返回排名列表

Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP)

被低估
HealthcareDiagnostics & ResearchUnited States

基本面

68

价格

$604.03

市值

$17.42B

第一部分 · 这家公司值多少

概览

Medpace Holdings is a clinical contract research organization (CRO) based in Cincinnati, Ohio. It runs clinical trials on behalf of pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies that do not have their own trial infrastructure. Its distinguishing choice is a full-service, wholly owned model: rather than subcontracting pieces of a study, Medpace handles feasibility work, study start-up, site selection, patient enrollment support, monitoring, regulatory affairs, data sciences, pharmacovigilance and its own central laboratory and imaging services in-house, across Phase I to Phase IV. The customer base is overwhelmingly small and emerging biopharmaceutical companies: in fiscal 2025, 82% of net revenue came from small biopharmaceutical companies and 13% from mid-sized ones. The company operates internationally but manages itself as a single operating and reportable segment.

盈利方式

Medpace is paid to run studies under contracts that are predominantly fixed-fee: the price is agreed up front for a defined scope of work, and revenue is recognised as the work is performed. This means Medpace, not the sponsor, carries the risk that a study costs more to deliver than it was priced at, and margins depend on estimating and controlling study costs accurately. Alongside service fees, contracts pass through reimbursable out-of-pocket costs such as investigator payments and travel. New business is measured as net awards, and work awarded but not yet performed sits in backlog, which converts into revenue over months to several years. Backlog is not contracted certainty: most customer contracts can be terminated without cause on roughly 30 days' notice, with reimbursement limited to work performed and non-cancellable commitments.

护城河

转换成本 · 狭窄

Medpace reports as a single business, and its advantage, such as it is, comes from the awkwardness of changing CRO once a trial is running: the sponsor would have to move regulatory-grade data, retrain sites and investigators, and accept delay in a study whose timeline is the sponsor's main asset. The integrated model reinforces this, because laboratory, imaging and data work sit inside the same contract rather than with separate vendors. The limits are real: clinical research is a fragmented and price-competitive industry, Medpace competes with far larger CROs and with sponsors' own in-house teams, and contracts can be cancelled on short notice, so the advantage attaches to studies already under way rather than to a guaranteed stream of new ones.

需求驱动因素

周期性

Demand comes from the research and development budgets of drug developers and from how much of that work they choose to outsource. Because 82% of Medpace's fiscal 2025 net revenue came from small biopharmaceutical companies, its demand is tied to a customer base that funds itself through equity and venture capital rather than from product cash flow. When biotech funding is plentiful, new studies are started and net awards grow; when capital markets tighten, sponsors delay, downsize or cancel programmes, and because contracts can be terminated on short notice this shows up in cancellations and slower backlog conversion rather than only in fewer new wins. Underlying drug development is a long-cycle activity, which smooths revenue somewhat, but the funding sensitivity makes the order book distinctly cyclical.

主要风险

  • Contracts can be cancelled on short notice, and backlog may not convert — The company discloses that the loss, delay or non-renewal of contracts, or non-payment by customers for services already performed, could hurt results, and that backlog may not convert into revenue at the historical rate or within the expected timeframe. Most contracts are terminable without cause on short notice, so reported backlog is an indication of future work rather than a commitment.
  • Customer and therapeutic-area concentration — Medpace lists concentration among its risk factors: if its business becomes dependent on a limited number of customers or on a small number of therapeutic areas, the loss of one of them, or a setback in that field of research, could have a material adverse effect on the business.
  • Fixed-fee pricing and cost overruns — Because contracts are predominantly fixed-fee, the company warns that underpricing a contract or overrunning its cost estimates would reduce profitability. It also flags that operating margins could fall if pricing pressure increases and it cannot offset this with operating efficiencies or revenue growth ahead of expenses.
  • Dependence on customers' ability to fund their research — The filing identifies risks tied to customers' investment decisions and to the wider industry: reductions in research and development budgets, changes in the trend toward outsourcing clinical development, and consolidation among pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies could all reduce the volume of work available to Medpace.
  • Handling of clinical and personal data — Medpace discloses risks from failures of its information systems and from security breaches affecting the data it holds, as well as from the growing body of personal data protection laws in the jurisdictions where it operates, including its roles as legal representative and data representative for customers.
  • Concentrated control by the founder and related-party dealings — The company flags that its founder and chief executive holds a significant ownership stake and influence over corporate decisions, which may create conflicts of interest with other shareholders, and that it engages in transactions with related parties.
  • Operational execution: sites, investigators and patient enrolment — Delivery depends on recruiting suitable investigators and enrolling patients on schedule, and on third-party vendors used within studies. Difficulties in any of these, or the loss of key personnel, could delay studies and damage results.

客户集中度

主要客户占营收的35.1%

For fiscal 2025 the company states that no single customer represented 10% or more of net revenue, while approximately 35.1% of net revenue came from its top ten customers. Concentration is therefore moderate and spread across several accounts rather than resting on one sponsor, but it is meaningful enough that the company names customer concentration among its own risk factors.

看多理由

Buyers argue that the wholly owned, full-service model gives Medpace tighter control over study timelines and cost than competitors who subcontract, which is what small biotech sponsors — the bulk of its customers — are actually buying, since a delayed trial burns cash they raised for a single programme. They point to the structurally high margins this model has produced, to a customer base too small to build clinical operations in-house and therefore committed to outsourcing, and to the founder-led management that still holds a large stake and has run the company since its origin. They also argue that the concentration in small sponsors is a position few large CROs compete for seriously, and that when biotech funding recovers, net awards and backlog respond quickly.

