Comfort Systems USA Inc (FIX)
適正価値ファンダメンタル
76
株価
$1630.46
時価総額
$58.36B
パート1 · 企業の価値
概要
Comfort Systems USA is a United States contractor that installs, maintains, repairs and replaces the mechanical and electrical systems inside commercial, industrial and institutional buildings: heating, ventilation and air conditioning, plumbing, piping, building controls, electrical power and fire protection. It also builds parts of those systems off-site, in its own plants, and ships them to the job — modular skids and prefabricated assemblies that are dropped into place, which matters most on very large projects. The company operates through roughly 190 locations across the country, run as a decentralized federation of local operating companies rather than as a single centralized contractor, and it has grown substantially by acquiring those companies. Revenue was $9.10 billion in fiscal 2025, up from $7.03 billion in 2024, and backlog at 31 December 2025 stood at $11.94 billion against $5.99 billion a year earlier.
収益の仕組み
Money comes in two shapes. The larger part is project work: the company signs installation contracts — either 'design and build', where it engineers the system itself, or 'plan and spec', where it bids on someone else's drawings — and recognises revenue as costs are incurred against the total expected cost of the job. Most of these contracts are fixed-price, which means the price is agreed up front and any cost overrun comes out of Comfort Systems' own margin. The smaller part is service: multi-year maintenance agreements that renew automatically, plus repair and emergency calls billed on time and materials. In fiscal 2025 about 92.7% of revenue came from installation-type work and 7.3% from maintenance, repair and replacement services. Cut a different way, 63.2% of revenue came from work in newly constructed facilities and 36.8% from renovation, expansion, maintenance, repair and replacement in buildings that already exist.
セグメント別売上高
HVAC, plumbing, piping, building automation and controls, off-site modular fabrication and fire protection, installed and serviced for owners and general contractors of commercial, industrial and institutional buildings.
Electrical power distribution, wiring, lighting and related systems for the same kind of buildings; this is the faster-growing of the two segments and carries much of the work tied to large technology and data-centre projects.
競争優位性(moat)
規模の経済 · 狭いWhat Comfort Systems has is size in a business where almost everyone else is small: a national network of about 190 locations, a payroll of skilled tradespeople that a new entrant cannot simply hire, surety bonding capacity that lets it take on jobs competitors cannot bond, and off-site fabrication plants that let it deliver a giant project on a schedule a local contractor could not hold. On the largest and most complex work, that combination genuinely narrows the field of who can bid. It should not be mistaken for a wide moat. The company's own filing describes competition as intense and notes that in many of its markets barriers to entry are low, because the work is local, bid job by job, and priced against whoever else shows up. There are no long-term contracted revenues on the installation side: the backlog is large, but each project ends.
需要を左右する要因
景気循環型Demand follows non-residential construction, which rises and falls with the economy, with credit conditions and with the willingness of owners to commit capital; the company lists economic downturns and cyclicality among its own risk factors. Two things soften the swing. About 36.8% of 2025 revenue came from work on existing buildings — renovation, expansion, maintenance, repair and replacement — which is driven by equipment wearing out and by regulation rather than by new construction decisions, and a long backlog means today's revenue reflects orders taken many months ago. What dominates the current cycle is end-market mix: technology customers, chiefly large data-centre and semiconductor projects, accounted for 45.0% of 2025 revenue and manufacturing for 22.1%, so the company's near-term volume is tied far more to one capital-spending wave than to the broad building cycle.
主なリスク
- Cost overruns on fixed-price contracts — Most contracts fix the price before the work starts, and the company bears the risk that labour, materials or schedule turn out worse than estimated. Revenue is recognised on a cost-to-cost basis, so an error in the estimate of total job cost distorts reported profit until it is discovered.
- Dependence on a small number of very large customers — The company discloses that a single customer accounted for about 12.8% of consolidated 2025 revenue, that its largest customer changes from year to year, and that losing a major customer or a major project could materially hurt results.
- Backlog is not guaranteed revenue — Booked work can be cancelled, scaled back or delayed by customers, and the amounts in backlog can be adjusted. A record backlog therefore does not translate one-for-one into future revenue or profit.
- Attracting and keeping skilled labour — The business runs on trained mechanical and electrical tradespeople and on the local managers who supervise them. The company identifies difficulty in recruiting and retaining qualified people — and the cost of paying for them — as a constraint on its ability to take on and execute work.
- Economic downturns and construction cyclicality — Demand depends on non-residential construction activity, which the company describes as cyclical and sensitive to the general economy, to inflation and to interest rates; a downturn reduces the volume of projects put out to bid and pressures pricing.
