Choice Hotels International, Inc. (CHH)
割安ファンダメンタル
69
株価
$101.42
時価総額
$4.54B
パート1 · 企業の価値
概要
Choice Hotels does not own or run hotels: it licenses brand names such as Comfort Inn, Quality Inn and Radisson to independent owners, who pay to use the brand, reservation system and marketing in exchange for following its operating standards. The company owns a small number of hotels directly, but its business is franchising — collecting fees from thousands of properties it does not operate rather than running rooms itself.
収益の仕組み
Most revenue is franchise and management fees, charged as a percentage of each hotel's room revenue plus flat platform fees, so it rises and falls with how full and how expensive franchisees' rooms are, not with Choice's own costs. A large additional revenue line is money collected from franchisees for marketing and reservation systems and then spent on their behalf — this passes through the income statement without adding profit. A small owned-hotel portfolio and other services round out the total.
セグメント別売上高
Royalty and initial franchise fees, plus fees from managed properties — the core, high-margin business of licensing the brand.
Money collected from franchisees to fund shared marketing and the central reservation system, then spent on those same services — a pass-through, not a profit source.
Room and other revenue from the small number of hotels Choice owns and operates directly, unlike the rest of its franchised system.
Fees from co-branded credit cards, procurement programs and other services sold to the franchise network beyond the core royalty.
Residual revenue lines not captured in the categories above.
競争優位性(moat)
スイッチングコスト · 狭いA hotel owner who signs a franchise agreement commits for years and invests in brand-standard renovations, so switching brands means losing that investment and the reservations that come through Choice's system and loyalty program. The moat is real but narrow: at renewal, owners can and do move to a rival chain if the economics no longer work.
需要を左右する要因
景気循環型Franchise fees are a percentage of room revenue, so they track how much people travel and how much hotels can charge — both of which fall in a weak economy. Growth in the number of franchised hotels also depends on owners being able to get construction financing, which tightens in the same downturns that reduce travel.
主なリスク
- Dependence on franchisee performance — Because fees are based on franchisees' room revenue, Choice's results depend on the ability of thousands of independent owners to compete for guests and to obtain financing to build or renovate — factors the company does not directly control.
- Economic weakness reduces travel — The company states that a weak U.S. or international economy reduces demand for hotel rooms and for new hotel development, which lowers both existing royalty fees and the pipeline of new franchised properties.
- Competition for franchisees — Growing the franchise system means competing against other chains for the same hotel owners, which can force Choice to lower fees or offer loans and guarantees as incentives, eating into the margin on new growth.
強気材料
Buyers argue that a franchise model needs almost no capital of its own, converts room-revenue growth across thousands of hotels into high-margin fees, and that the brand and reservation system create enough switching cost to keep the franchise base growing net of defections.
弱気材料
Sellers fear that a travel downturn hits royalty fees directly, that competition among hotel chains for the same owners compresses fee rates over time, and that the large reimbursable-cost revenue line flatters the top line without adding real profit.
Written by the editors, published on 2026年8月18日
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
Generated on 2026年9月18日 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users
Wyndham is the other large pure-play US hotel franchisor in the economy and midscale segments, and its Days Inn, Baymont, La Quinta, Ramada and Echo Suites brands are named in Choice's own 10-K as the direct rivals of Quality Inn, Clarion and WoodSpring Suites.
Marriott competes for the same hotel developers and franchisees with Fairfield against Choice's Comfort brands, Courtyard and AC Hotels against Cambria, and StudioRes in midscale extended stay.
Hilton's Hampton and Hilton Garden Inn are the reference brands in the upper-midscale and upscale segments where Choice places Comfort and Cambria, and LivSmart and LivAway target the same extended-stay guests as WoodSpring and Everhome Suites.
Hyatt Place is cited by Choice as a principal competitor of Cambria Hotels, the upscale brand Choice is pushing as it moves its portfolio upmarket.
IHG franchises Holiday Inn Express, Holiday Inn, Candlewood Suites and Crowne Plaza, which Choice's annual report lists as the competing brands for Comfort, Clarion, Everhome Suites and Radisson.
A member-owned, privately held US chain whose Best Western and SureStay brands compete for the same independent hotel owners and roadside midscale and economy travellers as Quality Inn and Econo Lodge.
