspension from participating in government programmes.
  • Restrictive covenants on the debt — The agreements governing AECOM's debt contain restrictive covenants that limit its ability to finance future operations, acquisitions or capital needs, or to engage in other business activities that may be in its interest.

Concentration des clients

The 10-K states that no single client accounted for 10% or more of revenue in any of the past five fiscal years, and it does not disclose a combined share for the largest clients — so there is no top-customers number to report. What it does give is the mix by type of payer for fiscal 2025: 7% of revenue from direct contracts with U.S. federal agencies, 24% from U.S. state and local governments, 19% from non-U.S. governments, and 50% from private entities worldwide. The concentration that matters here is not a single name but the dependence on public budgets on both sides of the Atlantic.

Les arguments en faveur

Buyers argue that AECOM sits at the front of the infrastructure spending chain: the design and programme-management fees are committed early, so a multi-year cycle of public investment in transport, water and environmental work shows up in its order book before it shows up in anyone's concrete. They point to the $39.7 billion backlog at 30 September 2025, up $2.3 billion on the prior year, as visibility that a pure contractor does not have, and to the business being asset-light — AECOM sells hours, not plant, so growth does not require heavy capital. They also note the deliberate shift away from self-performed construction risk toward advisory work, and management's stated goal of a 20%+ adjusted margin exit rate on net service revenue by fiscal 2028 and 15%+ adjusted EPS growth per year from fiscal 2026 to 2029, as evidence that the mix is moving toward the more profitable end of the business.

Les arguments contre

Sellers fear that the top line is not actually growing: consolidated revenue rose 0.2% in fiscal 2025, the Americas segment 0.3%, and International fell 0.1%, so the improvement investors are being shown rests on margin and on net service revenue rather than on more work. They worry about the payer mix — half the revenue comes from government bodies, and AECOM's own risk factors say multi-year contracts may be funded only one year at a time, may be modified or terminated before completion, and are subject to audits that can claw back reimbursable costs. They point out that a quarter of revenue sits in fixed-price contracts and another 37% under guaranteed maximum price, where a mis-estimated job is AECOM's problem and not the client's. And they note that the business has no lock-in: the company's first disclosed risk is that the industry is competitive, the firm competes for each award, and its real asset is staff who can leave — which is also why the debt covenants that restrict financing flexibility are cited as a constraint in a downturn.

Generated on 17 septembre 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on 17 septembre 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

P/E: 48.1Score: 57Market cap: $16.19B

The closest US-listed peer, bidding against AECOM for the same transportation, water and federal infrastructure design and program-management contracts worldwide.

P/E: 19.8Score: 64Market cap: $8.44B

Overlaps with AECOM in water engineering and environmental consulting, especially for US federal and state agency contracts.

WSP Global Inc.WSP

Canadian engineering consultancy that competes head-on with AECOM for transport, buildings and environmental mandates in North America, the UK and Australia.

Stantec Inc.STN

Competes for the same public-sector design and consulting work in water, transportation and community infrastructure across North America.

Arcadis N.V.ARCAD

Dutch design and consultancy group that bids for the same mobility, water and environmental programmes in Europe, the Americas and Asia.

AtkinsRéalis Group Inc.ATRL

Competes for large transport and nuclear-adjacent engineering and programme-management contracts in the UK, Canada and the Middle East, where AECOM is also a leading bidder.

Bilan & Liquidités

Chiffre d'affaires

$15.39B

12 derniers mois (au 30/06/2026)

Résultat net

$288M

12 derniers mois (au 30/06/2026)

Flux de trésorerie libre

$685M

Capitaux propres totaux

$2.49B

Passif total

$9.50B

Ratio de liquidité général

1.06

Couverture des intérêts

3.12

Dette/EBITDA

3.12

Bénéfice par action

Chiffre d'affaires & Résultat net

Flux de trésorerie libre

Décomposition du résultat

État historique

Marges dans le temps

La dette dans le temps

Le poids de la dette

Grille de la croissance

Croissance — Chiffre d'affaires

Estimation de la juste valeur

Cas généralJustement valorisé

Juste valeur

$70.77

Prix actuel

$59.97

Marge de sécurité

+15.3%

Fourchette de juste valeur

$46.00 - $95.54

Écart entre les méthodes de valorisation utilisées, pas un intervalle de confiance calibré statistiquement.