- Acquisitions, decentralisation and goodwill — Growth has come partly through buying local contractors, which are then run with considerable autonomy. The filing flags the risk of failing to integrate acquisitions, the risk inherent in a decentralised management structure, and the risk that the goodwill carried from past acquisitions is impaired.
- Reliance on subcontractors and on surety bonding — Part of the work is performed by third-party subcontractors whose failure to perform falls back on Comfort Systems, and many contracts require performance bonds; a reduction in available bonding capacity would limit the work the company can accept.
顧客集中度
主要顧客が売上高の12.8%を占める
The filing states that in 2025 one customer represented approximately 12.8% of consolidated revenue, and that the identity of the largest customer changes from year to year. It does not disclose a combined figure for the top five or ten customers. The wider exposure is by end market rather than by name: technology customers made up 45.0% of 2025 revenue, so a slowdown in large data-centre and semiconductor construction would hit a large share of the book even though it is spread across several account names.
強気材料
Buyers argue that Comfort Systems sits in the physical bottleneck of the data-centre build-out: the power and cooling inside the building have to be engineered and installed by someone, and very few contractors have the skilled headcount, the off-site fabrication capacity and the bonding to take on projects of that size. They point to backlog doubling from $5.99 billion at the end of 2024 to $11.94 billion at the end of 2025 — $11.58 billion of it on a same-store basis, so not merely bought through acquisitions — as evidence that the work is already committed rather than hoped for, and to revenue rising from $7.03 billion to $9.10 billion with net income roughly doubling to $1.02 billion as evidence that the company is converting that demand at better margins than it used to. They add that the company generated $1.19 billion of operating cash flow in 2025, that it keeps buying local contractors at modest multiples, and that the 36.8% of revenue from existing buildings gives it something to fall back on.
弱気材料
Sellers fear that this is a fixed-price construction business enjoying an unusually good moment, and that both words matter. Technology customers were 45.0% of 2025 revenue and one customer alone was 12.8%: if the data-centre spending wave slows, a large block of work does not renew, and the backlog that looks like safety is work that ends rather than revenue that recurs — the company itself warns that backlog can be cancelled, delayed or adjusted. They note that the margins being earned today were earned in a market where customers are desperate for capacity, and that when capacity catches up the bidding gets competitive again, in an industry the filing describes as intensely competitive with low barriers to entry in many local markets. They add that with fixed-price contracts the estimating risk sits entirely with the contractor, that a shortage of skilled tradespeople caps how much work can actually be executed, and that a long record of acquisitions leaves goodwill on the balance sheet that a downturn could force the company to write down.
Generated on 2026年9月18日 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
Generated on 2026年9月18日 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users
EMCOR is the closest national peer, bidding for the same mechanical and electrical construction and building-service contracts in U.S. commercial, industrial and institutional facilities, including the data-center work that now drives both companies.
Through its Commercial & Industrial and Infrastructure Solutions segments, IES bids on the same electrical and mechanical design-build packages for data centers and industrial plants that Comfort Systems' electrical segment pursues.
APi competes for the same recurring building-systems service and fire-protection contracts on commercial and industrial properties, the maintenance and retrofit revenue that makes up over forty percent of Comfort Systems' work.
Limbach installs and services the same HVAC, plumbing and controls systems in non-residential buildings, competing for the same owner-direct maintenance and retrofit work in overlapping Midwest, Mid-Atlantic and Southeast metro markets.
Everus' Electrical & Mechanical segment performs the same commercial and industrial MEP installation work, competing for data-center, manufacturing and institutional projects across the same U.S. regions.
Southland is the largest privately held mechanical contractor in the United States and competes head-on for the same design-build HVAC and plumbing packages on large healthcare, education and mission-critical projects.
