Retour au classement

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc (CCEP)

Juste valeur
Consumer DefensiveBeverages - Non-AlcoholicUnited Kingdom

Fondamental

61

Prix

$101.71

Capitalisation boursière

$44.14B

Partie 1 · Ce que vaut l'entreprise

Vue d'ensemble

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners does not make Coca-Cola's recipe or set its marketing; it is the independent bottler that turns concentrate supplied by The Coca-Cola Company into finished drinks and gets them onto shelves and into fridges across Europe, Australia, the Pacific and Indonesia. It owns the factories, trucks and delivery routes, negotiates with individual retailers, and also bottles some Coca-Cola-owned brands like Costa Coffee alongside sparkling and still drinks under long-term bottling agreements.

Comment l'entreprise gagne de l'argent

Revenue is unit case volume multiplied by price, shaped by which brands, package sizes and sales channels each case comes from: a can sold through a vending machine or a bar earns a different margin than a large bottle sold in a supermarket. CCEP owns the manufacturing, packaging and delivery, letting it capture wholesale and retail margin, but it pays for concentrate and shares brand investment with The Coca-Cola Company, so its own pricing and product decisions stay bounded by the bottling agreement.

Chiffre d'affaires par segment

Europe74.4%

Bottling and distribution across most of Western and parts of Central Europe, CCEP's original and largest geography.

Asia-Pacific and Indonesia25.6%

Bottling and distribution in Australia, the Pacific islands, the Philippines and Indonesia, added through mergers that turned CCEP from a European into a global bottler.

Avantage concurrentiel

Économies d'échelle · Étroit

Owning the region's densest bottling plants and delivery routes for Coca-Cola brands is expensive to replicate, and the long-term bottling agreements give CCEP exclusivity in its territories. The advantage is narrow rather than wide because it depends entirely on The Coca-Cola Company continuing to want CCEP as its bottler and on Coca-Cola brands themselves staying popular; CCEP has no control over the product's formulation or brand strategy.

Ce qui stimule la demande

Défensif

Soft drinks are a low-ticket, habitual purchase that people keep buying through recessions, which makes overall volume fairly steady. The more variable part is mix: consumers can trade down from premium packages or immediate-consumption channels like bars and vending toward cheaper large-format packs at the supermarket, which lowers average price even if volume holds up.

Principaux risques

  • Dependence on The Coca-Cola Company — Nearly all of CCEP's revenue comes from Coca-Cola-branded products, and it is the sole supplier of the concentrates and syrups needed to make them. Any strategic shift or reputational problem at The Coca-Cola Company affects CCEP directly, and CCEP does not control marketing or product formulation.
  • Bottling agreement is not owned outright — CCEP's right to bottle Coca-Cola products rests on long-term agreements rather than owning the brand; the terms of those agreements, including territory and product scope, are negotiated with and can be changed by The Coca-Cola Company.
  • Input cost and currency exposure — As a manufacturer operating across many currencies, CCEP is exposed to swings in packaging, sugar and energy costs and to foreign-exchange movements between its many European, Australian and Indonesian markets.

Les arguments en faveur

Buyers argue that owning the exclusive bottling rights for the world's leading soft-drink brand across a large, diversified set of markets provides steady, recession-resistant cash flow, and that continued mix shift toward premium packaging and immediate-consumption channels can keep growing revenue even where volume growth is modest.

Les arguments contre

Sellers fear that a business this dependent on a single brand owner has little room to diversify away from decisions made in Atlanta, that rising health consciousness and sugar taxes could weigh on sparkling-drink volumes over time, and that input-cost inflation can compress margins in a business with limited pricing power of its own.

Written by the editors, published on 18 août 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on 18 septembre 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

P/E: 16.5Score: 61Market cap: $174.91B

PepsiCo's colas, flavoured carbonates, sports drinks and snack-linked beverage brands fight CCEP for the same supermarket shelf space, restaurant contracts and vending placements across Western Europe, Australia and Indonesia.

P/E: 15.4Score: 66Market cap: $1.40T

Through Orangina, Schweppes, Oasis and Lucozade in Europe and Suntory Oceania's Pepsi, V and Gatorade range in Australia and New Zealand, Suntory sells non-alcoholic drinks in almost exactly the same countries and channels as CCEP.

Asahi Group Holdings, Ltd. (アサヒグループホールディングス)2502

Asahi Beverages holds the Pepsi and Schweppes bottling rights in Australia and runs a soft-drink and water business built on the same model as CCEP Australia, competing store by store for the same shoppers.

