返回排名列表

FormFactor, Inc. (FORM)

被高估
TechnologySemiconductor Equipment & MaterialsUnited States

基本面

62

价格

$149.31

市值

$11.64B

第一部分 · 这家公司值多少

概览

FormFactor makes the tools used to test semiconductors electrically before they are packaged and shipped. Its core product is the probe card: a custom-built interface, designed for one specific chip design, that touches down on the tiny pads of every die on a silicon wafer so that automated test equipment can check whether the chip works. Alongside probe cards it sells analytical probes and laboratory instruments — probe stations, thermal systems and cryogenic systems — used by engineers to characterise devices during development, including emerging fields such as quantum computing. Customers are memory makers, foundries, integrated device manufacturers and fabless chip designers. Fiscal 2025 revenues were $785.0 million.

盈利方式

Revenue is essentially transactional: FormFactor sells hardware, largely direct to semiconductor manufacturers and partly through manufacturers' representatives and distributors, and recognises revenue when the product is delivered. There is no subscription. Probe cards are consumable and design-specific: a new chip design, or a new process node, generally requires a new probe card, and cards wear out with use, so demand recurs as customers introduce designs and run volume production. The company states it has limited backlog and depends on orders booked and shipped within the same quarter, which makes revenue closely tied to current customer order rates rather than to a contracted base.

分部营收

Probe Cards81.3%

Custom probe cards and analytical probes sold to foundries, logic and memory manufacturers for wafer-level test. Within this segment the 10-K splits revenue by end market: Foundry & Logic $369.9 million, DRAM $247.4 million and Flash $20.6 million in fiscal 2025, with DRAM growing on demand for High Bandwidth Memory used in AI systems.

Systems18.7%

Laboratory instruments — probe stations, thermal systems and cryogenic systems — sold to engineering and research teams that characterise devices before volume production. Segment revenue was $147.1 million in fiscal 2025.

护城河

转换成本 · 狭窄

Each probe card is engineered for one customer's specific chip design and must pass a long qualification process on that customer's test floor before it can be used in production, which makes changing supplier mid-programme costly and slow. That advantage is real but bounded: the company states in its risk factors that its markets are intensely competitive, that it must keep pace with each new process node and packaging architecture, and that it has limited backlog — so the relationship is re-won design by design rather than locked in by contract.

需求驱动因素

周期性

Demand follows the semiconductor cycle. The 10-K names as drivers the development and manufacture of new chips, the pace at which manufacturers move to smaller nodes, the volume of production, and end-demand for servers, AI systems, PCs, cars and phones. Two forces overlap: a design-driven one, since every new chip design needs its own probe card, and a volume-driven one, since cards wear out in production. When customers pause new designs or cut wafer starts, both taper at once — and the segments do not move together: fiscal 2025 saw DRAM revenue rise on High Bandwidth Memory for AI while Foundry & Logic fell.

主要风险

  • Revenue concentrated in a few customers — FormFactor discloses that a small number of customers account for a large share of revenues — one customer alone was 22.9% of fiscal 2025 revenues — so losing one, or a slowdown in its programmes, would hit results directly. The company also flags consolidation among semiconductor manufacturers as something that concentrates its customer base further.
  • Dependence on probe cards — The company states that it derives the majority of its revenues from probe card products; a decline in that single product family would not be offset by the rest of the portfolio.
  • Cyclicality of the semiconductor industry — FormFactor lists the industry's cyclicality among its risk factors: its customers' capital and test spending rises and falls with the chip cycle, and the company cannot adjust its cost base as quickly as orders move.
  • Little backlog, quarter-by-quarter visibility — The filing states that backlog is insufficient to cover a quarter's revenues, so results depend on orders received and shipped within the same period; forecasting demand and manufacturing yields is explicitly named as a risk.
  • Technology transitions and customer test strategies — The company warns that it must keep pace with new nodes and architectures, and that changes in how customers test their devices — a different design-for-test approach, or less testing per wafer — can reduce the need for its products.
  • Competition — The first risk factor states that FormFactor's markets are competitive and that failure to compete effectively — on price, performance or lead time — could harm its results.