貸借対照表と流動性
売上高
$3.96B
直近12か月(2026/6/30まで)
純利益
$1.43B
直近12か月(2026/6/30まで)
フリーキャッシュフロー
$1.03B
自己資本合計
$2.45B
負債合計
$3.99B
流動比率
1.21
利払い倍率
79.13
負債/EBITDA
1.36
一株当たり利益(EPS)
売上高と純利益
フリーキャッシュフロー
収益内訳
財務推移表
利益率の推移
負債の推移
負債の重さ
成長率グリッド
成長率 — 売上高
適正価値の推定
適正価値
$1743.38
現在株価
$1630.46
安全マージン
+6.5%
適正価値レンジ
$1299.42 - $2187.35
使用した評価手法間のばらつきであり、統計的に較正された信頼区間ではありません。
推定方法
バリュエーション指標
P/E レシオ
40.70
ROE
41.8%
P/B レシオ
18.09
P/FCF
26.95
粗利益率
27.5%
ROIC
15.8%
収益性レーダー
価値創造(経済的モート)
ROIC
15.8%
WACC
13.3%
ROIC − WACC
+2.5 pp
ROICが資本コストを上回っています。企業は株主のために価値を創出しています。
ファンダメンタル分析基準
合格(22)
- EPS shows upward trend
- EPS CAGR 24.29%
- Price CAGR 48.11%
- ROIC 15.8%
- P/FCF 26.95
- Debt/Equity ratio
- Operating Margin 18.8%
- Positive Free Cash Flow
- CapEx intensity
- Current Ratio
- Interest Coverage
- Debt/EBITDA
- Return on Tangible Assets
- ROE 53.5%
- Revenue Growth 5Y 26.1%
- Analyst Consensus 88% Buy
- Earnings Surprise avg 35.0%
- PEG Ratio 0.84
- Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.78
- Share Dilution -1.1%
- Net Margin Trend 36.2% vs 9.0%
- Piotroski F-Score 8/9
不合格(5)
- Gross Margin 27.5%
- P/B Ratio 18.09
- Low reliance on intangibles
- Price below Graham Number
- DCF valuation (Overvalued)
データなし(1)
- Dividend Payout NaN%
Piotroski F-スコア
財務健全性が高い
利益の質
高品質:利益はキャッシュに裏付けられている
株式希薄化
株式を買い戻している。株主に友好的
機関投資家の保有
ガバナンス
経営陣
| 氏名 | 役職 | 年齢 |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Brian E. Lane | CEO & Director | 68 |
| Mr. Trent T. McKenna J.D. | President | 52 |
| Mr. William George III | Executive VP & CFO | 60 |
| Mr. Terrence M. Reed | Senior VP & Chief Human Resources Officer | 65 |
| Ms. Laura Finley Howell J.D. | Senior Executive Advisor | 37 |
| Mr. Craig Sasser | Chief Operating Officer | 64 |
| Ms. Julie S. Shaeff C.P.A. | Senior VP & Chief Accounting Officer | 59 |
| Ms. Rachel R. Eslicker | Senior VP, General Counsel & Secretary | 34 |
| Mr. R. Dean Tillison | Regional President | - |
| Brian Evans | Regional President | - |
監査リスク
9
取締役会リスク
3
報酬リスク
5
株主権利リスク
9
パート2 · 株価と買い時
この部分は企業に価値があるかを判断するものではありません。ファンダメンタルズに納得したうえで、いつ買うかを選ぶためのものです。内容:テクニカル分析、ポテンシャル、過去のドローダウン、ガンマエクスポージャー。
業績推移
via SEC EDGAR
Latest News
Recent headlines for FIX, sourced from Markets Gazette.
- 4/24/2026POSITIVEHere's How Much You Would Have Made Owning Comfort Systems USA Stock In The Last 10 Years
Comfort Systems USA (FIX) stock has delivered a remarkable performance over the past decade, generating substantial returns for its shareholders. While specific figures are not provided in this snippet, the title implies a significant positive trend in its stock price. Investors who held FIX shares for the last 10 years would have likely seen considerable capital appreciation, underscoring the company's operational success and market position. This historical performance suggests strong underlying business fundamentals and effective management, making it a noteworthy stock for long-term investment consideration.
- 3/10/2026NEUTRALComfort Systems USA Unusual Options Activity
Unusual options activity has been detected for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX). While the specific nature of this activity (e.g., call or put volume, strike prices, expiration dates) is not detailed, significant deviations from typical trading patterns in options markets can sometimes precede notable price movements in the underlying stock. Investors should monitor further developments and consider this activity as a potential indicator of increased market interest or speculative positioning, without a clear directional bias on its own.
- 2/23/2026NEUTRALHere's How Much You Would Have Made Owning Comfort Systems USA Stock In The Last 5 Years
A retrospective analysis highlights the remarkable performance of Comfort Systems USA stock over the last five years, providing investors with a picture of past returns. The article, which is purely informational, calculates the profit an investment in the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) services provider would have generated. While this historical data is impressive and reflects the company's solid growth, it does not introduce new information or catalysts for the market. Traders view such analyses as confirmation of a trend already priced into current valuations. Therefore, the article does not provide a basis for new operational decisions but rather serves as a case study on the success of a long-term investment in the mechanical and construction services sector.
via Markets Gazette