貸借対照表と流動性
売上高
$1.62B
直近12か月(2026/6/30まで)
純利益
$328M
直近12か月(2026/6/30まで)
フリーキャッシュフロー
-
自己資本合計
$181M
負債合計
$2.74B
流動比率
0.93
利払い倍率
4.28
負債/EBITDA
4.15
一株当たり利益(EPS)
売上高と純利益
フリーキャッシュフロー
収益内訳
財務推移表
利益率の推移
負債の推移
負債の重さ
成長率グリッド
成長率 — 売上高
適正価値の推定
適正価値
$180.35
現在株価
$101.42
安全マージン
+43.8%
適正価値レンジ
$117.23 - $243.47
使用した評価手法間のばらつきであり、統計的に較正された信頼区間ではありません。
推定方法
バリュエーション指標
P/E レシオ
14.51
ROE
204.1%
P/B レシオ
32.42
P/FCF
-
粗利益率
-
ROIC
12.8%
収益性レーダー
価値創造(経済的モート)
ROIC
12.8%
WACC
6.7%
ROIC − WACC
+6.1 pp
ROICが資本コストを上回っています。企業は株主のために価値を創出しています。
ファンダメンタル分析基準
合格(15)
- EPS shows upward trend
- EPS CAGR 9.89%
- Price CAGR 6.13%
- ROIC 12.8%
- Operating Margin 25.2%
- Current Ratio
- Interest Coverage
- Debt/EBITDA
- Return on Tangible Assets
- ROE 215.1%
- Revenue Growth 5Y 15.6%
- PEG Ratio 0.32
- Share Dilution -3.1%
- Net Margin Trend 20.3% vs 19.5%
- Piotroski F-Score 6/9
不合格(8)
- P/B Ratio 32.42
- Debt/Equity ratio
- Low reliance on intangibles
- Price below Graham Number
- DCF valuation (Overvalued)
- Analyst Consensus 13% Buy
- Earnings Surprise avg -4.8%
- Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 0.68
データなし(5)
- Gross Margin NaN%
- P/FCF NaN
- Dividend Payout NaN%
- Positive Free Cash Flow
- CapEx intensity
Piotroski F-スコア
まちまちのシグナル:一部の領域に注意が必要
利益の質
中程度:利益とキャッシュの間にギャップがある
株式希薄化
株式を買い戻している。株主に友好的
機関投資家の保有
ガバナンス
経営陣
| 氏名 | 役職 | 年齢 |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Dominic E. Dragisich | President, CEO & Director | 43 |
| Mr. Scott E. Oaksmith | Chief Financial Officer | 53 |
| Mr. Patrick J. Cimerola | Chief Human Resources Officer | 56 |
| Mr. Tony Pallas | Chief Technology Officer | - |
| Mr. Jeffrey W. Lobb | Senior VP, General Counsel & Secretary | - |
| Ms. Noha Abdalla | Chief Marketing Officer | 47 |
| Mr. David A. Pepper | Chief Development Officer | 58 |
| Mr. Raul Ramirez Sanchez | Chief Segment & International Operations Officer | 41 |
| Ms. Megan Brumagim | VP of Upscale Brands & Chief Sustainability Officer | - |
| Ms. Sally Bartas | Chief Talent & Culture Officer | - |
監査リスク
3
取締役会リスク
7
報酬リスク
5
株主権利リスク
5
パート2 · 株価と買い時
この部分は企業に価値があるかを判断するものではありません。ファンダメンタルズに納得したうえで、いつ買うかを選ぶためのものです。内容:テクニカル分析、ポテンシャル、過去のドローダウン、ガンマエクスポージャー。
業績推移
via SEC EDGAR
Latest News
Recent headlines for CHH, sourced from Markets Gazette.
- 3/2/2026NEUTRALChoice Hotels Senior VP Empties Out Stock Options Amid Retirement
Choice Hotels International saw a senior executive exercise all her remaining stock options in early February, ahead of her planned retirement in 2026. While this move is a common practice for executives nearing retirement, it does not provide a clear directional signal for the stock. Investors should interpret the event as part of the executive's personal financial planning and compensation management, rather than an indicator of changes in the company's operational or strategic outlook. There are no elements suggesting an immediate impact on Choice Hotels' valuation or future performance, maintaining a neutral view on the stock.
via Markets Gazette