Retour au classement

Ericsson (ERIC)

Sous-évalué
TechnologyCommunication EquipmentSweden

Fondamental

75

Prix

$9.12

Capitalisation boursière

$31.03B

Partie 1 · Ce que vaut l'entreprise

Vue d'ensemble

Ericsson designs and sells the radio and core network equipment, and the software that runs it, that mobile operators use to build and run their networks, from earlier generations through today's 5G. It also licenses a large portfolio of patents essential to mobile-standard technology. Alongside network hardware it sells software and managed services that help operators run their networks, plus a smaller enterprise business selling private wireless and communications software.

Comment l'entreprise gagne de l'argent

Most revenue comes from Networks — radio base stations, antennas and the software that runs them — sold and serviced under large, multi-year contracts with a limited number of mobile network operators worldwide. Cloud Software and Services adds recurring software and managed-services revenue on top of the hardware relationship. A separate stream of patent-licensing royalties on Ericsson's standard-essential mobile patents adds high-margin income not tied to equipment volumes.

Chiffre d'affaires par segment

Networks63.8%

Radio base stations, antennas and related hardware and software that form the physical backbone of mobile networks.

Cloud Software and Services26.5%

Core network software, cloud infrastructure and managed services that help operators run and evolve their networks.

Enterprise8.9%

Private wireless networks and communications software sold to businesses outside the traditional mobile-operator customer base.

Other0.2%

Residual revenue not attributed to the three main reporting segments.

Avantage concurrentiel

Coûts de changement · Étroit

Mobile operators build their networks around one vendor's radio and core equipment for years at a time, because mixing vendors in the same network raises integration and support costs; once Ericsson wins a network, replacing it is disruptive and expensive. But Nokia, Huawei and Samsung offer comparable equipment and operators periodically re-tender contracts, so the advantage is not unassailable.

Ce qui stimule la demande

Cyclique

Ericsson's sales follow the capital-spending cycles of mobile network operators, which invest heavily during a generational upgrade such as the 5G rollout and then pull back once networks are built out. A handful of very large operators account for much of this spending, so a slowdown or a delay in the next technology cycle affects revenue directly, with limited buffer from steady replacement demand.

Principaux risques

  • Customer concentration among large operators — The company derives most of its business from large, multi-year agreements with a limited number of significant customers; losing or renegotiating one materially affects results.
  • Technology-cycle dependence — Revenue is tied to the pace at which operators invest in new network generations; a delay in the next upgrade cycle beyond 5G would slow demand with no offsetting growth driver.
  • Competition from Nokia, Huawei and Samsung — Intense competition in network equipment, including from lower-cost vendors supported by state backing in some markets, pressures pricing and market share.
  • Geopolitical and trade restrictions — Government restrictions on network equipment vendors, such as security reviews or bans in certain countries, can shut Ericsson out of markets or force costly redesigns.

Concentration des clients

Ericsson discloses that a large share of revenue comes from large, multi-year agreements with a limited number of significant customers concentrated by industry and geography, though it does not break out the exact share held by its single largest customer.

Les arguments en faveur

Buyers argue that Ericsson's installed base and patent portfolio give it a durable position with operators through successive network generations, and that a future upgrade cycle beyond 5G would again drive multi-year equipment spending in its favour.

Les arguments contre

Sellers fear that revenue concentrated among a handful of large operators leaves Ericsson exposed to their capital-spending decisions, and that Huawei and Samsung's lower pricing in several markets could keep eroding share and margins.

Données par segment de l'exercice 2025Sources: Ericsson Annual Report 2025Ericsson Annual Report 2025 published

Written by the editors, published on 18 août 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Generated on 18 septembre 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

Nokia Corporation (Nokia Oyj)NOKIA

Nokia is the other Nordic full-line supplier of mobile network equipment, bidding against Ericsson for the same 5G radio access, core and transport contracts with the same operators in Europe, North America and India.

Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. (华为技术有限公司)Not tracked

Huawei is the largest radio access network supplier in the world and Ericsson's main rival for operator contracts in China, the Middle East, Africa and parts of Asia, where it is not excluded on security grounds.

ZTE Corporation (中兴通讯股份有限公司)000063

ZTE is the fourth-largest radio access network vendor and competes with Ericsson on price for mobile network build-outs in China and in emerging markets across Asia, Africa and Latin America.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (삼성전자)005930

Samsung's network business sells 5G radio and virtualized RAN equipment to the same large operators, and has taken share from Ericsson in the United States, Korea, Japan and India.

NEC Corporation (日本電気株式会社)6701

NEC supplies radio units, Open RAN software and network integration services to operators in Japan, Europe and the Gulf, competing for the same mobile infrastructure budgets Ericsson targets.