Carlsberg Britvic (Carlsberg A/S)Not tracked

Since Carlsberg absorbed Britvic in January 2025 it bottles Pepsi and owns Robinsons, J2O and Tango in Great Britain, competing head-on with CCEP for the same pubs, retailers and out-of-home accounts.

Red Bull GmbHNot tracked

Red Bull is the leading energy drink in CCEP's European and Australian territories, competing directly with the energy portfolio (Monster, Coca-Cola Energy) that CCEP sells through the same chilled cabinets and convenience outlets.

Bilan & Liquidités

Chiffre d'affaires

$18.92B

12 derniers mois jusqu'au dernier trimestre publié — estimation à partir de ratios par action

Résultat net

$1.95B

12 derniers mois jusqu'au dernier trimestre publié — estimation à partir de ratios par action

Flux de trésorerie libre

$1.58B

Capitaux propres totaux

$9.43B

Passif total

$12.19B

Ratio de liquidité général

0.89

Couverture des intérêts

-

Dette/EBITDA

3.45

Bénéfice par action

Chiffre d'affaires & Résultat net

Flux de trésorerie libre

Décomposition du résultat

État historique

Marges dans le temps

La dette dans le temps

Le poids de la dette

Grille de la croissance

Croissance — Chiffre d'affaires

Estimation de la juste valeur

Cas généralJustement valorisé

Juste valeur

$100.73

Prix actuel

$101.71

Marge de sécurité

-1.0%

Fourchette de juste valeur

$84.33 - $117.13

Écart entre les méthodes de valorisation utilisées, pas un intervalle de confiance calibré statistiquement.

Méthodes d'estimation

Objectif de cours des analystes:$109.29
Flux de trésorerie actualisés (DCF):$102.16
Multiple de résultat (P/E):$95.03
Formule de croissance de Graham:$126.03
Valeur de la capacité bénéficiaire (EPV):$53.93
P/B justifié:$90.63
Actualisation des dividendes (Gordon):$52.97
P/FFO, les fonds provenant de l'exploitation:Données insuffisantes pour le calculer
Bénéfices de milieu de cycle:Données insuffisantes pour le calculer
Multiple sur le chiffre d'affaires:$49.98
Consensus des analystes:Acheter (15B / 6H / 2S)
Dernière surprise sur les résultats:-1.01%

Indicateurs de valorisation

Ratio P/E

22.70

ROE

23.5%

Ratio P/B

5.40

P/FCF

27.89

Marge brute

36.3%

ROIC

10.4%

Radar de rentabilité

Création de valeur (avantage concurrentiel)

ROIC

10.4%

WACC

6.3%

ROIC − WACC

+4.2 pp

Le ROIC dépasse le coût du capital — l'entreprise crée de la valeur pour les actionnaires.

Critères d'analyse fondamentale

Réussi (15)

  • Price CAGR 12.25%
  • ROIC 10.5%
  • Gross Margin 36.3%
  • P/FCF 27.89
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 12.7%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • ROE 24.8%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 9.4%
  • Analyst Consensus 65% Buy
  • PEG Ratio 2.00
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.55
  • Net Margin Trend 9.3% vs 6.9%

Échoué (6)

  • P/B Ratio 5.40
  • CapEx intensity
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • Earnings Surprise avg -0.1%
  • Piotroski F-Score 2/9

Indisponible (6)

  • EPS data insufficient
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Interest Coverage
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Share Dilution (missing shares data)

Score F de Piotroski

2/9

Préoccupations financières sérieuses

score
criteria

Qualité des bénéfices

1.55

Qualité élevée : bénéfices soutenus par la trésorerie

Dilution du capital

-

Rachat d'actions. Favorable aux actionnaires

Participations institutionnelles

Aucune déclaration institutionnelle pour cette entreprise.

Gouvernance

Équipe dirigeante

NomTitreÂge
Mr. Damian Paul GammellCEO & Executive Director55
Mr. Ed WalkerChief Financial Officer-
Ms. Francesca FaureChief Information Officer-
Sarah WillettVice President of Investor Relations-
Ms. Svetlana WalkerGeneral Counsel & Company Secretary-

Risque d'audit

1

Risque du conseil

7

Risque de rémunération

4

Risque droits des actionnaires

9

Partie 2 · Le prix et le moment d'entrer

Cette partie ne dit pas si l'entreprise vaut la peine : elle aide à choisir quand l'acheter, une fois que les fondamentaux vous ont convaincu. À l'intérieur : analyse technique, potentiel, baisses historiques, exposition gamma.

Latest News

Recent headlines for CCEP, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for CCEP.