看空理由

Sellers fear the same customer mix from the other side: with 82% of fiscal 2025 net revenue coming from small biopharmaceutical companies, the order book depends on sponsors whose survival depends on raising capital, and a prolonged funding drought turns into cancellations rather than merely fewer awards. They point out that most contracts can be terminated on about 30 days' notice, so backlog can shrink faster than it was built, and that revenue is recognised on fixed-fee contracts where Medpace, not the sponsor, absorbs cost overruns — leaving margins exposed if pricing pressure rises or estimates prove wrong. They also note the risks the company itself discloses around customer and therapeutic-area concentration, competition in a fragmented industry, and the founder's concentrated control together with related-party transactions.

Generated on 2026年9月19日 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on 2026年9月19日 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

P/E: 248.4Score: 55Market cap: $13.42B

Named by Medpace in its own 10-K, ICON is the closest listed pure-play full-service clinical CRO, bidding for the same outsourced Phase I-IV trial programmes from biotech and pharmaceutical sponsors worldwide.

P/E: 33.4Score: 69Market cap: $45.22B

The largest CRO by revenue and the first competitor Medpace names, IQVIA sells the same full-service clinical development contracts to biopharmaceutical sponsors, from trial design through regulatory submission.

P/E: 36.3Score: 68Market cap: $250.91B

Medpace names PPD, now Thermo Fisher's clinical research division, as a major competitor: it runs the same outsourced trials for biopharmaceutical sponsors and is one of the few rivals with comparable global scale.

Fortrea Holdings Inc.FTRE

Spun off from Labcorp in 2023 and listed by Medpace among its major competitors, Fortrea offers the same outsourced clinical trial management and competes hard for small and mid-sized biotech sponsors.

Parexel International CorporationNot tracked

Privately held by EQT and Goldman Sachs Asset Management, Parexel is a global full-service clinical CRO with a long-standing biotech franchise, so it bids against Medpace for the same trial mandates.

资产负债表与流动性

营收

$2.78B

最近12个月(截至2026/6/30)

净利润

$492M

最近12个月(截至2026/6/30)

自由现金流

$682M

股东权益合计

$459M

负债合计

$1.52B

流动比率

0.73

利息覆盖率

-

债务/EBITDA

0.24

每股收益

营收与净利润

自由现金流

收入构成

历史财务表

利润率变化

债务变化

债务负担有多重

增长一览表

增长 — 营业收入

公允价值估算

一般情形被低估

公允价值

$880.94

当前价格

$604.03

安全边际

+31.4%

公允价值区间

$572.61 - $1189.27

所用估值方法之间的离散区间,并非经过统计校准的置信区间。

估算方法

分析师目标价:$589.92
现金流折现法(DCF):$1401.90
市盈率法(P/E):$569.99
格雷厄姆成长公式:$874.13
盈利能力价值(EPV):$150.85
合理市净率(P/B):$212.94
股息折现模型(戈登模型):数据不足,无法计算
P/FFO(运营资金):数据不足,无法计算
周期中段收益:$341.23
市销率法(P/S):$383.90
分析师共识:持有 (7B / 12H / 1S)
最近财报超预期:+4.93%

估值指标

市盈率(P/E)

36.63

ROE

98.3%

市净率(P/B)

40.16

P/FCF

24.65

毛利率

-

ROIC

74.1%

盈利能力雷达图

价值创造(经济护城河)

ROIC异常值

ROIC

74.1%

WACC

10.6%

ROIC − WACC

+63.5 pp

ROIC 超过资本成本:公司正在为股东创造价值。

基本面分析标准

通过(17)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • Price CAGR 32.84%
  • ROIC 74.1%
  • P/FCF 24.65
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 21.0%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • ROE 110.1%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 22.3%
  • Earnings Surprise avg 7.5%
  • PEG Ratio 1.11
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.53
  • Share Dilution -7.8%
  • Piotroski F-Score 6/9

未通过(7)

  • P/B Ratio 40.16
  • Current Ratio
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • Analyst Consensus 35% Buy
  • Net Margin Trend 17.7% vs 18.7%

不可用(3)

  • Gross Margin NaN%
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Interest Coverage

Piotroski F-评分

6/9

信号混杂:部分领域需关注

score
criteria

盈利质量

1.53

高质量:盈利有现金流支撑

股权稀释

-7.8%

正在回购股份,对股东友好

机构持股

公司治理

管理团队

姓名职位年龄
Dr. August James Troendle M.D.CEO, President & Chairman69
Mr. Kevin M. BradyCFO & Treasurer50
Mr. Stephen P. Ewald J.D.Chief Compliance Officer, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary56
Mr. Brad W. HansmanExecutive Vice President of Operations42
Ms. Lauren MorrisAssociate Director of Investors Relations-
Mr. Todd MeyersVice President of Business Development & Marketing-
Mr. Weimin Gai MSSenior Vice President of Biometrics-
Mr. John T. Wynne MBAChief Business Officer-
Ms. Reinilde Heyrman M.D.Chief Medical Officer of Medical Department64
Ms. Gina Leisring M.P.H.Senior Vice President of Clinical Monitoring-

审计风险

6

董事会风险

8

薪酬风险

4

股东权利风险

5

第二部分 · 价格与买入时机

这一部分不判断公司是否值得拥有:它帮助你在基本面说服你之后,选择何时买入。包含:技术分析、潜力、历史回撤、Gamma 敞口。

文件

  • 年度报告(10-K)

    对公司业务、财务业绩和风险的年度概述。

    提交日期:2026-02-10

    查看文件
  • 季度报告(10-Q)

    最近三个月财务表现的最新情况。

    提交日期:2026-07-23

    查看文件
  • 临时报告(8-K)

    关于重大事件(如管理层变动或重要公告)的通知。

    提交日期:2026-07-22

    查看文件

via SEC EDGAR

损益历史

via SEC EDGAR

Latest News

Recent headlines for MEDP, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for MEDP.