Méthodes d'estimation

Objectif de cours des analystes:$86.92
Flux de trésorerie actualisés (DCF):$109.29
Multiple de résultat (P/E):$28.89
Formule de croissance de Graham:$46.24
Valeur de la capacité bénéficiaire (EPV):$40.79
P/B justifié:$29.33
Actualisation des dividendes (Gordon):$19.08
P/FFO, les fonds provenant de l'exploitation:$75.10
Bénéfices de milieu de cycle:$114.49
Multiple sur le chiffre d'affaires:$340.50
Consensus des analystes:Achat fort (14B / 4H / 0S)
Dernière surprise sur les résultats:-133.76%

Indicateurs de valorisation

Ratio P/E

27.04

ROE

22.5%

Ratio P/B

3.46

P/FCF

37.29

Marge brute

5.7%

ROIC

8.3%

Radar de rentabilité

Création de valeur (avantage concurrentiel)

ROIC

8.3%

WACC

7.9%

ROIC − WACC

+0.3 pp

Le ROIC est à peu près aligné sur le coût du capital — l'entreprise couvre à peine son coût du capital.

Critères d'analyse fondamentale

Réussi (15)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 6.65%
  • Price CAGR 5.74%
  • ROIC 8.3%
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • ROE 12.5%
  • Analyst Consensus 78% Buy
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.27
  • Share Dilution -2.1%
  • Piotroski F-Score 8/9

Échoué (11)

  • Gross Margin 5.7%
  • P/FCF 37.29
  • P/B Ratio 3.46
  • Operating Margin 4.1%
  • CapEx intensity
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Fairly valued)
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 4.0%
  • Earnings Surprise avg -30.5%
  • Net Margin Trend 1.9% vs 3.8%

Indisponible (2)

  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)

Score F de Piotroski

8/9

Santé financière solide

score
criteria

Qualité des bénéfices

1.27

Qualité élevée : bénéfices soutenus par la trésorerie

Dilution du capital

-2.1%

Rachat d'actions. Favorable aux actionnaires

Participations institutionnelles

Gouvernance

Équipe dirigeante

NomTitreÂge
Mr. W. Troy RuddChairman & CEO60
Ms. Lara PoloniPresident56
Mr. Gaurav Kapoor C.P.A.Chief Financial & Operations Officer48
Mr. David Y. Gan J.D.Executive VP, Chief Legal Officer & General Counsel52
Mr. Giles PriceChief Technical Officer-
Mr. William GabrielskiSenior Vice President of Finance & Investor Relations-
Mr. Brendan Ranson-WalshVice President of Global Communications & Corporate Responsibility-
Ms. Emily GepnerChief Human Resources Officer-
Mr. Stephen PolechronisSenior VP & Director of Latin American Transportation-
Mr. Keith HampsonSenior Vice President of Global Rail & Transit - Business Lines-

Risque d'audit

6

Risque du conseil

5

Risque de rémunération

1

Risque droits des actionnaires

2

Partie 2 · Le prix et le moment d'entrer

Cette partie ne dit pas si l'entreprise vaut la peine : elle aide à choisir quand l'acheter, une fois que les fondamentaux vous ont convaincu. À l'intérieur : analyse technique, potentiel, baisses historiques, exposition gamma.

Documents

  • Rapport annuel (10-K)

    Un aperçu annuel de l'activité, des résultats financiers et des risques de l'entreprise.

    Déposé le 2025-11-19

    Voir le document
  • Rapport trimestriel (10-Q)

    Une mise à jour de la performance financière des trois derniers mois.

    Déposé le 2026-08-11

    Voir le document
  • Rapport d'événement important (8-K)

    Un avis concernant un événement important, comme un changement de direction ou une annonce majeure.

    Déposé le 2026-09-17

    Voir le document

via SEC EDGAR

Historique des résultats

via SEC EDGAR

Latest News

Recent headlines for ACM, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 2/27/2026POSITIVE
    AECOM Lands Major Role In Seattle's Transit Expansion Push

    AECOM (ACM) has recently announced securing significant contracts from Sound Transit, solidifying its pivotal role in Seattle's ambitious public transit expansion plan. The awarded services encompass critical areas such as engineering design, environmental review, and construction management, all essential components for infrastructure projects of this magnitude. This contractual victory not only underscores AECOM's leadership in the engineering and construction sector but also promises a substantial boost to its future revenue streams. For investors, securing such strategic mandates in a growing market like urban infrastructure development represents a robust signal of financial stability and long-term growth potential, reinforcing confidence in the company's stock performance.

  • 2/25/2026POSITIVE
    ACM Research’s AI Surge Collides With Export Controls and Chip Spending Cycles

    Markets Gazette reports a significant signal of interest for ACM Research, a key supplier of advanced tools for semiconductor manufacturing. Penn Capital has announced the initiation of a position in the stock, indicating confidence in the company's growth potential. In an era dominated by artificial intelligence, the increasing complexity of AI-driven chip designs makes ACM Research's precision equipment ever more crucial and valuable. However, investors must consider that demand for these tools remains intrinsically tied to the dynamics of export controls and the industry's capital spending cycles. Despite these macroeconomic variables, Penn Capital's investment suggests an optimistic outlook on ACM Research's role in the future of the semiconductor industry.

via Markets Gazette