Voltar à classificação

MarketAxess Holdings, Inc. (MKTX)

Valor Justo
Financial ServicesCapital MarketsUnited States

Fundamental

67

Preço

$163.92

Capitalização de Mercado

$5.77B

Parte 1 · Quanto vale a empresa

Visão Geral

MarketAxess Holdings operates electronic trading platforms for fixed-income securities — corporate bonds (U.S. investment grade and high yield, eurobonds, emerging markets), municipal bonds and U.S. Treasuries. Institutional investors and broker-dealers meet on its platforms instead of negotiating bond by bond over the phone. Its distinctive feature is Open Trading, an all-to-all anonymous marketplace where any participant can trade with any other rather than only investor-to-dealer; the 10-K reports roughly 1,800 firms active in that pool and estimates it delivered $496.4 million of price improvement to clients in 2025. Around the execution business the company sells market data (including the CP+ AI-driven pricing engine), regulatory trade reporting and matching, and trading technology. MarketAxess is an intermediary: it does not take principal risk on the bonds traded, it takes a fee on the trade.

Como gera receita

Most of the money is a commission on trades executed on the platforms. Commissions come in two forms: variable transaction fees, charged per trade and usually scaled to the size and maturity of the bond, and fixed distribution fees, a subscription-style charge dealers pay for access to the platform. In 2025 variable transaction fees were $600.4 million and fixed distribution fees $134.2 million, out of $846.3 million of total revenue. The rest is recurring service revenue: information services (data and pricing subscriptions), post-trade services (regulatory reporting and trade matching) and technology services, together $111.6 million in 2025. So the top line tracks how much bond volume moves across the platforms, cushioned by a smaller subscription base.

Receita por segmento

Commissions86.8%

Fees earned on bond trades executed on the platforms — a variable fee per transaction paid mainly by institutional investors, plus fixed distribution fees paid by broker-dealers for platform access.

Information services6.3%

Subscriptions to market data and analytics, including the CP+ pricing engine and composite bond pricing, sold to asset managers, dealers and other market participants.

Post-trade services5.3%

Regulatory transaction reporting, trade matching and transparency tools sold mainly to European and UK financial institutions that must report their trades.

Technology services1.6%

Trading technology licensed to clients, including execution management and algorithmic trading tools used alongside the company's venues.

Vantagem competitiva

Efeitos de rede · Estreita

The advantage is liquidity begetting liquidity: the more investors and dealers quote on Open Trading, the better the prices, and better prices attract more participants — a pool of roughly 1,800 active firms that a new entrant cannot simply buy. Years of executed trades also feed the CP+ pricing data that the company then sells back to the market, which is an intangible a smaller rival cannot replicate. The reason for calling it narrow rather than wide is that the company's own filing stresses substantial competition and a rapidly evolving industry, and that clients can and do route the same order flow to competing venues; the network is real but it has not prevented rivals from taking share in electronic credit trading.

O que impulsiona a procura

Moderadamente cíclico

Revenue follows the volume of bonds changing hands, and that volume has two opposing drivers over a cycle. Bond issuance and portfolio rebalancing fall when credit markets freeze, which hurts; but volatility and repricing episodes push more investors to trade and to seek the platform's all-to-all liquidity, which helps. Electronic adoption in fixed income is also still growing structurally, a tailwind that runs underneath the cycle. The subscription lines — data, post-trade reporting, technology, together about one euro in eight — are steadier than commissions. The result is a business that is less cyclical than an investment bank but clearly exposed to how active credit markets are, and to how much of that activity lands on its own venues rather than a competitor's.

Principais riscos

  • Demand depends on factors outside the company's control — The filing states that global economic, political and market factors beyond its control — interest rate movements, inflation, geopolitical tension — could reduce demand for its services, and that a decline in fixed-income trading volumes would harm its business and profitability.
  • Substantial competition — The company discloses that it faces substantial competition that could reduce trading on its platforms or its market share and harm its financial performance.
  • A rapidly evolving industry — The filing warns that the industry is evolving quickly and that, if the company cannot adapt effectively to keep pace, it may not compete effectively — with a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results.
  • Dependence on broker-dealer clients — The company relies on broker-dealer clients to provide liquidity on its platforms; the filing notes that these clients may reduce their activity or move it to competing venues, lowering volumes.
  • Regulation, and self-clearing — As a regulated financial intermediary the company is subject to extensive government oversight that can affect volumes and raise costs, including changes in data protection and AI rules; it also flags the operational, liquidity and regulatory demands of self-clearing and the effect of central clearing mandates for U.S. Treasury securities.
  • Technology, cybersecurity and third-party suppliers — The business runs on its own systems and on third-party providers; the filing identifies information-technology and cybersecurity failures, and the failure of a supplier, as risks to operations, and adds that developing and deploying AI technology can expose it to reputational harm and liability.