客户集中度

主要客户占营收的22.9%

One customer accounted for 22.9% of total revenues in fiscal 2025. For comparison, the filing states that two customers together accounted for 33.5% of revenues in fiscal 2024 and one customer for 17.1% in fiscal 2023. The concentration reflects a customer base of large memory makers and foundries, and the company lists it among its risk factors.

看多理由

Buyers argue that FormFactor sits at a toll booth on chip complexity: every new design and every new packaging architecture — High Bandwidth Memory stacks, 3D chiplets, co-packaged optics — needs more test, and the probe card is consumed rather than bought once. They point to fiscal 2025 as evidence that the memory side of that thesis is working, with DRAM probe card revenue rising to $247.4 million from $227.4 million a year earlier on demand for HBM used in AI systems, and to the Systems segment as an early foothold in quantum and cryogenic research. They also argue that the custom, qualified nature of a probe card keeps competitors out of an incumbent's programmes.

看空理由

Sellers fear that the growth is narrower than it looks: consolidated revenue rose only from $763.6 million to $785.0 million in fiscal 2025, because Foundry & Logic probe card revenue fell to $369.9 million from $381.2 million while DRAM grew, and group gross profit was roughly flat at $308.9 million as manufacturing costs, including tariffs, rose. They point to the concentration the company itself discloses — one customer at 22.9% of fiscal 2025 revenues — and to the absence of meaningful backlog, which leaves each quarter dependent on orders taken and shipped within it. Behind that sits the cyclicality the filing lists as a risk: a pause in customers' new designs or wafer starts removes both sources of demand at once.

Generated on 2026年9月18日 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Generated on 2026年9月18日 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

Technoprobe S.p.A.TPRO

Technoprobe is the closest rival in advanced MEMS probe cards for logic chips, bidding for the same wafer-test business at the same leading-edge foundries and fabless customers.

Micronics Japan Co., Ltd. (日本マイクロニクス)6871

Micronics Japan competes head-on for probe card orders from DRAM and NAND memory makers, the segment where FormFactor earns a large share of its revenue.

Japan Electronic Materials Corporation (日本電子材料株式会社)6855

Named by FormFactor itself as a probe card competitor, JEM sells the same consumable wafer-test cards to Japanese and Korean chipmakers.

MPI Corporation (旺矽科技股份有限公司)6223

MPI competes on two fronts at once: probe cards for Asian test houses and the engineering probe stations FormFactor sells to labs and fabs.

Feinmetall GmbHNot tracked

This privately held German maker of probe cards and contact probes chases the same European and automotive-chip test customers.

Korea Instrument Co., Ltd.Not tracked

A Korean probe card supplier that competes for wafer-test spending at Samsung and SK hynix, where FormFactor also sells its memory cards.

资产负债表与流动性

营收

$902M

最近12个月(截至2026/6/27)

净利润

$115M

最近12个月(截至2026/6/27)

自由现金流

$12M

股东权益合计

$1.04B

负债合计

$189M

流动比率

4.08

利息覆盖率

43.97

债务/EBITDA

0.16

每股收益

营收与净利润

自由现金流

收入构成

历史财务表

利润率变化

债务变化

债务负担有多重

增长一览表

增长 — 营业收入

公允价值估算

一般情形被高估

公允价值

$67.84

当前价格

$149.31

安全边际

-120.1%

公允价值区间

$44.10 - $91.58

所用估值方法之间的离散区间,并非经过统计校准的置信区间。

估算方法

分析师目标价:$145.44
现金流折现法(DCF):$16.74
市盈率法(P/E):$53.49
格雷厄姆成长公式:$11.29
盈利能力价值(EPV):$10.32
合理市净率(P/B):$13.04
股息折现模型(戈登模型):数据不足,无法计算
P/FFO(运营资金):数据不足,无法计算
周期中段收益:$19.27
市销率法(P/S):$57.85
分析师共识:买入 (10B / 6H / 0S)
最近财报超预期:+31.92%