Bilan & Liquidités

Chiffre d'affaires

$227.55B

12 derniers mois (au 30/06/2026)

Résultat net

$24.65B

12 derniers mois (au 30/06/2026)

Flux de trésorerie libre

$30.71B

Capitaux propres totaux

$92.42B

Passif total

-

Ratio de liquidité général

1.12

Couverture des intérêts

-

Dette/EBITDA

-

Bénéfice par action

Chiffre d'affaires & Résultat net

Flux de trésorerie libre

Décomposition du résultat

État historique

Marges dans le temps

La dette dans le temps

Le poids de la dette

Grille de la croissance

Croissance — Chiffre d'affaires

Estimation de la juste valeur

Cas généralSous-évalué

Juste valeur

$73.93

Prix actuel

$9.12

Marge de sécurité

+87.7%

Fourchette de juste valeur

$48.06 - $99.81

Écart entre les méthodes de valorisation utilisées, pas un intervalle de confiance calibré statistiquement.

Méthodes d'estimation

Objectif de cours des analystes:$9.33
Flux de trésorerie actualisés (DCF):$295.04
Multiple de résultat (P/E):$10.52
Formule de croissance de Graham:$18.68
Valeur de la capacité bénéficiaire (EPV):$100.11
P/B justifié:$160.60
Actualisation des dividendes (Gordon):$74.10
P/FFO, les fonds provenant de l'exploitation:Données insuffisantes pour le calculer
Bénéfices de milieu de cycle:Données insuffisantes pour le calculer
Multiple sur le chiffre d'affaires:$349.62
Consensus des analystes:Conserver (6B / 12H / 10S)
Dernière surprise sur les résultats:+2.68%

Indicateurs de valorisation

Ratio P/E

12.68

ROE

26.1%

Ratio P/B

0.31

P/FCF

0.93

Marge brute

48.1%

ROIC

-

Radar de rentabilité

Création de valeur (avantage concurrentiel)

ROIC

-

WACC

8.0%

ROIC − WACC

-

Critères d'analyse fondamentale

Réussi (11)

  • Price CAGR 5.26%
  • Gross Margin 48.1%
  • P/FCF 0.93
  • P/B Ratio 0.31
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • DCF valuation (Undervalued)
  • ROE 23.5%
  • Earnings Surprise avg 32.6%
  • PEG Ratio 1.31
  • Net Margin Trend 12.0% vs 0.0%

Échoué (3)

  • Revenue Growth 5Y 0.4%
  • Analyst Consensus 21% Buy
  • Piotroski F-Score 0/9

Indisponible (13)

  • EPS data insufficient
  • ROIC NaN%
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin NaN%
  • CapEx intensity
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/Net Income)
  • Share Dilution (missing shares data)

Score F de Piotroski

0/9

Préoccupations financières sérieuses

score
criteria

Qualité des bénéfices

-

Qualité faible : examiner la comptabilité

Dilution du capital

-

Rachat d'actions. Favorable aux actionnaires

Participations institutionnelles

Gouvernance

Équipe dirigeante

NomTitreÂge
Mr. E. Borje Ekholm MBA, MScCEO, President, Head of Segment Enterprise & Director62
Mr. Per NarvingerExecutive VP & Head of Business Area Networks51
Mr. Lars Sandstrom M.Sc.Senior VP, Head of Group Function Finance & CFO53
Mr. Chris HoughtonSenior VP, COO and Head of Group Function & Group Support59
Ms. Eva-Britt AlleniusChief Accounting Officer-
Mr. Erik EkuddenSenior VP, CTO & Head of Group Function Technology57
Daniel MorrisHead of Investor Relations-
Mr. Scott DresserSr. VP, Chief Legal Officer, Secretary and Head of Group Function Legal Affairs & Compliance58
Ms. Rebecca RohrChief Compliance Officer-
Peter OlofssonHead of Corporate Communications-

Partie 2 · Le prix et le moment d'entrer

Cette partie ne dit pas si l'entreprise vaut la peine : elle aide à choisir quand l'acheter, une fois que les fondamentaux vous ont convaincu. À l'intérieur : analyse technique, potentiel, baisses historiques, exposition gamma.

Latest News

Recent headlines for ERIC, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 3/3/2026NEGATIVE
    AI: Missori (Ericsson), Italia al palo su 5G Standalone, serve supporto pubblico

    Ericsson CEO, Missori, voiced concerns over Italy's lag in 5G Standalone adoption, emphasizing the need for increased public support. Speaking at the Mobile Congress in Barcelona, Missori highlighted the critical interconnection between networks, artificial intelligence, and 5G, a crucial area for future growth. Italy's slowdown could hinder infrastructure investments and technological innovation within the country, potentially impacting Ericsson's business prospects in a key market. The call for state intervention suggests significant hurdles that could delay the deployment of vital digitalization technologies.

via Markets Gazette