Concentração de clientes

The filing does not disclose a percentage of revenue from its largest clients. It does warn, as a risk factor, that certain clients may account for a significant portion of trading volume on its platforms, and the business depends on a relatively small group of broker-dealers to supply liquidity alongside a much broader base of institutional investors. Without a stated number, treat the concentration as acknowledged by the company but unquantified.

Os argumentos a favor

Buyers argue that fixed income is still early in its move from the telephone to the screen, and that whoever owns the deepest all-to-all liquidity pool collects a toll on that shift: Open Trading already gathers around 1,800 firms and produced an estimated $496.4 million of price improvement for clients in 2025, which is the argument for why participants keep coming back. They point to a capital-light model — the company takes a fee, not principal risk on the bonds — and to the services lines, which reached a record $111.6 million in 2025 and grew faster than commissions, giving a recurring, less volume-dependent layer on top. The data franchise, they add, is a by-product of the trading itself: every executed trade improves CP+, which is then sold back to the market.

Os argumentos contra

Sellers fear that the network is less exclusive than it looks. The company's own filing stresses substantial competition and a rapidly evolving industry, and rival venues have been winning share in exactly the protocols — portfolio trading, dealer-initiated flow — where growth has been fastest. They note that commissions are 86.8% of revenue and are tied to volumes the company does not control, while total revenue grew only 3.6% in 2025 and net income fell 9.9% year on year: growth that slow makes the outcome depend on holding share, not just on the market expanding. They also point to dependence on a limited set of broker-dealers for liquidity, to the operational and regulatory load the company itself flags around self-clearing and central clearing of Treasuries, and to the risk that better-capitalised competitors or new AI-driven pricing tools erode the pricing power of the data business.

Generated on 19 de setembro de 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on 19 de setembro de 2026 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

P/E: 24.1Score: 77Market cap: $0

Tradeweb runs the closest rival electronic platform for institutional fixed-income trading, competing with MarketAxess for the same asset managers and dealers in US credit as well as in rates and emerging markets.

P/E: 21.5Score: 65Market cap: $85.84B

Through BondPoint, TMC Bonds and Creditex, ICE offers electronic bond and credit-derivative execution alongside fixed-income pricing data, addressing the same dealers and institutional clients.

P/E: 22.2Score: 72Market cap: $17.92B

CME's BrokerTec platform is a direct rival in electronic US Treasury and repo trading, the rates business MarketAxess has been expanding into.

Trumid Financial, LLCNot tracked

Trumid is a privately held US corporate bond trading network whose daily volumes in investment grade and high yield now sit within a whisker of MarketAxess's, fighting for the same buy-side order flow.

Bloomberg L.P.Not tracked

Bloomberg's terminal-based execution venues and fixed-income data services compete with MarketAxess both for bond trading flow and for the market-data and analytics budgets of the same institutions.

TP ICAP Group plcTCAP

TP ICAP competes for institutional bond execution through Liquidnet's fixed-income venue and Neptune's pre-trade data network, targeting the same buy-side credit desks.

Balanço & Liquidez

Receita

$870M

Últimos 12 meses (até 30/06/2026)

Resultado Líquido

$306M

Últimos 12 meses (até 30/06/2026)

Fluxo de Caixa Livre

$374M

Capital Próprio Total

$1.15B

Passivo Total

$777M

Rácio de Liquidez

2.19

Cobertura de Juros

59.88

Dívida/EBITDA

0.43

Resultados Por Ação

Receita & Resultado Líquido

Fluxo de Caixa Livre

Decomposição dos Resultados

Demonstração histórica

Margens ao longo do tempo

A dívida ao longo do tempo

Quanto pesa a dívida

Grelha do crescimento

Crescimento — Receitas

Estimativa de Valor Justo

Caso geralJustamente Valorizada

Valor Justo

$147.48

Preço Atual

$163.92

Margem de Segurança

-11.1%

Intervalo de Valor Justo

$114.58 - $180.38

Dispersão entre os métodos de avaliação utilizados, não um intervalo de confiança calibrado estatisticamente.