估值指标

市盈率(P/E)

102.27

ROE

5.3%

市净率(P/B)

10.50

P/FCF

85.69

毛利率

43.1%

ROIC

7.8%

盈利能力雷达图

价值创造(经济护城河)

ROIC

7.8%

WACC

11.1%

ROIC − WACC

-3.4 pp

ROIC 低于资本成本:公司每投入一美元都在毁灭价值。

基本面分析标准

通过(18)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • Price CAGR 27.91%
  • ROIC 7.8%
  • Gross Margin 43.1%
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 12.9%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • ROE 11.0%
  • Analyst Consensus 63% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 28.7%
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.56
  • Share Dilution 0.7%
  • Net Margin Trend 12.8% vs 5.7%
  • Piotroski F-Score 5/9

未通过(7)

  • P/FCF 85.69
  • P/B Ratio 10.50
  • CapEx intensity
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 2.5%

不可用(2)

  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)

Piotroski F-评分

5/9

信号混杂:部分领域需关注

score
criteria

盈利质量

1.56

高质量:盈利有现金流支撑

股权稀释

0.7%

股份数量稳定

机构持股

公司治理

管理团队

姓名职位年龄
Dr. Michael D. Slessor Ph.D.CEO, President & Director-
Mr. Aric McKinnisSenior VP & CFO42
Ms. Missy FigueroaSenior Vice President of Global Operations-
Mr. Steven NottSenior VP & Chief Information Officer-
Mr. Stan FinkelsteinHead of Investor Relations-
Mr. Alan Lop-Gate ChanSenior VP, Chief Legal Officer & Corporate Secretary48
Ms. Aliza ScottSenior VP & Chief Human Resources Officer-
Mr. Aasutosh DaveSenior Vice President & Chief Commercial Officer-
Mr. Sudhakar RamanSenior VP & GM of Probes Business Unit-
Mr. Jens KlattenhoffSenior VP & GM of Systems Business Unit-

审计风险

4

董事会风险

5

薪酬风险

3

股东权利风险

4

第二部分 · 价格与买入时机

这一部分不判断公司是否值得拥有:它帮助你在基本面说服你之后,选择何时买入。包含:技术分析、潜力、历史回撤、Gamma 敞口。

文件

  • 年度报告(10-K)

    对公司业务、财务业绩和风险的年度概述。

    提交日期:2026-02-20

    查看文件
  • 季度报告(10-Q)

    最近三个月财务表现的最新情况。

    提交日期:2026-08-04

    查看文件
  • 临时报告(8-K)

    关于重大事件(如管理层变动或重要公告)的通知。

    提交日期:2026-07-29

    查看文件

via SEC EDGAR

损益历史

via SEC EDGAR

Latest News

Recent headlines for FORM, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 3/27/2026NEUTRAL
    Here's How Much $100 Invested In FormFactor 10 Years Ago Would Be Worth Today

    An investment of $100 in FormFactor Inc. (FORM) ten years ago would have grown to approximately $1,050 today, representing a significant 950% return. This performance metric highlights the substantial long-term growth potential of the semiconductor equipment manufacturer. Investors considering FormFactor should note its historical ability to generate wealth, though past performance is not indicative of future results. The company operates in a cyclical industry, and its stock price can be influenced by broader market trends and semiconductor demand.

  • 2/21/2026NEGATIVE
    FormFactor Director Sells 3,000 Shares Before Retirement Announcement

    Seven board directors at FormFactor sold shares in February 2026, shortly before a retirement announcement. The sale of 3,000 shares by one director raises questions about potential insider sell-off signals. While executive stock sales can have various motivations, a coordinated sale by multiple board members might indicate a lack of confidence in the company's future prospects or preparation for upcoming events. Investors will be closely watching subsequent moves and company communications to better understand the context of these transactions.

via Markets Gazette