ランキングに戻る

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR)

割高
TechnologySemiconductorsUnited States

ファンダメンタル

67

株価

$1347.22

時価総額

$65.63B

パート1 · 企業の価値

概要

Monolithic Power Systems designs power-management chips: the small components that convert and regulate electricity inside servers, cars, phones and industrial equipment. Like NVIDIA, it is fabless — it designs the chips and has outside foundries manufacture them — so its edge comes from engineering rather than factories. What began as a supplier of chips for laptop and monitor power circuits now sells increasingly into AI data-center power delivery, the fastest-growing part of its business.

収益の仕組み

Revenue comes from selling chips to equipment makers, either directly or through distributors, recognized when the customer takes delivery — there are no subscriptions. Because MPS designs rather than manufactures, and its chips replace several older components with one, it can charge a premium over commodity power parts while keeping costs mostly to research and foundry capacity. The heaviest growth driver is the amount of power-delivery silicon each AI server rack now requires, far higher than in a conventional server.

セグメント別売上高

Storage and Computing26.3%

Power chips for memory, storage drives, notebooks and graphics cards — the largest end market.

Enterprise Data25.2%

Power-delivery chips sold directly into AI servers and data-center racks — the segment tied most closely to AI infrastructure spending.

Automotive21.2%

Power management for infotainment, lighting and driver-assistance systems sold to carmakers and their suppliers.

Communications11.1%

Power solutions for optical modules, routers and networking equipment used to build communications infrastructure.

Consumer9.1%

Chips used in televisions, home appliances and other consumer electronics.

Industrial7.1%

Power components sold into industrial and instrumentation equipment, the smallest end market.

競争優位性(moat)

スイッチングコスト · 狭い

Once an engineer designs an MPS chip into a car, server or phone, replacing it means re-qualifying a new part through months of testing — a cost few customers take on for a component that is a small fraction of the total bill of materials. That gives MPS pricing power on existing designs, but it must still win the next design cycle against larger rivals like Texas Instruments and Analog Devices from scratch.

需要を左右する要因

景気循環型

Demand mixes a cyclical core — automotive, industrial and consumer electronics production rise and fall with the broader economy — with a newer, even more concentrated driver: how much AI server capacity a handful of hyperscalers decide to build. That second driver has been the main source of recent growth, which makes results more dependent on a few large customers' capital budgets than the older, more diversified business was.

主なリスク

  • Concentration in a few AI infrastructure customers — Growth in the largest and fastest-growing segment depends on continued capital spending by a small number of very large data-center operators, whose plans can change without warning.
  • Design-win competition from larger rivals — Texas Instruments, Analog Devices and other larger analog chipmakers compete for the same design sockets, and losing a design cycle can mean years without that customer's business.
  • Dependence on outside foundries — MPS owns no fabrication plants and relies on contract manufacturers for wafers and packaging, so capacity shortages or supplier disruption limit how much it can ship.
  • Cyclical end markets — Automotive, industrial and consumer electronics production all slow in a weaker economy, and inventory corrections at customers have caused sharp swings in orders before.

顧客集中度

MPS does not disclose individual customer names or percentages, but the Enterprise Data segment — its fastest-growing — is concentrated around a small number of AI computing customers, making that growth more fragile than the automotive or industrial businesses.

強気材料

Buyers argue that each new generation of AI servers needs more power-delivery silicon than the last, that MPS's design-win model locks in revenue once a chip is chosen, and that Storage/Computing and Enterprise Data growth show the company capturing a disproportionate share of that buildout.

弱気材料

Sellers fear that the AI-driven growth rests on a handful of customers who could qualify a competing chip or slow their own capital spending, that automotive and industrial end markets remain cyclical, and that larger rivals with deeper resources will eventually contest the design wins MPS has won.

Written by the editors, published on 2026年8月18日

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on 2026年9月19日 with claude-haiku-4-5 — shared with all users

P/E: 42.6Score: 78Market cap: $247.17B

The largest supplier of analog power-management chips, competing with Monolithic Power for the same DC/DC converter and voltage-regulator sockets in industrial, automotive, computing and consumer boards.

P/E: 47.1Score: 78Market cap: $185.40B

Through its Linear Technology and Maxim power lines it sells high-performance regulators and power modules to the same industrial, automotive and data-centre customers Monolithic Power targets.

P/E: 68.6Score: 65Market cap: $73.11B

Competes head-on in power conversion for automotive and for AI-server power delivery, the fastest-growing part of Monolithic Power's business.

P/E: 50.9Score: 68Market cap: $28.48B

Sells power-conversion and motor-drive silicon into the same automotive and industrial customers, competing for the same design wins as Monolithic Power.

P/E: 115.1Score: 65Market cap: $2.89B

A pure-play in highly integrated power-conversion ICs, overlapping directly with Monolithic Power in AC/DC and DC/DC supplies for appliances, industrial and consumer equipment.