Métodos de Estimativa

Preço-alvo dos analistas:$158.00
Fluxo de caixa descontado (DCF):$168.19
Multiplicador de lucros (P/E):$160.88
Fórmula de crescimento de Graham:$63.28
Valor da capacidade de gerar lucro (EPV):$87.22
P/B justificado:$131.36
Desconto de dividendos (Gordon):$64.55
P/FFO, fundos de operações:$147.00
Lucros de meio de ciclo:$128.32
Multiplicador sobre as receitas:$64.60
Consenso dos Analistas:Comprar (7B / 11H / 0S)
Última Surpresa de Resultados:+3.16%

Métricas de Avaliação

Rácio P/E

19.38

ROE

21.5%

Rácio P/B

4.66

P/FCF

29.69

Margem Bruta

-

ROIC

-

Radar de Rentabilidade

Criação de Valor (Vantagem Competitiva)

ROIC

-

WACC

8.8%

ROIC − WACC

-

Critérios de Análise Fundamental

Aprovado (14)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 18.83%
  • P/FCF 29.69
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 40.5%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • ROE 24.7%
  • Earnings Surprise avg 15.3%
  • Share Dilution -1.4%
  • Net Margin Trend 35.2% vs 26.6%

Reprovado (9)

  • Price CAGR 1.09%
  • P/B Ratio 4.66
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 4.2%
  • Analyst Consensus 39% Buy
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 0.65
  • Piotroski F-Score 4/9

Indisponível (5)

  • ROIC NaN%
  • Gross Margin NaN%
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Current Ratio
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)

Piotroski F-Score

4/9

Sinais mistos: algumas áreas requerem atenção

score
criteria

Qualidade dos Resultados

0.65

Moderada: alguma diferença entre lucros e caixa

Diluição de Ações

-1.4%

A recomprar ações. Favorável ao acionista

Participações institucionais

Governação

Equipa Executiva

NomeCargoIdade
Mr. Christopher Robert Concannon J.D.CEO & Director58
Ms. Ilene J. Fiszel BielerChief Financial Officer56
Mr. Dean BerryGroup COO & CEO of Europe, the Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific52
Mr. Kevin M. McPhersonChief Revenue Officer54
Mr. Nitin A. MirwaniChief Accounting Officer45
Mr. William QuanChief Technology Officer42
Mr. Stephen C. DavidsonHead of Investor Relations-
Mr. Scott Pintoff J.D.General Counsel & Corporate Secretary54
Ms. Julie SheffetChief Human Resources Officer-
Mr. James Nevil Blair RuckerGlobal Head of Operations Services69

Risco de Auditoria

1

Risco do Conselho

1

Risco de Remuneração

2

Risco dos Direitos dos Acionistas

1

Parte 2 · O preço e o momento de entrar

Esta parte não serve para saber se a empresa vale: serve para escolher quando comprá-la, depois que os fundamentos te convenceram. Dentro: análise técnica, potencial, quedas históricas, exposição gama.

Documentos

  • Relatório anual (10-K)

    Uma visão anual do negócio, dos resultados financeiros e dos riscos da empresa.

    Arquivado em 2026-02-24

    Ver documento
  • Relatório trimestral (10-Q)

    Uma atualização sobre o desempenho financeiro dos últimos três meses.

    Arquivado em 2026-08-07

    Ver documento
  • Relatório de fato relevante (8-K)

    Um aviso sobre um fato relevante, como uma mudança na liderança ou um grande anúncio.

    Arquivado em 2026-09-29

    Ver documento

via SEC EDGAR

Histórico de Resultados

via SEC EDGAR

Latest News

Recent headlines for MKTX, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 3/4/2026POSITIVE
    Van Den Berg Boosts MarketAxess Stake as Electronic Platforms Compete for Credit Trading Flow

    Van Den Berg Management has increased its stake in MarketAxess Holdings Inc., a key player in electronic trading platforms for corporate bonds. This increased position by a significant institutional investor signals confidence in MarketAxess's business model within a rapidly evolving sector. As more credit trading moves online and competition among trading venues intensifies, MarketAxess's ability to anchor institutional bond market liquidity is crucial. This move could indicate a positive outlook on the platform's future.

via Markets Gazette