Renesas Electronics Corporation (ルネサスエレクトロニクス株式会社)6723

Its Intersil-derived power-management portfolio bids for the same multiphase controllers and point-of-load regulators in computing, communications and automotive designs.

貸借対照表と流動性

売上高

$3.27B

直近12か月(2026/6/30まで)

純利益

$802M

直近12か月(2026/6/30まで)

フリーキャッシュフロー

$666M

自己資本合計

$3.53B

負債合計

$663M

流動比率

4.98

利払い倍率

-

負債/EBITDA

0.02

一株当たり利益(EPS)

売上高と純利益

フリーキャッシュフロー

収益内訳

財務推移表

利益率の推移

負債の推移

負債の重さ

成長率グリッド

成長率 — 売上高

適正価値の推定

一般的なケース割高

適正価値

$1106.63

現在株価

$1347.22

安全マージン

-21.7%

適正価値レンジ

$719.31 - $1493.95

使用した評価手法間のばらつきであり、統計的に較正された信頼区間ではありません。

推定方法

アナリストの目標株価:$1839.80
ディスカウンテッド・キャッシュフロー(DCF):$464.85
利益倍率(P/E):$688.16
グレアムの成長公式:$844.79
収益力価値(EPV):$107.91
正当化されたP/B:$130.37
配当割引モデル(ゴードン):$61.54
P/FFO(運用から生まれる資金):$219.44
中間サイクル利益:$266.30
売上高倍率:$339.16
アナリスト・コンセンサス:強い買い (19B / 4H / 0S)
直近の決算サプライズ:+8.63%

バリュエーション指標

P/E レシオ

82.25

ROE

17.6%

P/B レシオ

17.00

P/FCF

113.07

粗利益率

55.2%

ROIC

17.7%

収益性レーダー

価値創造(経済的モート)

ROIC

17.7%

WACC

14.0%

ROIC − WACC

+3.8 pp

ROICが資本コストを上回っています。企業は株主のために価値を創出しています。

ファンダメンタル分析基準

合格(19)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 21.91%
  • Price CAGR 32.40%
  • ROIC 17.7%
  • Gross Margin 55.2%
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 28.7%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • ROE 21.9%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 27.0%
  • Analyst Consensus 83% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 2.5%
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.03
  • Share Dilution -1.0%
  • Piotroski F-Score 7/9

不合格(7)

  • P/FCF 113.07
  • P/B Ratio 17.00
  • CapEx intensity
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • PEG Ratio 2.71
  • Net Margin Trend 24.5% vs 65.6%

データなし(2)

  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Interest Coverage

Piotroski F-スコア

7/9

財務健全性が高い

score
criteria

利益の質

1.03

高品質:利益はキャッシュに裏付けられている

株式希薄化

-1.0%

株式を買い戻している。株主に友好的

機関投資家の保有

ガバナンス

経営陣

氏名役職年齢
Mr. Michael R. HsingFounder, Chairman, President & CEO65
Mr. Deming XiaoExecutive Vice President of Global Operations62
Ms. Saria TsengEVP of Strategic Corporate Development, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary54
Mr. Maurice SciammasExecutive Vice President of Worldwide Sales & Marketing65
Mr. Robert W. Dean IIInterim Chief Financial Officer60
Ms. Genevieve CunninghamSenior Manager of Marketing Communications-
Mr. Tony BalowVice President of Finance-
Arthur LeeFinance Manager-

監査リスク

10

取締役会リスク

8

報酬リスク

4

株主権利リスク

9

パート2 · 株価と買い時

この部分は企業に価値があるかを判断するものではありません。ファンダメンタルズに納得したうえで、いつ買うかを選ぶためのものです。内容:テクニカル分析、ポテンシャル、過去のドローダウン、ガンマエクスポージャー。

書類

  • 年次報告書(10-K)

    事業内容、財務実績、リスクをまとめた年次の概要。

    提出日: 2026-02-27

    書類を見る
  • 四半期報告書(10-Q)

    直近3か月間の業績に関する最新情報。

    提出日: 2026-08-05

    書類を見る
  • 臨時報告書(8-K)

    経営陣の交代や重要な発表など、大きな出来事に関するお知らせ。

    提出日: 2026-09-10

    書類を見る

via SEC EDGAR

業績推移

via SEC EDGAR

Latest News

Recent headlines for MPWR, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 6/15/2026POSITIVE
    Here's How Much $1000 Invested In Monolithic Power Systems 5 Years Ago Would Be Worth Today

    An investment of $1000 in Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) five years ago would have grown to approximately $4,790 today, representing a significant return of 379%. This performance outpaces the broader market and highlights the company's strong growth trajectory and investor appeal. MPWR's consistent revenue increases and expanding market share in the power management semiconductor sector have been key drivers. Investors considering the stock should note its historical performance as an indicator of potential future gains, though past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

via Markets Gazette